Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics
Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persijap played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on December 23, 2025. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Persijap has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Persijap scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.77. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.23 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 77% of Persijap's games and 46% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 69% and 38%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persijap has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.45 per game. Persijap takes 13.4 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Persijap leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.77 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persijap's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persijap | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 23% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Persijap · 1.23 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
PSIM Yogyakarta is 54% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.77 goals / game - Persijap · 1.15 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Persijap scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).
PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persijap
Over / Under - PSIM Yogyakarta
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSIM Yogyakarta is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / game - Persijap · 1.38 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persijap
PSIM Yogyakarta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persijap | Liga | PSIM Yogyakarta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.77 | 2.56 | ▼ 2.38 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 77% | 57% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 49% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 25% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 66% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 84% | • 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
The Liga 1 match finished Persijap 1:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
Persijap score 1.00 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 1.23. The Liga 1 average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Persijap's matches and 46% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.
What form are Persijap and PSIM Yogyakarta in?
Over the last 5 games Persijap have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Persijap vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.