Italy - Serie C Group BData current as of 19 July 2026

Pineto vs Ternana: match statistics

Pineto crest
Pineto
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Ternana crest
Ternana
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest with an advantage for a draw. Pineto shows solid home form with a 42% win rate and only 8% of matches without a goal scored, averaging 1.5 goals per game. Ternana in away matches is characterized by defensive stability (0.92 goals conceded on average), but as many as 42% of their games end without scoring, with low offensive efficiency (0.92 goals per match). The recent form over the last five matches favors the visitors (2 PTS/match vs 1 PTS/match), however, Ternana's 50% draw rate away and a goal difference of 0 suggest a tendency to split points. Considering Pineto's home advantage and Ternana's defensive solidity, the most likely scenario is a draw.

Pineto vs Ternana: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pineto play Ternana in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match date is 16 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Pineto: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Ternana: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pineto scores 1.17 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Ternana scores 1.22 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pineto 47%, Ternana 56%. Over 2.5: Pineto 42%, Ternana 42%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Ternana has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.30. Pineto: 10.7 shots per match, Ternana: 12.1.

Match halves

Pineto: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.42. Ternana: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Pineto: 0-15 (11 goals). Ternana: 61-75 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis points to a balanced contest with an advantage for a draw. Pineto shows solid home form with a 42% win rate and only 8% of matches without a goal scored, averaging 1.5 goals per game. Ternana in away matches is characterized by defensive stability (0.92 goals conceded on average), but as many as 42% of their games end without scoring, with low offensive efficiency (0.92 goals per match). The recent form over the last five matches favors the visitors (2 PTS/match vs 1 PTS/match), however, Ternana's 50% draw rate away and a goal difference of 0 suggest a tendency to split points. Considering Pineto's home advantage and Ternana's defensive solidity, the most likely scenario is a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
PinetoTernana
14Shots9
PinetoTernana
5Shots on target6
PinetoTernana
1.76xG1.36
PinetoTernana
5Corners2
PinetoTernana
70Dangerous attacks50
PinetoTernana
17Fouls21
PinetoTernana
3Cards1
PinetoTernana

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match1.22
PinetoTernana
1.25Goals conceded / match1.11
PinetoTernana
49%Average possession52%
PinetoTernana
3.75Shots on target / match3.97
PinetoTernana

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.72Shots per match12.14
PinetoTernana
3.75Shots on target3.97
PinetoTernana
10.9%Shot conversion10.1%
PinetoTernana
49%Possession52%
PinetoTernana
1.3xG for1.62
PinetoTernana
1.39xG against1.22
PinetoTernana

Shooting quality

Pineto: BalancedTernana: Balanced
PinetoTernana
Accuracy (shots on target)35%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ternana is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Pineto · 1 pts / match - Ternana

Pineto
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
36% W31% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-11-12
1.39 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Ternana
DLDWL
Season result split
39% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-11
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-7-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ternana is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Pineto · 1.11 goals / match - Ternana

Pineto scoring profile: very strong

Pineto scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while Ternana keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Ternana scoring profile: strong

Ternana scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Pineto keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).

42Goals scored (season)44
PinetoTernana
45Goals conceded (season)40
PinetoTernana
2.42Average goals in match2.33
PinetoTernana
1Goals scored (last 5)7
PinetoTernana
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
PinetoTernana

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal75%
PinetoTernana
31%2 goals42%
PinetoTernana
14%3 goals6%
PinetoTernana
0%4 goals0%
PinetoTernana

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal75%
PinetoTernana
31%2 goals25%
PinetoTernana
22%3 goals8%
PinetoTernana
3%4 goals3%
PinetoTernana

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
PinetoTernana
3%BTTS in both halves6%
PinetoTernana
17%Scored in both halves36%
PinetoTernana

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
PinetoTernana
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
PinetoTernana
20%BTTS - last 5100%
PinetoTernana

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
PinetoTernana
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
PinetoTernana
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PinetoTernana

2nd half

61%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
PinetoTernana
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
PinetoTernana
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
PinetoTernana

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pineto is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.42 pts / match - Pineto · 1.28 pts / match - Ternana

Pineto - half-time state
36% leading33% draw31% trailing
Ternana - half-time state
25% leading53% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.42Points per match (1st half)1.28
PinetoTernana
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.53
PinetoTernana
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
PinetoTernana
1.39Average goals (1st half)1
PinetoTernana
53%Clean sheet before half-time61%
PinetoTernana
44%No goal before half-time53%
PinetoTernana

After half-time (2nd half)

1.08Points per match (2nd half)1.5
PinetoTernana
0.42Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
PinetoTernana
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
PinetoTernana
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.33
PinetoTernana
53%Clean sheet after half-time53%
PinetoTernana
67%No goal after half-time36%
PinetoTernana

Pineto - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
51
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.42
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ternana - second-half results

39% W33% R28% P
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pineto - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal100%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ternana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pineto
ScoredConceded
11
2
0-15
8
12
16-30
8
9
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
9
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ternana
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
8
31-45
7
8
46-60
10
6
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pineto

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.99
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Ternana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

PinetoLigaTernana
Average goals in match 2.422.26 2.33
Both teams scored 47%49% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%39% 42%
Clean sheets 31%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 81%63% 64%
Goal after half-time 61%72% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+9%
Home attack advantage
+8%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pineto 0 - 0 - 1 Ternana. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Ternana Calcio
2 : 1
ASD Pineto Calcio

FAQ

What was the result of Pineto vs Ternana?

The Serie C Group B match finished Pineto 0:3 Ternana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pineto vs Ternana?

Pineto score 1.17 goals per game on average and Ternana 1.22. The Serie C Group B average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Pineto's matches and 56% of Ternana's.

What form are Pineto and Ternana in?

Over the last 5 games Pineto have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Ternana 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pineto vs Ternana?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pineto vs Ternana: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.