Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of September 13, 2026

Picerno vs Monopoli: match statistics

Picerno crest
Picerno
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Monopoli crest
Monopoli

Picerno vs Monopoli: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Picerno played against Monopoli in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 29, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Picerno has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Monopoli has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Picerno scores 1.12 goals per game and allows 1.55. Monopoli scores 1.06 and allows 1.09. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 64% of Picerno's games and 48% of Monopoli's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 36%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Monopoli has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.16 per game. Picerno takes 9.0 shots per game, while Monopoli takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Picerno leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.39 goals per game after halftime. Monopoli leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

Picerno's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (10 goals). For Monopoli, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Serie C Group C games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistics point to an even game with a draw bias: Picerno have high home draw rates (Draw% 50%) and low win rate (Win% 19%), while Monopoli show better recent form and higher PPG (1.4 vs 0.6). Both teams have similar xG and shots per match; visitors display weaker away finishing (0.88 goals/match, FTS 38%), limiting their offensive potential. Picerno concede 1.25 at home on average, Monopoli have similar GA away (1.19), so a low-scoring contest and difficulty breaking the opponent are expected. Considering the defensive balance and hosts’ draw history, a draw seems most likely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Home Picerno season BTTS 59% and a high number of goals conceded (ga_season_home 51) increase the risk of the opponent scoring. Monopoli last5 BTTS 80% and regular away goals (gf_last5_away 6, last5_seasonScoredAVG_overall_away 1.2). Similar xG (1.28 vs 1.22) and shot counts suggest both sides can create chances. Low CS rates (24% hosts, 38% visitors) and high last5 xG_against_home (1.58) further support both teams scoring. Overall form and stats point to BTTS = Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and shot averages point to a moderately offensive match with combined xG ~2.49, giving high probability for over 1.5 goals. Season Over 2.5 rates for both teams are near the threshold (35–38%), putting 2.5 around 50/50. Low conversion and relatively high goals conceded by Picerno plus Monopoli’s moderate capabilities favor goals but not extreme scores. A clearer signal is the low frequency of >3.5 games (only 12–19% season), so the safest option is Under 3.5. Summary: expected ~1–2 goals per team, low chance of 4+ goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Data indicate a high probability of a draw at half-time (drawingAtHT ~50–53%), alongside Picerno’s second-half strength and better season home metrics (PPG, wins, xG). Picerno has a clear home advantage and wins more matches in the second half, supporting a comeback after HT and a home victory. Low opponent scoring efficiency before the break and a high share of second-half goals suggest X/1 as the strongest scenario. The probability of the visitors leading at HT is relatively small, so combinations starting with “2” are minimal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

62Possession (%)38
PicernoMonopoli
10Shots8
PicernoMonopoli
1Shots on target3
PicernoMonopoli
1.24xG1.16
PicernoMonopoli
4Corners1
PicernoMonopoli
73Dangerous attacks61
PicernoMonopoli
17Fouls21
PicernoMonopoli
1Cards4
PicernoMonopoli

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.12Goals scored / game1.06
PicernoMonopoli
1.55Goals allowed / game1.09
PicernoMonopoli
48%Average possession52%
PicernoMonopoli
3.06Shots on target / game3.3
PicernoMonopoli

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.03Shots per game9.73
PicernoMonopoli
3.06Shots on target3.3
PicernoMonopoli
12.4%Shot conversion10.9%
PicernoMonopoli
48%Possession52%
PicernoMonopoli
1.16xG for1.25
PicernoMonopoli
1.64xG against1.23
PicernoMonopoli

Shooting quality

Picerno: BalancedMonopoli: Balanced
PicernoMonopoli
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Monopoli is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Picerno · 1.4 pts / game - Monopoli

Picerno
DDLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
21% W33% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-11-15
0.97 pts / game · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-5
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Monopoli
DLWLW
Season result split
42% W24% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-8-11
1.52 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Picerno is 6% better for: goals scored per game.

1.12 goals / game - Picerno · 1.06 goals / game - Monopoli

Monopoli is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - Picerno · 1.09 goals / game - Monopoli

Picerno scoring profile: strong

Picerno scores in 73% of games (24 of 33 meczów), while Monopoli keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 meczów).

Monopoli scoring profile: very strong

Monopoli scores in 73% of games (24 of 33 meczów), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 meczów).

37Goals scored (season)35
PicernoMonopoli
51Goals conceded (season)36
PicernoMonopoli
2.67Average goals per game2.15
PicernoMonopoli
3Goals scored (last 5)6
PicernoMonopoli
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
PicernoMonopoli

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal73%
PicernoMonopoli
36%2 goals27%
PicernoMonopoli
3%3 goals6%
PicernoMonopoli
0%4 goals0%
PicernoMonopoli

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal70%
PicernoMonopoli
52%2 goals30%
PicernoMonopoli
9%3 goals6%
PicernoMonopoli
3%4 goals3%
PicernoMonopoli

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time9%
PicernoMonopoli
0%BTTS in both halves3%
PicernoMonopoli
18%Scored in both halves15%
PicernoMonopoli

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
PicernoMonopoli
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
PicernoMonopoli
60%BTTS - last 580%
PicernoMonopoli

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
PicernoMonopoli
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
PicernoMonopoli
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PicernoMonopoli

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
PicernoMonopoli
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
PicernoMonopoli
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
PicernoMonopoli

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Picerno is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / game - Picerno · 0.79 pts / game - Monopoli

Picerno - half-time state
39% leading30% draw30% trailing
Monopoli - half-time state
9% leading52% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per game (1st half)0.79
PicernoMonopoli
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.21
PicernoMonopoli
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.55
PicernoMonopoli
1.42Average goals (1st half)0.76
PicernoMonopoli
52%Clean sheet before half-time52%
PicernoMonopoli
45%No goal before half-time82%
PicernoMonopoli

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.7
PicernoMonopoli
0.39Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
PicernoMonopoli
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
PicernoMonopoli
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.39
PicernoMonopoli
39%Clean sheet after half-time58%
PicernoMonopoli
64%No goal after half-time30%
PicernoMonopoli

Picerno - second-half results

21% W36% D42% L
49
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding54%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Monopoli - second-half results

45% W33% D21% L
26
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
56
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding467%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Picerno - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Monopoli - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.80
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Picerno
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
10
8
16-30
6
7
31-45
3
8
46-60
3
6
61-75
7
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Monopoli
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
8
16-30
3
4
31-45
11
4
46-60
10
4
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.41
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Picerno

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
152%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Monopoli

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

PicernoLigaMonopoli
Average goals per game 2.672.49 2.15
Both teams scored 64%50% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%47% 36%
Clean sheets 15%29% 30%
Goal before half-time 82%66% 58%
Goal after half-time 79%79% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.02
Away goals / game
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. MonopoliYellow cardDiego Ronco
  2. MonopoliYellow cardStefano Piccinini
  3. PicernoSubstitutionOn: Pasquale MaiorinoOff: Mamadou Yaye Kanoute
  4. PicernoYellow cardGabriele Bellodi
  5. MonopoliRed cardClaudio Manzi
  6. MonopoliSubstitutionOn: Davide BoveOff: Salvatore Longo
  7. PicernoSubstitutionOn: Karim CardoniOff: Sebastiano Bianchi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Picerno's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Monopoli. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Picerno vs Monopoli?

The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 0:0 Monopoli. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Monopoli?

Picerno score 1.12 goals per game on average and Monopoli 1.06. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Picerno's matches and 48% of Monopoli's.

What form are Picerno and Monopoli in?

Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Monopoli 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Monopoli?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.