Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates that both teams have balanced chances, which suggests a draw. Piast Gliwice has poor home efficiency (33% win rate), but is showing better recent form (2 wins in the last 5 matches) and a solid defense (42% clean sheets). Radomiak Radom has a very low away efficiency (only 8% win rate), but as many as 50% of their away matches end in a draw, confirming their defensive approach as visitors. Both teams have an identical points tally in their last 5 matches (1.2 PPG), and the goal difference (-1 for Piast, -10 for Radomiak) suggests a home advantage, but not enough to guarantee a certain victory. Considering Radomiak's high efficiency in scoring goals (low FTS% 17%) and their tendency to draw away, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.
Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Piast Gliwice played against Radomiak Radom in Ekstraklasa (Poland). The game was played on March 20, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Piast Gliwice has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Radomiak Radom has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Piast Gliwice scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.28. Radomiak Radom scores 1.64 and allows 1.48. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Piast Gliwice's games and 72% of Radomiak Radom's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 60%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Piast Gliwice has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.59 per game. Piast Gliwice takes 14.4 shots per game, while Radomiak Radom takes 14.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Piast Gliwice leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Radomiak Radom leads at halftime in 24% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Piast Gliwice's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Radomiak Radom, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ekstraklasa games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates that both teams have balanced chances, which suggests a draw. Piast Gliwice has poor home efficiency (33% win rate), but is showing better recent form (2 wins in the last 5 matches) and a solid defense (42% clean sheets). Radomiak Radom has a very low away efficiency (only 8% win rate), but as many as 50% of their away matches end in a draw, confirming their defensive approach as visitors. Both teams have an identical points tally in their last 5 matches (1.2 PPG), and the goal difference (-1 for Piast, -10 for Radomiak) suggests a home advantage, but not enough to guarantee a certain victory. Considering Radomiak's high efficiency in scoring goals (low FTS% 17%) and their tendency to draw away, the most probable outcome is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Piast Gliwice | Radomiak Radom | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 25% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Radomiak Radom is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
1.16 goals / game - Piast Gliwice · 1.64 goals / game - Radomiak Radom
Piast Gliwice is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.28 goals / game - Piast Gliwice · 1.48 goals / game - Radomiak Radom
Piast Gliwice scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 meczów), while Radomiak Radom keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 meczów).
Radomiak Radom scores in 84% of games (21 of 25 meczów), while Piast Gliwice keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Piast Gliwice
Over / Under - Radomiak Radom
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Radomiak Radom is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.92 pts / game - Piast Gliwice · 1.16 pts / game - Radomiak Radom
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Piast Gliwice - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Radomiak Radom - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Piast Gliwice
Radomiak Radom
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ekstraklasa).
Teams vs league
| Piast Gliwice | Liga | Radomiak Radom | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.44 | 2.74 | ▲ 3.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 52% | 53% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 25% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 74% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 77% | • 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Piast Gliwice's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Radomiak Radom. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom?
The Ekstraklasa match finished Piast Gliwice 3:1 Radomiak Radom. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom?
Piast Gliwice score 1.16 goals per game on average and Radomiak Radom 1.64. The Ekstraklasa average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Piast Gliwice's matches and 72% of Radomiak Radom's.
What form are Piast Gliwice and Radomiak Radom in?
Over the last 5 games Piast Gliwice have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Radomiak Radom 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom?
The statistical background for Piast Gliwice vs Radomiak Radom — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.