Persik Kediri vs Persijap: match statistics
Persik Kediri vs Persijap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Persik Kediri played against Persijap in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on April 6, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Persik Kediri has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Persijap has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Persik Kediri scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 1.80. Persijap scores 0.88 and allows 1.64. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 76% of Persik Kediri's games and 52% of Persijap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 72% and 56%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Persik Kediri has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.41 per game. Persik Kediri takes 10.9 shots per game, while Persijap takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Persik Kediri leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.64 goals per game after halftime. Persijap leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Persik Kediri's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Persijap, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 1 games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Persik Kediri and I project a home victory. Persik averages 1.83 goals per home match versus Persijap’s 0.75 away, and average xG is 1.73 vs 1.33 in favor of the hosts. The hosts register more shots on target (5.67 vs 3.67), have higher finishing efficiency (14% vs 7%) and greater possession (57% vs 47%), translating into superior offensive threat. Defensively Persik concedes 1.50 goals per home game while Persijap concedes 2.08 on the road; additionally the hosts win 50% of matches at home versus just 8% away wins for Persijap, and the visitors have failed to score in 50% of their away fixtures. Although Persik’s last 5 games are weaker (0.8 points per game: 1 win, 1 draw, 3 losses) compared to Persijap (1.2 points per game), the superiority in quality of chances and efficiency leads to backing the home side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have season BTTS rates around the halfway mark: Persik 54% and Persijap 50%, while the league average is 55%, which slightly favors the 'Both Teams To Score' scenario. A strong signal comes from Persik’s form — BTTS in the last 5 matches is 80% and they conceded an average of 2.4 goals per game, whereas Persijap’s last 5 BTTS is 40% with 1.4 goals conceded on average. Both sides generate xG above 1.3 (Persik xG 1.49 vs Persijap 1.33) and concede xG of 1.36 vs 1.52, indicating they create chances but are also susceptible to goals conceded. Additionally, Persijap has only 8% clean sheets this season versus Persik’s 31%, and matches over 2.5 goals occur for both teams in 54% and 58% of cases, which further boosts BTTS probability. Considering Persik’s 80% BTTS in the last 5, the high recent average goals conceded (2.4 and 1.4 in the last 5) and the league BTTS average of 55%, I tip BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG I expect about 1.50 goals for Persik ((1.49 + 1.52)/2 ≈ 1.50) and 1.35 goals for Persijap ((1.33 + 1.36)/2 ≈ 1.35), totaling 2.85 goals. This exceeds the league average of 2.69 and aligns with season-long >1.5 match rates: 77% for Persik and 83% for Persijap. Persik have had 100% of their last 5 matches over 2.5 and conceded an average of 2.4 goals in those five, while Persijap conceded 1.4, which increases the risk of further goals. Shot stats (Persik 12.46 shots and 4.54 on target, Persijap 10.5 and 3.67) and conversion rates 8%/7% further support at least two goals. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5, while Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~64%) and Over 3.5 has low probability (~22%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Persik was level at half-time in 46% of matches and led at the break in 23%, while Persijap has never led at half-time (0%), making a draw the most common state after 45 minutes. By half-time Persik averages 0.31 goals versus 0.25 for the visitors, and Persijap concedes 1.08 goals on average before the break — giving the home side a slight advantage at the interval. Over the full match Persik scores 1.00 goal on average with an xG of 1.49 from 12.46 shots, whereas Persijap has an xG of 1.33, scores 0.75 goals and concedes 2.08 goals per game; the hosts also have a higher win rate (31% vs 8%). The second half often decides matches: Persik scored at least once after the break in 85% of games, and in the last five fixtures the hosts scored after half-time in 100% of cases, so the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of a draw at the interval and a home win (X/1) is the most justified.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Persik Kediri | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persijap is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Persik Kediri · 1.2 pts / game - Persijap
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Persik Kediri is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.28 goals / game - Persik Kediri · 0.88 goals / game - Persijap
Persijap is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.8 goals / game - Persik Kediri · 1.64 goals / game - Persijap
Persik Kediri scores in 80% of games (20 of 25 meczów), while Persijap keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 meczów).
Persijap scores in 60% of games (15 of 25 meczów), while Persik Kediri keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Persik Kediri
Over / Under - Persijap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Persik Kediri is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - Persik Kediri · 0.8 pts / game - Persijap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persik Kediri - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persijap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Persik Kediri
Persijap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persik Kediri | Liga | Persijap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.08 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 55% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 72% | 52% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 4% | 26% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 70% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 83% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Persik Kediri's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Persijap. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Persik Kediri vs Persijap?
The Liga 1 match finished Persik Kediri 0:0 Persijap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persik Kediri vs Persijap?
Persik Kediri score 1.28 goals per game on average and Persijap 0.88. The Liga 1 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Persik Kediri's matches and 52% of Persijap's.
What form are Persik Kediri and Persijap in?
Over the last 5 games Persik Kediri have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persijap 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persik Kediri vs Persijap?
The statistical background for Persik Kediri vs Persijap — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


