Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak: match statistics
Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persepolis played against Aluminium Arak in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on December 14, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Persepolis has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Aluminium Arak has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Persepolis scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 0.54. Aluminium Arak scores 0.62 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 1.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of Persepolis's games and 23% of Aluminium Arak's. The Over 2.5 rates are 23% and 15%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persepolis has the higher season xG average, 1.15 to 0.96 per game. Persepolis takes 3.5 shots per game, while Aluminium Arak takes 3.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Persepolis leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Aluminium Arak leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persepolis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Aluminium Arak, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.75 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persepolis | Aluminium Arak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.33 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.08 | 0.57 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persepolis is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Persepolis · 0.4 pts / game - Aluminium Arak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persepolis is 74% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - Persepolis · 0.62 goals / game - Aluminium Arak
Persepolis is 70% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.54 goals / game - Persepolis · 0.92 goals / game - Aluminium Arak
Persepolis scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Aluminium Arak keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).
Aluminium Arak scores in 54% of games (7 of 13 meczów), while Persepolis keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persepolis
Over / Under - Aluminium Arak
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persepolis is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / game - Persepolis · 1.23 pts / game - Aluminium Arak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persepolis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Aluminium Arak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persepolis
Aluminium Arak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Persepolis | Liga | Aluminium Arak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.62 | 1.75 | ▼ 1.54 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 39% | ▼ 23% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 23% | 24% | ▼ 15% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 41% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▼ 46% |
| Goal after half-time | • 62% | 61% | ▼ 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Persepolis 1:0 Aluminium Arak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak?
Persepolis score 1.08 goals per game on average and Aluminium Arak 0.62. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Persepolis's matches and 23% of Aluminium Arak's.
What form are Persepolis and Aluminium Arak in?
Over the last 5 games Persepolis have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Aluminium Arak 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persepolis vs Aluminium Arak: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.