PK-35 vs KäPa: match statistics
PK-35 vs KäPa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PK-35 played against KäPa in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 10, 2026. Venue: Mustapekka Areena. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
PK-35 has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. KäPa has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
PK-35 scores 1.62 goals per game and allows 0.54. KäPa scores 1.17 and allows 1.42. Games in this league average 2.42 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 31% of PK-35's games and 58% of KäPa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 67%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PK-35 has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.34 per game. PK-35 takes 11.8 shots per game, while KäPa takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
PK-35 leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.15 goals per game after halftime. KäPa leads at halftime in 42% and scores 0.42 after halftime.
When the teams score
PK-35's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For KäPa, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.42 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 3 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PK-35 as hosts have a home record this season of 8 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses with 21 goals, sitting 2nd, while KäPa have 4 wins, 3 draws, 5 losses and 14 goals, occupying 8th. In the last 5 matches PK-35 scored 12 goals and recorded 4 wins and 1 draw, equating to 2.6 points per game, whereas KäPa scored 6 goals, had 2 wins and 3 losses and average 1.2 points per game. At PK-35’s stadium they average 1.67 goals, 4.17 shots on target and xG 1.52 while conceding 1.0 goal on average (xG against 1.28); KäPa away average 1.00 goal, 3.0 shots on target and xG 1.25, but concede 1.5 goals (xG against 1.56). Additionally the hosts have a higher conversion rate 13% versus the visitors’ 10% and in the last 5 matches conceded only 2 goals compared to KäPa’s 8 conceded, indicating superiority in chance quality and a more stable defense. Considering the higher xG (1.52 vs 1.25), more shots on target (4.17 vs 3.0) and better points form over the last 5 matches (2.6 vs 1.2), I favor the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators favor both teams scoring: PK-35 has BTTS at 67% and KäPa 50%, yielding an average signal of about 59% that both teams will score. Both teams have xG of 1.43 (PK-35) and 1.25 (KäPa), with xG against at 1.56 for both, indicating they both create and concede scoring opportunities. However, PK-35's last 5 matches show strong offensive and defensive dominance — averaging 2.4 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded (12 scored and 2 conceded in the last 5), which reduces the likelihood KäPa will score. KäPa have conceded 17 goals this season versus 7 conceded by PK-35 and have an average goals scored of 1.0, which on the other hand sustains a realistic chance of goals for both teams. Considering the higher seasonal BTTS (67% vs 50%), xG 1.43 vs 1.25 and the goals conceded distribution (7 vs 17), I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 57% vs 43% as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals around 2.91 (attacking xG for PK-35 is 1.43 vs KäPa 1.25; when adjusted for opponent defenses this yields expected 1.50 goals for PK-35 and 1.41 for KäPa). Both teams have high rates of matches over 2.5 goals: seasonally PK-35 67% and KäPa 67%, with the last 5 matches showing PK-35 at 60% and KäPa at 80%. Additionally PK-35 scored 12 goals in the last 5 matches (2.4 per game) and conceded only 2 (0.4), while KäPa has 6 scored and 8 conceded in the same period, which together increases the likelihood of a higher-scoring affair. The share of matches where both teams scored is 67% for the home side and 50% for the away side, and season-long over 1.5 rates are 83% (PK-35) versus 67% (KäPa), supporting scenarios over 1.5 and 2.5 goals. On this basis the best line to play is Over 2.5, since the expected xG of 2.91 and historical 67% of matches >2.5 provide the strongest signal for the over.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PK-35 is in considerably better form – in the last 5 matches they have a record of 'wdwww' (4 wins, 80%) and score an average of 2.4 goals per game, while KäPa's form is 'lwllw' (2 wins, 40%) with an average of 1.2 goals in that period. However, KäPa have led at the break in 50% of their matches this season (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 50.0) and scored 7 first-half goals in their last 5 matches (last5_GoalsHT_overall_away = 7.0), indicating a strong start to the first half. PK-35 are notably strong after the break: in their last 5 matches the home side scored an average of 2.0 goals in the second half (last5_scored_2hg_avg_overall_home = 2.0) and accumulated 2.6 points from second halves (last5_ppg_2hg_overall_home = 2.6), and their xG of 1.43 versus KäPa’s 1.25 confirms superior chance creation. Based on this, the most likely scenario is HT: KäPa leading (50% signal), but PK-35 stage a turnaround after the break and win the match, hence the HT/FT pick = 2/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PK-35 | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PK-35 is 117% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - PK-35 · 1.2 pts / game - KäPa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 38% better for: goals scored per game.
1.62 goals / game - PK-35 · 1.17 goals / game - KäPa
PK-35 is 163% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.54 goals / game - PK-35 · 1.42 goals / game - KäPa
PK-35 scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while KäPa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).
KäPa scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PK-35
Over / Under - KäPa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KäPa is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / game - PK-35 · 1.67 pts / game - KäPa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 62%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
KäPa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +9 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PK-35
KäPa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| PK-35 | Liga | KäPa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.15 | 2.42 | ▲ 2.58 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 42% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 43% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 33% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 63% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from PK-35's perspective: 1 win, 3 draws and 0 losses against KäPa. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PK-35 vs KäPa?
The Ykkösliiga match finished PK-35 3:1 KäPa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between PK-35 and KäPa?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches PK-35 won 1, KäPa won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before PK-35 vs KäPa?
PK-35 score 1.62 goals per game on average and KäPa 1.17. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 31% of PK-35's matches and 58% of KäPa's.
What form are PK-35 and KäPa in?
Over the last 5 games PK-35 have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and KäPa 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PK-35 vs KäPa?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PK-35 vs KäPa: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


