Pianese vs Ternana: match statistics
Pianese vs Ternana: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pianese played against Ternana in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on December 21, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Pianese has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Ternana has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Pianese scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 1.00. Ternana scores 1.18 and allows 0.94. Games in this league average 2.23 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Pianese's games and 53% of Ternana's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 29%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ternana has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.22 per game. Pianese takes 9.8 shots per game, while Ternana takes 11.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Pianese leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.35 goals per game after halftime. Ternana leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pianese's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Ternana, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.23 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pianese | Ternana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ternana is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Pianese · 2 pts / game - Ternana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ternana is 26% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Pianese · 1.18 goals / game - Ternana
Ternana is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Pianese · 0.94 goals / game - Ternana
Pianese scores in 59% of games (10 of 17 meczów), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
Ternana scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Pianese keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pianese
Over / Under - Ternana
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pianese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ternana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pianese
Ternana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Pianese | Liga | Ternana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.94 | 2.23 | ▼ 2.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 47% | ▲ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 24% | 36% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 31% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 59% | • 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Pianese vs Ternana?
The Serie C Group B match finished Pianese 0:0 Ternana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pianese vs Ternana?
Pianese score 0.94 goals per game on average and Ternana 1.18. The Serie C Group B average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Pianese's matches and 53% of Ternana's.
What form are Pianese and Ternana in?
Over the last 5 games Pianese have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ternana 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pianese vs Ternana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.