United States - MLSData current as of September 07, 2026

Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC: match statistics

Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Philadelphia Union played against Nashville SC in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Philadelphia Union has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Nashville SC has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Philadelphia Union scores 0.90 goals per game and allows 1.70. Nashville SC scores 2.33 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 3.23 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Philadelphia Union's games and 44% of Nashville SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 56%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Philadelphia Union has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.49 per game. Philadelphia Union takes 13.8 shots per game, while Nashville SC takes 12.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Philadelphia Union leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.70 goals per game after halftime. Nashville SC leads at halftime in 56% and scores 1.22 after halftime.

When the teams score

Philadelphia Union's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For Nashville SC, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.23 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win (Nashville SC): on the road this season they have 7 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, and in the last 5 matches they are 4-1 with 9 goals scored. Home side Philadelphia have only 1 win, 2 draws and 7 losses at home, scored 9 and conceded 17, with poor home form (run 'llld'). The gap is most pronounced in defense and efficiency — Nashville concedes 0.4 goals on average away and keep clean sheets in 60% of away games, whereas Philadelphia concede 1.25 at home and have 25% clean sheets. Offensively Philadelphia attempt more shots on average (14.5 vs 10.6) and have higher xG at home (1.69 vs 1.27), but convert that into just 0.5 goals with a 3% conversion rate, while Nashville score 1.0 goal on average away with a 9% conversion and 4.6 shots on target. Considering PPG in the last 5 matches (Nashville 2.4 vs Philadelphia 1.0), superior defense and higher efficiency, I assess the probabilities as: away win 65%, draw 20%, home win 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict No BTTS with a 60% vs 40% probability, because Nashville’s defense has a clear advantage in key metrics. Nashville keeps a clean sheet in 60% of matches and concedes only 0.4 goals per game on average, totaling 6 goals conceded this season, with a season BTTS rate of 20%, which strongly supports No Goal. Philadelphia has the better attack on paper (xG 1.76, averaging 15.25 shots and 7.25 shots on target per game with a high conversion rate of 26%) and a 75% BTTS rate at home, but the last 5 matches show Nashville in form (WWWWL) with 9 goals scored in that period. Given the visitors’ dominant clean sheet indicator and the low 0.4 average goals conceded, I rate the No BTTS signal as stronger than the home side’s offensive signals.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I base this on xG: Philadelphia xG_for 1.76 vs Nashville xG_against 1.10, and Nashville xG_for 1.27 vs Philadelphia xG_against 0.91; the averages of these pairs yield expected goals Home 1.43 and Away 1.09, totaling 2.52. A Poisson model at total 2.52 gives probabilities Over 1.5 ≈72%, Over 2.5 ≈46% and Over 3.5 ≈25%, therefore the strongest signal is at the 1.5 line. Philadelphia averages 15.25 shots with 7.25 on target and has a conversion rate of 26%, which, given xG 1.76, increases the risk of home goals; their matches this season have 100% over 1.5 goals. Nashville averages 10.6 shots (4.6 on target) with a 9% conversion and has a lower BTTS rate (20%), so they have less ability to respond, though their xG_against 1.10 does not rule out conceding. Given the 72% chance of Over 1.5 and strong support from the home team's shots and conversion stats, I recommend backing the over at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Philadelphia led at the break in 4 of 4 home matches this season (100%) and scored 11 first-half goals, averaging 2.25 goals in the first half, while Nashville averages only 0.2 first-half goals. Over the full 90 minutes the hosts score 4.0 goals per home game and have a 100% home win rate, whereas the away side scores 1.0 goals on the road and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of away matches. xG favors Philly 1.76 to 1.27 for Nashville, and shots on target 7.25 to 4.6, along with a high conversion rate of 26% versus 9%, confirm the hosts’ efficiency advantage. Given the hosts’ dominance in the first half and the conversion edge, the 1/1 HT/FT (lead at the break and full-time victory for the hosts) is assessed as the strongest scenario and therefore assigned the highest probability.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
16Shots8
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
4Shots on target1
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.66xG0.8
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
5Corners2
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
51Dangerous attacks28
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
14Fouls11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1Cards1
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.9Goals scored / game2.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.7Goals allowed / game0.67
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
49%Average possession54%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
3.7Shots on target / game5.78
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.8Shots per game12.67
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
3.7Shots on target5.78
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
6.5%Shot conversion18.4%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
49%Possession54%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.57xG for1.49
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.09xG against1.01
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Shooting quality

Philadelphia Union: BalancedNashville SC: Efficient finishing
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
Accuracy (shots on target)27%46%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nashville SC is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Philadelphia Union · 2.4 pts / game - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union
LWDDL
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nashville SC
WLWWW
Season result split
78% W11% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-1
2.44 pts / game · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-1
Last 5 away
3-1-1
DWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nashville SC is 159% better for: goals scored per game.

0.9 goals / game - Philadelphia Union · 2.33 goals / game - Nashville SC

Nashville SC is 154% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.7 goals / game - Philadelphia Union · 0.67 goals / game - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union scoring profile: mixed

Philadelphia Union scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Nashville SC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 meczów).

Nashville SC scoring profile: very strong

Nashville SC scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Philadelphia Union keeps a clean sheet in 10% (1 of 10 meczów).

9Goals scored (season)21
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
17Goals conceded (season)6
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
2.6Average goals per game3
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
6Goals scored (last 5)13
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal78%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%2 goals67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
10%3 goals44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%4 goals33%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
60%2 goals11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%3 goals0%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%4 goals0%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
Philadelphia Union - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 10 meczów
59%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
10%Scored in both halves56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
60%BTTS - last 540%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nashville SC is 233% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.6 pts / game - Philadelphia Union · 2 pts / game - Nashville SC

Philadelphia Union - half-time state
10% leading30% draw60% trailing
Nashville SC - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.6Points per game (1st half)2
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.2Goals scored (1st half)1.11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1Average goals (1st half)1.44
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
30%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
80%No goal before half-time44%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per game (2nd half)2.11
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.7Goals scored (2nd half)1.22
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.56
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC
50%No goal after half-time22%
Philadelphia UnionNashville SC

Philadelphia Union - second-half results

10% W50% R40% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Nashville SC - second-half results

56% W44% R0% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding139%

Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 78%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Philadelphia Union - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nashville SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game1.01.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Philadelphia Union
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
4
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Nashville SC
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
5
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
4
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Philadelphia Union

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.67
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
46%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

Nashville SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
185%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Philadelphia UnionLigaNashville SC
Average goals per game 2.603.23 3.00
Both teams scored 60%59% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%62% 56%
Clean sheets 10%23% 44%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 67%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.23
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.97
Home goals / game
1.26
Away goals / game
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Philadelphia UnionSubstitutionOn: Geiner Arleyson Martínez TurnerOff: Japhet Sery Larsen
  2. Philadelphia UnionYellow cardGeiner Arleyson Martínez Turner
  3. Nashville SCYellow cardDaniel Lovitz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

The MLS match finished Philadelphia Union 0:0 Nashville SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

Philadelphia Union score 0.90 goals per game on average and Nashville SC 2.33. The MLS average is 3.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Philadelphia Union's matches and 44% of Nashville SC's.

What form are Philadelphia Union and Nashville SC in?

Over the last 5 games Philadelphia Union have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Nashville SC 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Philadelphia Union vs Nashville SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.