Netherlands - EredivisieMAC³PARK StadionData current as of October 15, 2026

PEC Zwolle vs Cambuur: match statistics

PEC Zwolle crest
PEC Zwolle
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Cambuur crest
Cambuur

PEC Zwolle vs Cambuur: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PEC Zwolle played against Cambuur in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on October 11, 2026. Venue: MAC³PARK Stadion. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

PEC Zwolle has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Cambuur has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

PEC Zwolle scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 2.86. Cambuur scores 1.43 and allows 2.71. Games in this league average 3.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 43% of PEC Zwolle's games and 71% of Cambuur's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 86%, compared with league averages of 70% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cambuur has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.18 per game. PEC Zwolle takes 10.6 shots per game, while Cambuur takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

PEC Zwolle leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Cambuur leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

PEC Zwolle's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Cambuur, it is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Eredivisie games average 3.74 goals. Both teams score in 70% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cambuur are more likely to win, although their away record of two draws and a defeat calls for caution. PEC Zwolle have lost all 3 of their home matches, scoring an average of just 0.33 goals and conceding as many as 4, while the visitors average 1.33 goals away from home. Cambuur’s advantage in chance creation is reflected in their away xG of 1.35, compared with the hosts’ 0.87 at home, as well as 4.33 shots on target per match versus 2.33. Zwolle have failed to score in 67% of their home matches, and their defense has allowed chances worth an average of 2.14 xG in those games. In their last 5 league matches, the hosts have conceded 15 goals and Cambuur 12, so the defensive frailties of both sides increase the risk of a draw despite the visitors’ advantage.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Cambuur have been involved in matches with both teams scoring in 100% of their away games, while PEC Zwolle have done so in 50% of their home matches. The visitors average 1.33 goals away from home, while the hosts concede as many as 3.25 at home; PEC, meanwhile, score 1.5 goals at home, against 2.0 conceded by Cambuur away. xG also points to chances at both ends: the hosts create opportunities worth an average of 1.17 goals, compared with 1.56 xG conceded by the visitors, while Cambuur record 1.35 xG against 1.73 conceded by PEC. In their last five matches, the two teams conceded 15 and 12 goals respectively, although PEC scored only 1.0 goal per match over that period, which slightly reduces confidence in the prediction. Even so, both sides' defensive weaknesses and Cambuur's failure to keep a clean sheet away from home point to each team scoring. This supports BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal); BTTS - No would mean at least one team fails to score, not necessarily a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

All previous meetings between the two teams have produced at least two goals, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. PEC Zwolle concede an average of 3.25 goals at home, while Cambuur score 1.33 goals away and have found the net in every such match. Across their last five matches, the hosts conceded an average of 3.0 goals, while the visitors scored 1.8; 80% of matches for each team produced at least three goals. The 3.65-goal forecast also supports higher lines, but Over 1.5 offers a clearer edge because it requires just two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest first-half signal is PEC Zwolle’s weakness: the hosts were trailing at half-time in 3 of their 4 matches, conceding an average of 2.25 goals before the break, compared with 0.67 for Cambuur. PEC failed to lead at the break in any of their last five matches, while Cambuur led twice, strengthening the case for the visitors to have the advantage after 45 minutes. Cambuur could hold on to their lead, as PEC concede an average of 3.25 goals per match overall, compared with 2.00 for Cambuur. In their last five matches, the visitors scored an average of 1.8 goals, while the hosts conceded 3.0. However, this is not a pick without significant risk: Cambuur drew 2 of their 3 away matches and won none, while PEC average 1.25 goals in second halves. Despite the possibility of the hosts mounting a turnaround, their 3 defeats in 4 home matches point towards Cambuur leading at the break and at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
PEC ZwolleCambuur
15Shots13
PEC ZwolleCambuur
6Shots on target4
PEC ZwolleCambuur
1.56xG1.39
PEC ZwolleCambuur
5Corners5
PEC ZwolleCambuur
27Dangerous attacks38
PEC ZwolleCambuur
16Fouls15
PEC ZwolleCambuur
3Cards3
PEC ZwolleCambuur

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PEC ZwolleCambuur
0.86Goals scored / game1.43
PEC ZwolleCambuur
2.86Goals allowed / game2.71
PEC ZwolleCambuur
40%Average possession46%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
3.43Shots on target / game4.14
PEC ZwolleCambuur

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.57Shots per game11.71
PEC ZwolleCambuur
3.43Shots on target4.14
PEC ZwolleCambuur
8.1%Shot conversion12.2%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
40%Possession46%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
1.18xG for1.25
PEC ZwolleCambuur
2.23xG against1.65
PEC ZwolleCambuur

Shooting quality

PEC Zwolle: BalancedCambuur: Counter-attacking
PEC ZwolleCambuur
Accuracy (shots on target)32%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cambuur is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - PEC Zwolle · 1 pts / game - Cambuur

PEC Zwolle
WLDLL
Season result split
14% W14% D71% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-5
0.57 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 at home
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Cambuur
LLDWD
Season result split
14% W29% D57% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-4
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 away
0-2-1
LDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cambuur is 66% better for: goals scored per game.

