United States - USL ChampionshipHighmark StadiumData current as of September 07, 2026

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC: match statistics

Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Pittsburgh Riverhounds played against Brooklyn FC in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on July 4, 2026. Venue: Highmark Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Pittsburgh Riverhounds has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Brooklyn FC has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.08. Brooklyn FC scores 1.00 and allows 1.85. Games in this league average 2.81 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 42% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's games and 46% of Brooklyn FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 62%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Brooklyn FC has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.23 per game. Pittsburgh Riverhounds takes 9.6 shots per game, while Brooklyn FC takes 11.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Pittsburgh Riverhounds leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Brooklyn FC leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.38 after halftime.

When the teams score

Pittsburgh Riverhounds's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Brooklyn FC, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.81 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Pittsburgh Riverhounds are the favorites: they sit 8th in the table versus Brooklyn FC’s 24th, and at home they record an 80% win rate, scoring on average 1.6 goals and conceding 0.8 per match. In their last 5 matches Riverhounds have scored 4 and conceded 1 (averaging 0.8 scored and 0.2 conceded per match), yielding an average of 1.8 points per game and an unbeaten run (W-D-W-D-W). Brooklyn in their last 5 fixtures scored 10 goals but conceded 11 and average only 1.0 point per game; additionally they have no away wins (0% win rate) and concede on average 2.83 goals away. Chance quality is similar (home offensive xG 1.37 for Pittsburgh vs away xG 1.36 for Brooklyn), but the home defense is superior — average xG against 1.19 vs 1.83 for the visitors. Furthermore, Riverhounds have a higher conversion rate (14% vs 11%) and 40% clean sheets at home versus 0% away clean sheets for Brooklyn, therefore I tip a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I lean towards BTTS - Yes due to the away profile: Brooklyn FC have 67% of matches with both teams scoring this season and 80% in the last 5, while conceding on average 2.83 goals per game this season and 11 goals in the last 5. Hosts Pittsburgh Riverhounds show a low BTTS rate: 29% this season and 20% in the last 5; they have scored 15 and conceded 13 this season (avg 1.0 goals conceded per game). However their offensive xG is 1.54 versus an actual average of 0.86 goals per game, indicating they generate >1.5 xG and can exploit the visitors’ defensive weakness. Additionally Brooklyn are involved in over 2.5 goals in 100% of this season’s matches, and 67% of their matches are both over 2.5 and BTTS, which, combined with the league average of 2.8 goals per game, increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Average shots on target are similar (4.86 vs 4.67), and the visitors have better shot conversion (11% vs hosts’ 7%), therefore I assess BTTS probability at 65% (Yes) and 35% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and defensive metrics projects 1.69 expected goals for Pittsburgh (xG_for 1.54 vs opponent xG_against 1.83) and 1.48 for Brooklyn (xG_for 1.36 vs home xG_against 1.61), totaling ~3.17 goals. A 3.17 total shifts the distribution toward more scoring: under a Poisson model the probability of Over 1.5 goals is ~83%, Over 2.5 ~61%, and Over 3.5 ~39%. Match data corroborate this risk: Brooklyn records 100% of games Over 2.5 this season and 67% Over 3.5, and in their last 5 away matches Over 2.5 is 80%, while the home side posts lower figures (home Over 2.5 29%). Brooklyn concedes an average of 2.83 goals per game and has 100% of matches with at least one goal conceded, which raises the likelihood of Pittsburgh goals despite Pittsburgh’s season home scoring of 0.86 (though xG_for_home 1.54 indicates greater potential). Consequently the strongest signal in the data is Over 1.5 (highest estimated probability ~83%), so I recommend taking the Over at 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select X/1 (draw at half-time, Pittsburgh to win) as the most likely scenario. A draw at the break appears realistic because in the last 5 matches Pittsburgh has been level at half-time in 80% of games, and seasonally home teams have led at half-time in 43% of matches versus 17% for Brooklyn. After the break I expect the hosts to gain the advantage: Pittsburgh has earned 9 points in second halves compared to only 1 point for the visitors and averages 1.29 points per match after the break versus 0.17 for Brooklyn, while the visitors concede on average 1.83 goals after half-time. Additionally, the hosts’ xG is 1.54 versus 1.36 for Brooklyn and the home side averages 12 shots per match compared to 10.5 for the away side, with the visitors conceding 2.83 goals per match on the season, which favors a turnaround in the second half. In summary, given Pittsburgh’s 80% HT draws, superior xG and Brooklyn’s weaker second-half profile, the most likely outcome is a draw at half-time and a home victory after 90 minutes.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

