PDRM vs Terengganu: match statistics
PDRM is displaying catastrophic form, sitting 13th in the table with a record of just 1 win this season and a streak of 5 consecutive defeats. The hosts have an abysmal home record (14% wins, 57% losses), conceding an average of 3.14 goals per match and registering a -15 goal difference. Terengganu, despite their mid-table position, shows significantly better away form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference of +5. The visitors average 2.33 goals on the road with only 17% of matches ending without scoring, whereas PDRM fails to keep clean sheets (86% of matches with goals conceded). Terengganu's advantage in offensive stats (6.17 shots on target vs 3.29) and higher xG (1.81 vs 1.14) further confirm their dominance. Given the hosts' dramatic form and the visitors' solid away results, a Terengganu victory is the most probable scenario for this fixture.
PDRM vs Terengganu: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PDRM played against Terengganu in Super League (Malaysia). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
PDRM has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Terengganu has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
PDRM scores 0.85 goals per game and allows 3.08. Terengganu scores 2.00 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 3.39 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 54% of PDRM's games and 54% of Terengganu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 85% and 69%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Terengganu has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.01 per game. PDRM takes 7.3 shots per game, while Terengganu takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
PDRM leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Terengganu leads at halftime in 23% and scores 1.15 after halftime.
When the teams score
PDRM's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Terengganu, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.39 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PDRM is displaying catastrophic form, sitting 13th in the table with a record of just 1 win this season and a streak of 5 consecutive defeats. The hosts have an abysmal home record (14% wins, 57% losses), conceding an average of 3.14 goals per match and registering a -15 goal difference. Terengganu, despite their mid-table position, shows significantly better away form with a 50% win rate and a positive goal difference of +5. The visitors average 2.33 goals on the road with only 17% of matches ending without scoring, whereas PDRM fails to keep clean sheets (86% of matches with goals conceded). Terengganu's advantage in offensive stats (6.17 shots on target vs 3.29) and higher xG (1.81 vs 1.14) further confirm their dominance. Given the hosts' dramatic form and the visitors' solid away results, a Terengganu victory is the most probable scenario for this fixture.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PDRM | Terengganu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Terengganu is 135% better for: goals scored per game.
0.85 goals / game - PDRM · 2 goals / game - Terengganu
Terengganu is 74% better for: goals allowed per game.
3.08 goals / game - PDRM · 1.77 goals / game - Terengganu
PDRM scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Terengganu keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
Terengganu scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PDRM
Over / Under - Terengganu
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Terengganu is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / game - PDRM · 1.08 pts / game - Terengganu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PDRM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 8%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Terengganu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -10 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PDRM
Terengganu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| PDRM | Liga | Terengganu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.92 | 3.39 | ▲ 3.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 54% | 48% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 85% | 63% | ▲ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 28% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | • 77% | 77% | • 77% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from PDRM's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Terengganu. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PDRM vs Terengganu?
The Super League match finished PDRM 0:1 Terengganu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PDRM vs Terengganu?
PDRM score 0.85 goals per game on average and Terengganu 2.00. The Super League average is 3.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 54% of PDRM's matches and 54% of Terengganu's.
What form are PDRM and Terengganu in?
Over the last 5 games PDRM have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Terengganu 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PDRM vs Terengganu?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.