Petrolul 52 vs Csikszereda: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
Petrolul 52 vs Csikszereda: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Petrolul 52 plays Csikszereda in Liga I (Romania). The game is scheduled for September 21, 2026. Venue: Stadionul Ilie Oană.
Recent form
Petrolul 52 has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Csikszereda has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Petrolul 52 scores 1.22 goals per game and allows 1.33. Csikszereda scores 0.67 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Petrolul 52's games and 44% of Csikszereda's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 56%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Petrolul 52 has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.05 per game. Petrolul 52 takes 12.3 shots per game, while Csikszereda takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Petrolul 52 leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.44 goals per game after halftime. Csikszereda leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
Petrolul 52's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). For Csikszereda, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga I games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Petrolul 52 | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Petrolul 52 is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Petrolul 52 · 0.2 pts / game - Csikszereda
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Petrolul 52 is 82% better for: goals scored per game.
1.22 goals / game - Petrolul 52 · 0.67 goals / game - Csikszereda
Petrolul 52 is 75% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Petrolul 52 · 2.33 goals / game - Csikszereda
Petrolul 52 scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Csikszereda keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).
Csikszereda scores in 44% of games (4 of 9 games), while Petrolul 52 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Petrolul 52
Over / Under - Csikszereda
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Petrolul 52 is 255% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.56 pts / game - Petrolul 52 · 0.44 pts / game - Csikszereda
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Petrolul 52 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Csikszereda - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Petrolul 52
Csikszereda
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).
Teams vs league
| Petrolul 52 | Liga | Csikszereda | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.56 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 76% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Petrolul 52's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Csikszereda. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
When do Petrolul 52 and Csikszereda play?
Petrolul 52 face Csikszereda on September 21, 2026 in Liga I at Stadionul Ilie Oană. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between Petrolul 52 and Csikszereda?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Petrolul 52 won 1, Csikszereda won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Petrolul 52 vs Csikszereda?
Petrolul 52 score 1.22 goals per game on average and Csikszereda 0.67. The Liga I average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Petrolul 52's matches and 44% of Csikszereda's.
What form are Petrolul 52 and Csikszereda in?
Over the last 5 games Petrolul 52 have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Csikszereda 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Petrolul 52 vs Csikszereda?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Petrolul 52 vs Csikszereda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.