Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest favoring a draw scenario. Paykan looks unstable at home with 50% draws in domestic matches and only 25% wins, scoring an average of just 0.75 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin is a typical draw-prone team with 75% draws away and impressive 75% clean sheets in away games, confirming their defensive effectiveness (averaging 0.25 goals conceded per match). The recent form of both teams is poor – Paykan with 1.6 points per game in the last 5 matches, and the visitors with a streak of 5 consecutive draws. Low xG values for both teams (1.08 vs 0.81) and the visitors' very low average goals in away matches (0.5) suggest a game of a defensive nature with the highest probability of splitting the points. The minimal advantage for the hosts stems solely from playing at home and a better offense in the last 5 matches (4 goals vs 1).
Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paykan played against Shams Azar Qazvin in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on January 28, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Paykan has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Shams Azar Qazvin has 0 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Paykan scores 0.76 goals per game and allows 0.88. Shams Azar Qazvin scores 0.59 and allows 0.76. Games in this league average 1.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Paykan's games and 35% of Shams Azar Qazvin's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 12%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 26% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paykan has the higher season xG average, 1.14 to 0.94 per game. Paykan takes 5.3 shots per game, while Shams Azar Qazvin takes 4.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Paykan leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.24 goals per game after halftime. Shams Azar Qazvin leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paykan's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Shams Azar Qazvin, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.71 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 26% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a very evenly matched contest favoring a draw scenario. Paykan looks unstable at home with 50% draws in domestic matches and only 25% wins, scoring an average of just 0.75 goals per match. Shams Azar Qazvin is a typical draw-prone team with 75% draws away and impressive 75% clean sheets in away games, confirming their defensive effectiveness (averaging 0.25 goals conceded per match). The recent form of both teams is poor – Paykan with 1.6 points per game in the last 5 matches, and the visitors with a streak of 5 consecutive draws. Low xG values for both teams (1.08 vs 0.81) and the visitors' very low average goals in away matches (0.5) suggest a game of a defensive nature with the highest probability of splitting the points. The minimal advantage for the hosts stems solely from playing at home and a better offense in the last 5 matches (4 goals vs 1).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paykan | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.22 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.54 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Paykan is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
0.76 goals / game - Paykan · 0.59 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin
Shams Azar Qazvin is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.88 goals / game - Paykan · 0.76 goals / game - Shams Azar Qazvin
Paykan scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while Shams Azar Qazvin keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).
Shams Azar Qazvin scores in 41% of games (7 of 17 meczów), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paykan
Over / Under - Shams Azar Qazvin
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paykan is 79% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Paykan · 0.82 pts / game - Shams Azar Qazvin
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paykan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 24%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Shams Azar Qazvin - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paykan
Shams Azar Qazvin
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Paykan | Liga | Shams Azar Qazvin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.65 | 1.71 | ▼ 1.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 37% | ▼ 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 26% | ▼ 12% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 41% | 44% | ▲ 47% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 50% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 59% | ▼ 53% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Paykan's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Shams Azar Qazvin. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 0:1 Shams Azar Qazvin. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
Paykan score 0.76 goals per game on average and Shams Azar Qazvin 0.59. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 26% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Paykan's matches and 35% of Shams Azar Qazvin's.
What form are Paykan and Shams Azar Qazvin in?
Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Shams Azar Qazvin 0-5-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin?
The statistical background for Paykan vs Shams Azar Qazvin — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.