Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 17 July 2026

Pianese vs Pontedera: match statistics

Pianese crest
Pianese
2 : 2half-time 0:0
Pontedera crest
Pontedera
165%(1.98)
X25%(2.97)
210%(4.15)

Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favour the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.

Pianese vs Pontedera: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pianese play Pontedera in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match date is 21 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Pianese: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Pontedera: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pianese scores 1.03 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Pontedera scores 0.75 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pianese 47%, Pontedera 50%. Over 2.5: Pianese 28%, Pontedera 42%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Pontedera has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.29. Pianese: 10.4 shots per match, Pontedera: 10.9.

Match halves

Pianese: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.50. Pontedera: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Pianese: 31-45+ (9 goals). Pontedera: 61-75 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Pianese are in decidedly better form, especially in home matches, where they win 40% of games and have a positive goal difference (+2). The hosts are unbeaten in their last five matches overall (2 wins, 3 draws) and average 1.8 points per game. Pontedera, on the other hand, perform very poorly away from home – they win only 7% of away matches, have a terrible goal difference (-16), and lose 67% of games as visitors. In their last five matches overall, Pontedera have averaged just 0.2 points per game, losing four out of five fixtures. The xG statistics also favour the hosts (1.38 vs 1.14), and Pianese score almost twice as many goals per home match as Pontedera do on the road. Considering all these factors, a Pianese victory is the most likely scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
PianesePontedera
14Shots16
PianesePontedera
5Shots on target5
PianesePontedera
1.67xG1.92
PianesePontedera
6Corners9
PianesePontedera
60Dangerous attacks78
PianesePontedera
10Fouls15
PianesePontedera
1Cards4
PianesePontedera

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.03Goals scored / match0.75
PianesePontedera
0.94Goals conceded / match1.72
PianesePontedera
42%Average possession44%
PianesePontedera
3.5Shots on target / match2.92
PianesePontedera

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.39Shots per match10.94
PianesePontedera
3.5Shots on target2.92
PianesePontedera
9.9%Shot conversion6.9%
PianesePontedera
42%Possession44%
PianesePontedera
1.29xG for1.31
PianesePontedera
1.35xG against1.45
PianesePontedera

Shooting quality

Pianese: BalancedPontedera: Balanced
PianesePontedera
Accuracy (shots on target)34%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pianese is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Pianese · 0.2 pts / match - Pontedera

Pianese
DLDDW
Season result split
31% W47% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-17-8
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-5
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.49BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Pontedera
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
8% W31% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-11-22
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -35
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-12
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pianese is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Pianese · 0.75 goals / match - Pontedera

Pianese is 83% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Pianese · 1.72 goals / match - Pontedera

Pianese scoring profile: very strong

Pianese scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Pontedera keeps a clean sheet in 8% (3 of 36 matches).

Pontedera scoring profile: mixed

Pontedera scores in 56% of matches (20 of 36 matches), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 36% (13 of 36 matches).

37Goals scored (season)27
PianesePontedera
34Goals conceded (season)62
PianesePontedera
1.97Average goals in match2.47
PianesePontedera
4Goals scored (last 5)1
PianesePontedera
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
PianesePontedera

How often they score at least...

61%1 goal56%
PianesePontedera
31%2 goals19%
PianesePontedera
8%3 goals0%
PianesePontedera
3%4 goals0%
PianesePontedera

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal92%
PianesePontedera
25%2 goals56%
PianesePontedera
3%3 goals17%
PianesePontedera
3%4 goals6%
PianesePontedera

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time6%
PianesePontedera
0%BTTS in both halves3%
PianesePontedera
11%Scored in both halves8%
PianesePontedera

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PianesePontedera
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
PianesePontedera
40%BTTS - last 520%
PianesePontedera

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
PianesePontedera
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time19%
PianesePontedera
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PianesePontedera

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PianesePontedera
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
PianesePontedera
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
PianesePontedera

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pianese is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Pianese · 0.86 pts / match - Pontedera

Pianese - half-time state
22% leading64% draw14% trailing
Pontedera - half-time state
19% leading28% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)0.86
PianesePontedera
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.25
PianesePontedera
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
PianesePontedera
0.89Average goals (1st half)1
PianesePontedera
69%Clean sheet before half-time44%
PianesePontedera
61%No goal before half-time75%
PianesePontedera

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)0.83
PianesePontedera
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
PianesePontedera
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.97
PianesePontedera
1.08Average goals (2nd half)1.47
PianesePontedera
56%Clean sheet after half-time25%
PianesePontedera
67%No goal after half-time61%
PianesePontedera

Pianese - second-half results

22% W42% R36% P
47
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pontedera - second-half results

17% W33% R50% P
31
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding42%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 8%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pianese - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Pontedera - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.00
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pianese
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
5
2
16-30
9
9
31-45
8
1
46-60
2
8
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Pontedera
ScoredConceded
1
11
0-15
3
9
16-30
5
7
31-45
5
11
46-60
7
9
61-75
6
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
49%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pianese

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Pontedera

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
146%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PianeseLigaPontedera
Average goals in match 1.972.26 2.47
Both teams scored 47%49% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 28%39% 42%
Clean sheets 36%31% 8%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 75%
Goal after half-time 67%72% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pianese 0 - 0 - 1 Pontedera. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

US Pontedera 1912
2 : 0
US Pianese ASD

FAQ

What was the result of Pianese vs Pontedera?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 2:2 Pontedera. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Pontedera?

Pianese score 1.03 goals per game on average and Pontedera 0.75. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pianese's matches and 50% of Pontedera's.

What form are Pianese and Pontedera in?

Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Pontedera 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Pontedera?

The statistical background for Pianese vs Pontedera — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.