Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics
Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pharco played against Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Pharco has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ceramica Cleopatra has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Pharco scores 0.42 goals per game and allows 0.83. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.25 and allows 0.42. Games in this league average 1.86 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Pharco's games and 17% of Ceramica Cleopatra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 8% and 17%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ceramica Cleopatra has the higher season xG average, 1.16 to 0.90 per game. Pharco takes 7.7 shots per game, while Ceramica Cleopatra takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Pharco leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.92 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pharco's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Ceramica Cleopatra, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.86 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pharco | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 63% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Pharco · 2.6 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 198% better for: goals scored per game.
0.42 goals / game - Pharco · 1.25 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra is 98% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Pharco · 0.42 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Pharco scores in 42% of games (5 of 12 meczów), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 67% (8 of 12 meczów).
Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Pharco keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pharco
Over / Under - Ceramica Cleopatra
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ceramica Cleopatra is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / game - Pharco · 1.33 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pharco - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pharco
Ceramica Cleopatra
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pharco | Liga | Ceramica Cleopatra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.25 | 1.86 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 42% | ▼ 17% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 8% | 32% | ▼ 17% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 42% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Pharco 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Pharco score 0.42 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.25. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Pharco's matches and 17% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.
What form are Pharco and Ceramica Cleopatra in?
Over the last 5 games Pharco have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pharco vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.