Pianese vs Pontedera: match statistics
Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favour the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.
Pianese vs Pontedera: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pianese played against Pontedera in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Pianese has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Pontedera has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Pianese scores 1.03 goals per game and allows 0.93. Pontedera scores 0.80 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Pianese's games and 53% of Pontedera's. The Over 2.5 rates are 27% and 43%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pontedera has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.30 per game. Pianese takes 10.6 shots per game, while Pontedera takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Pianese leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Pontedera leads at halftime in 23% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pianese's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Pontedera, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pianese | Pontedera | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Pianese is 800% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Pianese · 0.2 pts / game - Pontedera
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Pianese is 29% better for: goals scored per game.
1.03 goals / game - Pianese · 0.8 goals / game - Pontedera
Pianese is 90% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.93 goals / game - Pianese · 1.77 goals / game - Pontedera
Pianese scores in 63% of games (19 of 30 meczów), while Pontedera keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 30 meczów).
Pontedera scores in 60% of games (18 of 30 meczów), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pianese
Over / Under - Pontedera
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Pianese is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.37 pts / game - Pianese · 0.93 pts / game - Pontedera
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pianese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Pontedera - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pianese
Pontedera
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Pianese | Liga | Pontedera | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.97 | 2.27 | ▲ 2.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 27% | 39% | ▲ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 37% | 29% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 63% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Pianese's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Pontedera. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pianese vs Pontedera?
The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 2:2 Pontedera. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Pontedera?
Pianese score 1.03 goals per game on average and Pontedera 0.80. The Serie C Group B average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pianese's matches and 53% of Pontedera's.
What form are Pianese and Pontedera in?
Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Pontedera 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Pontedera?
The statistical background for Pianese vs Pontedera — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.