Persib vs Persijap: match statistics
Persib vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persib played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 23, 2026. Venue: Stadion Gelora Bandung Lautan Api. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Persib has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Persijap has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Persib scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 0.67. Persijap scores 0.94 and allows 1.36. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 42% of Persib's games and 42% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 48%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persib has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.41 per game. Persib takes 14.8 shots per game, while Persijap takes 11.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Persib leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.55 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persib's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for Persib. The table-topping team has 24 wins, 6 draws and only 3 losses this season with a goal difference of 59:22, while Persijap has 9 wins, 8 draws and 16 losses with a 31:45 record. At home Persib wins 94% of matches, records 88% clean sheets and concedes only 0.19 goals per game while scoring 1.81 on average, whereas Persijap have 19% away wins, score 0.88 goals, concede 1.63 and fail to score in 50% of away fixtures. Persib also generates more quality chances: home xG is 1.75 versus Persijap’s 1.36 xG, and average shots on target are 6.38 vs 4.06, which is reflected in 9 goals for Persib in the last 5 matches compared to 5 for Persijap and 2.6 points per game for Persib in the last 5 fixtures versus 1.4 for Persijap. Considering the hosts’ defensive edge (0.19 conceded and 88% clean sheets at home) plus superior efficiency and chance creation, I assess Persib’s win probability at around 80%, a draw at 12% and an away win at 8%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis indicates a preference for BTTS: No. Persib has a seasonal BTTS rate of 47% and averages 1.0 goals per match, while Persijap has only 38% BTTS and averages 0.88 goals; in the last 5 matches Persib recorded BTTS in 60% of games, whereas Persijap in 0%, which is a strong signal against both teams scoring. Theoretically both teams generate goal potential (xG 1.46 for Persib and 1.36 for Persijap, combined ~2.82 versus the league average 2.77), but a low shot conversion rate of around 8% and the fact that Persijap has 25% of season matches with a clean sheet suggest they often fail to convert chances. Persib in the last 5 matches scored 1.8 and conceded 0.8, showing good defensive form for the home side; therefore, considering seasonal and recent trends, I tip No with a probability edge.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I model expected goals as the average of the home attack and away defense: Persib attack xG 1.46 vs xG conceded by Persijap 1.49 → ~1.48 goals for Persib; Persijap attack xG 1.36 vs xG conceded by Persib 1.43 → ~1.40 goals for Persijap, total 2.88. Seasonal indicators support this direction: share of matches over 1.5 is 76% for Persib and 75% for Persijap, while matches with over 0.5 goals occur in 82% and 88% of cases respectively. With an expected total of 2.88, a Poisson distribution gives ~78% probability for Over 1.5, ~55% for Over 2.5 and ~33% for Over 3.5, consistent with seasonal Over 2.5 around ~47–50%. Persib also has better last-5 form (1.8 goals and xG 1.58) while Persijap averages 1.0 goal in the last 5 and has a seasonal average conceded of 1.63, which increases goal likelihood. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 is moderately valueable, and Over 3.5 is too risky.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Persib holds a clear form advantage: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%), while Persijap has won 2 of 5 (40%), which favors the home side for the final result. At half-time Persib led in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and average 1.0 goals by the break versus 0.4 for Persijap, so a lead at the break for the hosts is realistic. Persib also has a higher xG of 1.46 compared to 1.36 and more shots on target (4.35 vs 4.06), while Persijap concedes 1.63 goals per game on average versus 1.12 for Persib, indicating superiority in chance creation and defense. Additionally the hosts have 71% of first halves without conceding and a low HT BTTS rate (6%), whereas goals occur more often after the break (82% of Persib’s second halves see at least one goal), therefore the strongest signal is Persib to lead at half-time and win at full-time (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persib | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persib is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Persib · 1.4 pts / game - Persijap
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persib is 90% better for: goals scored per game.
1.79 goals / game - Persib · 0.94 goals / game - Persijap
Persib is 103% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.67 goals / game - Persib · 1.36 goals / game - Persijap
Persib scores in 94% of games (31 of 33 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).
Persijap scores in 58% of games (19 of 33 meczów), while Persib keeps a clean sheet in 55% (18 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persib
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persib is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.85 pts / game - Persib · 1.09 pts / game - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persib - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persib
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persib | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.45 | 2.77 | ▼ 2.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 53% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 55% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 79% | 81% | ▼ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Persib's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Persijap. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persib vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished Persib 0:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persib vs Persijap?
Persib score 1.79 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.94. The Liga 1 average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Persib's matches and 42% of Persijap's.
What form are Persib and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games Persib have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Persijap 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persib vs Persijap?
The statistical background for Persib vs Persijap — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.