Italy - Serie C Group CData current as of 19 July 2026

Picerno vs Team Altamura: match statistics

Picerno crest
Picerno
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Team Altamura crest
Team Altamura
150%(1.98)
X30%(3.30)
220%(3.70)

Picerno presents a clear advantage in home play, boasting better offensive statistics at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per home match with 54% possession, while Team Altamura faces serious efficiency issues on the road, scoring only 0.64 goals on average and failing to score in 43% of away matches. The form of both teams in the last five games is identical (1.8 points per match), yet Picerno holds a better goal difference in recent outings (7:4 vs 5:5). xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.3 vs 0.9 for the visitors away), suggesting superior quality in chance creation. Considering Picerno's home advantage and Team Altamura's offensive weakness on the road, a home victory is the most probable scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (43% clean sheets) could result in a tight match.

Picerno vs Team Altamura: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Picerno play Team Altamura in Serie C Group C (Italy). The match date is 28 February 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Picerno: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Team Altamura: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Picerno scores 1.13 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Team Altamura scores 0.84 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Picerno 63%, Team Altamura 47%. Over 2.5: Picerno 55%, Team Altamura 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Picerno has higher xG: 1.17 vs 0.95. Picerno: 9.1 shots per match, Team Altamura: 7.6.

Match halves

Picerno: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.42. Team Altamura: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.42.

Goals by minute

Picerno: 16-30 (12 goals). Team Altamura: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group C: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Picerno presents a clear advantage in home play, boasting better offensive statistics at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per home match with 54% possession, while Team Altamura faces serious efficiency issues on the road, scoring only 0.64 goals on average and failing to score in 43% of away matches. The form of both teams in the last five games is identical (1.8 points per match), yet Picerno holds a better goal difference in recent outings (7:4 vs 5:5). xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.3 vs 0.9 for the visitors away), suggesting superior quality in chance creation. Considering Picerno's home advantage and Team Altamura's offensive weakness on the road, a home victory is the most probable scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (43% clean sheets) could result in a tight match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
PicernoTeam Altamura
7Shots8
PicernoTeam Altamura
3Shots on target4
PicernoTeam Altamura
0.96xG1.1
PicernoTeam Altamura
5Corners2
PicernoTeam Altamura
41Dangerous attacks42
PicernoTeam Altamura
11Fouls20
PicernoTeam Altamura
1Cards2
PicernoTeam Altamura

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PicernoTeam Altamura
1.13Goals scored / match0.84
PicernoTeam Altamura
1.45Goals conceded / match1.29
PicernoTeam Altamura
49%Average possession46%
PicernoTeam Altamura
3.03Shots on target / match2.16
PicernoTeam Altamura

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.13Shots per match7.61
PicernoTeam Altamura
3.03Shots on target2.16
PicernoTeam Altamura
12.4%Shot conversion11.1%
PicernoTeam Altamura
49%Possession46%
PicernoTeam Altamura
1.17xG for0.95
PicernoTeam Altamura
1.6xG against1.44
PicernoTeam Altamura

Shooting quality

Picerno: BalancedTeam Altamura: Balanced
PicernoTeam Altamura
Accuracy (shots on target)33%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Picerno is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Picerno · 1 pts / match - Team Altamura

Picerno
DWWLD
Season result split
24% W34% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-16
1.05 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-10-5
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Team Altamura
WLDDL
Season result split
29% W32% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-12-15
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-8
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.84Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Picerno is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.13 goals / match - Picerno · 0.84 goals / match - Team Altamura

Team Altamura is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Picerno · 1.29 goals / match - Team Altamura

Picerno scoring profile: strong

Picerno scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Team Altamura keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

Team Altamura scoring profile: very strong

Team Altamura scores in 68% of matches (26 of 38 matches), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).

43Goals scored (season)32
PicernoTeam Altamura
55Goals conceded (season)49
PicernoTeam Altamura
2.58Average goals in match2.13
PicernoTeam Altamura
6Goals scored (last 5)3
PicernoTeam Altamura
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
PicernoTeam Altamura

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal68%
PicernoTeam Altamura
37%2 goals13%
PicernoTeam Altamura
5%3 goals3%
PicernoTeam Altamura
0%4 goals0%
PicernoTeam Altamura

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal71%
PicernoTeam Altamura
47%2 goals37%
PicernoTeam Altamura
8%3 goals13%
PicernoTeam Altamura
3%4 goals8%
PicernoTeam Altamura

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time8%
PicernoTeam Altamura
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PicernoTeam Altamura
18%Scored in both halves5%
PicernoTeam Altamura

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
PicernoTeam Altamura
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
PicernoTeam Altamura
60%BTTS - last 540%
PicernoTeam Altamura

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
PicernoTeam Altamura
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
PicernoTeam Altamura
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
PicernoTeam Altamura

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
PicernoTeam Altamura
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
PicernoTeam Altamura
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PicernoTeam Altamura

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Picerno is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Picerno · 1.13 pts / match - Team Altamura

Picerno - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
Team Altamura - half-time state
26% leading34% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.13
PicernoTeam Altamura
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.42
PicernoTeam Altamura
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
PicernoTeam Altamura
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.11
PicernoTeam Altamura
53%Clean sheet before half-time55%
PicernoTeam Altamura
47%No goal before half-time66%
PicernoTeam Altamura

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per match (2nd half)1.18
PicernoTeam Altamura
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.42
PicernoTeam Altamura
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
PicernoTeam Altamura
1.21Average goals (2nd half)1.03
PicernoTeam Altamura
45%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PicernoTeam Altamura
63%No goal after half-time61%
PicernoTeam Altamura

Picerno - second-half results

21% W39% R39% P
56
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 24%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Team Altamura - second-half results

26% W39% R34% P
43
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Picerno - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Team Altamura - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Picerno
ScoredConceded
8
10
0-15
12
8
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
9
46-60
5
6
61-75
7
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Team Altamura
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
3
9
16-30
8
12
31-45
7
7
46-60
3
6
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.35
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+70%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Picerno

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
141%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.55
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Team Altamura

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).

Teams vs league

PicernoLigaTeam Altamura
Average goals in match 2.582.49 2.13
Both teams scored 63%51% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%46% 37%
Clean sheets 18%28% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%67% 71%
Goal after half-time 74%79% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.03
Away goals / match
+42%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Picerno 0 - 0 - 1 Team Altamura. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

ASD Team Altamura
3 : 1
AZ Picerno ASD

FAQ

What was the result of Picerno vs Team Altamura?

The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 0:0 Team Altamura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Team Altamura?

Picerno score 1.13 goals per game on average and Team Altamura 0.84. The Serie C Group C average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Picerno's matches and 47% of Team Altamura's.

What form are Picerno and Team Altamura in?

Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Team Altamura 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Team Altamura?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.