0.86 goals / game - PEC Zwolle · 1.43 goals / game - Cambuur

Cambuur is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.86 goals / game - PEC Zwolle · 2.71 goals / game - Cambuur

PEC Zwolle scoring profile: strong

PEC Zwolle scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 games), while Cambuur keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).

Cambuur scoring profile: very strong

Cambuur scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while PEC Zwolle keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).

6Goals scored (season)10
PEC ZwolleCambuur
20Goals conceded (season)19
PEC ZwolleCambuur
3.71Average goals per game4.14
PEC ZwolleCambuur
5Goals scored (last 5)9
PEC ZwolleCambuur
15Goals conceded (last 5)12
PEC ZwolleCambuur

How often they score at least...

57%1 goal86%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
29%2 goals43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
0%3 goals14%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
0%4 goals0%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal86%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
86%2 goals71%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
57%3 goals57%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
14%4 goals43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time14%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
14%BTTS in both halves0%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
14%Scored in both halves14%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
29%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
40%BTTS - last 580%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
71%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cambuur is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.57 pts / game - PEC Zwolle · 1 pts / game - Cambuur

PEC Zwolle - half-time state
0% leading57% draw43% trailing
Cambuur - half-time state
29% leading14% draw57% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.57Points per game (1st half)1
PEC ZwolleCambuur
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.43
PEC ZwolleCambuur
1.29Goals conceded (1st half)1.57
PEC ZwolleCambuur
1.71Average goals (1st half)2
PEC ZwolleCambuur
29%Clean sheet before half-time43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
57%No goal before half-time57%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

After half-time (2nd half)

0.57Points per game (2nd half)1
PEC ZwolleCambuur
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)1
PEC ZwolleCambuur
1.57Goals conceded (2nd half)1.14
PEC ZwolleCambuur
2Average goals (2nd half)2.14
PEC ZwolleCambuur
14%Clean sheet after half-time14%
PEC ZwolleCambuur
71%No goal after half-time43%
PEC ZwolleCambuur

PEC Zwolle - second-half results

14% W14% D71% L
4
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.57
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cambuur - second-half results

29% W14% D57% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PEC Zwolle - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.61.4
Average goals per game2.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-6-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Cambuur - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PEC Zwolle
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
5
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Cambuur
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
1
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.93
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PEC Zwolle

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
143%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Cambuur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).

Teams vs league

PEC ZwolleLigaCambuur
Average goals per game• 3.713.74▲ 4.14
Both teams scored▼ 43%70%• 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 71%72%▲ 86%
Clean sheets▼ 14%16%▼ 14%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%81%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%90%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.74
Average goals per game
70%
Both teams scored
72%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
1.74
Home goals / game
2.00
Away goals / game
+-13%
Home attack advantage
+-15%
Home defensive advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
67%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
20%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. CambuurYellow cardDevid Eugene Bouah
  2. PEC ZwolleYellow cardSherel Floranus
  3. PEC ZwolleYellow cardIbrahim Cissoko
  4. CambuurYellow cardJason Ceka
  5. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Sami BouhoudaneOff: Mathieu Maertens
  6. CambuurYellow cardMorgan Costarelli
  7. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Jamal AmofaOff: Devid Eugene Bouah
  8. CambuurSubstitutionOn: Rik MuldersOff: Jamal Amofa
  9. CambuurGoalNicolas Binder
  10. PEC ZwolleYellow cardGabriël Reiziger
  11. PEC ZwolleSubstitutionOn: Damian van der HaarOff: Sherel Floranus

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of PEC Zwolle vs Cambuur?

The Eredivisie match finished PEC Zwolle 0:1 Cambuur. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PEC Zwolle vs Cambuur?

PEC Zwolle score 0.86 goals per game on average and Cambuur 1.43. The Eredivisie average is 3.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 43% of PEC Zwolle's matches and 71% of Cambuur's.

What form are PEC Zwolle and Cambuur in?

Over the last 5 games PEC Zwolle have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cambuur 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PEC Zwolle vs Cambuur?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.