Picerno vs Team Altamura: match statistics
Picerno presents a clear advantage in home play, boasting better offensive statistics at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per home match with 54% possession, while Team Altamura faces serious efficiency issues on the road, scoring only 0.64 goals on average and failing to score in 43% of away matches. The form of both teams in the last five games is identical (1.8 points per match), yet Picerno holds a better goal difference in recent outings (7:4 vs 5:5). xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.3 vs 0.9 for the visitors away), suggesting superior quality in chance creation. Considering Picerno's home advantage and Team Altamura's offensive weakness on the road, a home victory is the most probable scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (43% clean sheets) could result in a tight match.
Picerno vs Team Altamura: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Picerno played against Team Altamura in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Picerno has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Team Altamura has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Picerno scores 1.21 goals per game and allows 1.61. Team Altamura scores 0.93 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Picerno's games and 50% of Team Altamura's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 39%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Picerno has the higher season xG average, 1.14 to 0.97 per game. Picerno takes 9.0 shots per game, while Team Altamura takes 7.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Picerno leads at halftime in 39% of its games and scores 0.46 goals per game after halftime. Team Altamura leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
Picerno's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Team Altamura, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.48 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Picerno presents a clear advantage in home play, boasting better offensive statistics at their own stadium. The hosts score an average of 1.31 goals per home match with 54% possession, while Team Altamura faces serious efficiency issues on the road, scoring only 0.64 goals on average and failing to score in 43% of away matches. The form of both teams in the last five games is identical (1.8 points per match), yet Picerno holds a better goal difference in recent outings (7:4 vs 5:5). xG statistics also favor the hosts (1.3 vs 0.9 for the visitors away), suggesting superior quality in chance creation. Considering Picerno's home advantage and Team Altamura's offensive weakness on the road, a home victory is the most probable scenario, although the visitors' solid defense (43% clean sheets) could result in a tight match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Picerno | Team Altamura | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Picerno is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1.21 goals / game - Picerno · 0.93 goals / game - Team Altamura
Team Altamura is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.61 goals / game - Picerno · 1.29 goals / game - Team Altamura
Picerno scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 meczów), while Team Altamura keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).
Team Altamura scores in 71% of games (20 of 28 meczów), while Picerno keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Picerno
Over / Under - Team Altamura
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Picerno is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / game - Picerno · 1.21 pts / game - Team Altamura
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Picerno - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Team Altamura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Picerno
Team Altamura
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Picerno | Liga | Team Altamura | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.82 | 2.48 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 47% | ▼ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 65% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Picerno's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Team Altamura. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Picerno vs Team Altamura?
The Serie C Group C match finished Picerno 0:0 Team Altamura. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Picerno vs Team Altamura?
Picerno score 1.21 goals per game on average and Team Altamura 0.93. The Serie C Group C average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Picerno's matches and 50% of Team Altamura's.
What form are Picerno and Team Altamura in?
Over the last 5 games Picerno have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Team Altamura 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Picerno vs Team Altamura?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.