Persekat vs PSMS: match statistics
PSMS displays significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game with four wins, while Persekat averages only 1.0 point per game with one victory. The hosts have a very poor scoring efficiency at home (0.78 goals per game) and as many as 44% of their matches without a goal, which constitutes a serious offensive problem. PSMS is more effective in attack with a 12% shot conversion rate compared to just 6% for Persekat, and they also average 1.33 goals per away game. Although the visitors have no clean sheets away and occupy a higher league position (5th place vs. the hosts' 9th), their advantage in form and efficiency gives them a real chance for victory. A draw is also likely due to Persekat's solid defense at home (0.78 goals conceded per game) and their tendency for draws (78% draws in home matches).
Persekat vs PSMS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persekat played against PSMS in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Persekat has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. PSMS has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Persekat scores 0.63 goals per game and allows 1.21. PSMS scores 1.37 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Persekat's games and 63% of PSMS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 32% and 42%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persekat has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 1.26 per game. Persekat takes 9.5 shots per game, while PSMS takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Persekat leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. PSMS leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.74 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persekat's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For PSMS, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSMS displays significantly better form in their last five matches, averaging 2.4 points per game with four wins, while Persekat averages only 1.0 point per game with one victory. The hosts have a very poor scoring efficiency at home (0.78 goals per game) and as many as 44% of their matches without a goal, which constitutes a serious offensive problem. PSMS is more effective in attack with a 12% shot conversion rate compared to just 6% for Persekat, and they also average 1.33 goals per away game. Although the visitors have no clean sheets away and occupy a higher league position (5th place vs. the hosts' 9th), their advantage in form and efficiency gives them a real chance for victory. A draw is also likely due to Persekat's solid defense at home (0.78 goals conceded per game) and their tendency for draws (78% draws in home matches).
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persekat | PSMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 49% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.16 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PSMS is 140% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Persekat · 2.4 pts / game - PSMS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSMS is 117% better for: goals scored per game.
0.63 goals / game - Persekat · 1.37 goals / game - PSMS
PSMS is 9% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.21 goals / game - Persekat · 1.11 goals / game - PSMS
Persekat scores in 53% of games (10 of 19 meczów), while PSMS keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).
PSMS scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while Persekat keeps a clean sheet in 42% (8 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persekat
Over / Under - PSMS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSMS is 66% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.95 pts / game - Persekat · 1.58 pts / game - PSMS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persekat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PSMS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persekat
PSMS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| Persekat | Liga | PSMS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.84 | 2.68 | ▼ 2.47 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 49% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 48% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 42% | 29% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 69% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 77% | ▲ 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Persekat's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against PSMS. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persekat vs PSMS?
The Liga 2 match finished Persekat 2:0 PSMS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Persekat and PSMS?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Persekat won 1, PSMS won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Persekat vs PSMS?
Persekat score 0.63 goals per game on average and PSMS 1.37. The Liga 2 average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Persekat's matches and 63% of PSMS's.
What form are Persekat and PSMS in?
Over the last 5 games Persekat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and PSMS 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persekat vs PSMS?
The statistical background for Persekat vs PSMS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.