Persita vs Arema: match statistics
Persita vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Persita play Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The match date is 10 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Persita: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Arema: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Persita scores 1.12 and concedes 1.09 goals per match. Arema scores 1.56 and concedes 1.38. League average: 2.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Persita 38%, Arema 65%. Over 2.5: Persita 38%, Arema 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Arema has higher xG: 1.46 vs 1.26. Persita: 10.4 shots per match, Arema: 12.2.
Match halves
Persita: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.62. Arema: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Persita: 76-90+ (11 goals). Arema: 76-90+ (17 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga 1: 2.80 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Persita has a clear defensive advantage: at home they concede 0.69 goals per match on average, while Arema concedes 1.31 away; in the last five matches Persita has conceded 6 goals, Arema as many as 12. In attack the hosts score 1.69 goals at home on average with an average xG of 1.51, while Arema scores 1.15 away with xG 1.37, indicating slightly higher quality of chances created by Persita; additionally Persita’s conversion rate is 14% versus Arema’s 10%. Recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts — Persita averages 1.2 points per game in this run (record 2 wins/3 losses), Arema 0.4 points (0 wins, 2 draws, 3 losses). Persita’s home metrics are strong: 62% home wins and 38% clean sheets at home, versus 23% away wins and only 15% clean sheets for Arema. Considering the superior defense (0.69 vs 1.31 conceded per match), the xG advantage (1.51 vs 1.37) and markedly better form (1.2 vs 0.4 pts in the last 5), I predict a home victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Persita | Arema | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Arema is 125% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Persita · 1.8 pts / match - Arema
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arema is 39% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Persita · 1.56 goals / match - Arema
Persita is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.09 goals / match - Persita · 1.38 goals / match - Arema
Persita scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
Arema scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Persita keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Persita
Over / Under — Arema
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Arema is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Persita · 1.41 pts / match - Arema
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Persita - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Arema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Persita
Arema
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).
Teams vs league
| Persita | Liga | Arema | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 2.80 | ▲ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 54% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 27% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Persita 1 - 0 - 0 Arema. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Persita vs Arema?
The Liga 1 match finished Persita 0:1 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Persita vs Arema?
Persita score 1.12 goals per game on average and Arema 1.56. The Liga 1 average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Persita's matches and 65% of Arema's.
What form are Persita and Arema in?
Over the last 5 games Persita have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Arema 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Persita vs Arema?
The statistical background for Persita vs Arema — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.