49Possession (%)51
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
9Shots5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
2Shots on target3
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.15xG0.77
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
6Corners4
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
59Dangerous attacks33
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
12Fouls19
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
4Cards3
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.25Goals scored / game1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.08Goals allowed / game1.85
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
50%Average possession49%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
3.58Shots on target / game4.85
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.58Shots per game11.38
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
3.58Shots on target4.85
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
13%Shot conversion8.8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
50%Possession49%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.23xG for1.47
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.35xG against1.71
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Shooting quality

Pittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishingBrooklyn FC: Balanced
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
Accuracy (shots on target)37%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 0.4 pts / game - Brooklyn FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
LWWWD
Season result split
50% W17% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-4
1.67 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Brooklyn FC
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
15% W23% R62% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-8
0.69 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1 goals / game - Brooklyn FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.08 goals / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.85 goals / game - Brooklyn FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: very strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

Brooklyn FC scoring profile: strong

Brooklyn FC scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)13
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
13Goals conceded (season)24
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
2.33Average goals per game2.85
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1Goals conceded (last 5)11
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal62%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
42%2 goals31%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
17%3 goals8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0%4 goals0%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal85%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
33%2 goals62%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
8%3 goals31%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0%4 goals8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

42%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 12 meczów
56%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time23%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
8%BTTS in both halves15%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
33%Scored in both halves23%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0%BTTS - last 560%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time31%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Brooklyn FC is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds · 1.23 pts / game - Brooklyn FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
25% leading42% draw33% trailing
Brooklyn FC - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.23
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.62
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.46
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
58%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
67%No goal before half-time54%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.58Points per game (2nd half)0.77
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.38
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC
33%No goal after half-time62%
Pittsburgh RiverhoundsBrooklyn FC

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Brooklyn FC - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.00
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game0.21.0
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Brooklyn FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.81.4
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
2
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Brooklyn FC
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
0
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Brooklyn FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Pittsburgh RiverhoundsLigaBrooklyn FC
Average goals per game 2.332.81 2.85
Both teams scored 42%56% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%52% 62%
Clean sheets 33%27% 15%
Goal before half-time 67%67% 85%
Goal after half-time 83%80% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.81
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Brooklyn FCYellow cardStefan Stojanovic
  2. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Trevor AmannOff: Maximiliano Viera
  3. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardTrevor Amann
  4. Brooklyn FCYellow cardStefan Stojanovic
  5. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsRed cardAlbert Dikwa Lega
  6. Brooklyn FCYellow cardCallum Frogson
  7. Brooklyn FCSubstitutionOn: Abdoulaye KanteOff: Thomas McNamara
  8. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardLasse Jonathan Kelp
  9. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Jorge GarciaOff: Perrin Barnes
  10. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Jackson WaltiOff: Daniel Griffin

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC?

The USL Championship match finished Pittsburgh Riverhounds 0:2 Brooklyn FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC?

Pittsburgh Riverhounds score 1.25 goals per game on average and Brooklyn FC 1.00. The USL Championship average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's matches and 46% of Brooklyn FC's.

What form are Pittsburgh Riverhounds and Brooklyn FC in?

Over the last 5 games Pittsburgh Riverhounds have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Brooklyn FC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pittsburgh Riverhounds vs Brooklyn FC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.