Nigeria - NPFLVärendsvallenData current as of 23 July 2026

Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: match statistics

Plateau United crest
Plateau United
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Kano Pillars crest
Kano Pillars

Plateau United vs Kano Pillars: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Plateau United play Kano Pillars in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Värendsvallen. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Plateau United: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Kano Pillars: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Plateau United scores 1.03 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Kano Pillars scores 0.97 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Plateau United 39%, Kano Pillars 34%. Over 2.5: Plateau United 39%, Kano Pillars 37%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Plateau United has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.32. Plateau United: 9.2 shots per match, Kano Pillars: 2.7.

Match halves

Plateau United: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.61. Kano Pillars: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

Plateau United: 46-60 (9 goals). Kano Pillars: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Plateau United are the favorites in this match: at home they win 72% of games, score on average 1.56 goals and concede only 0.56 goals per match, with 56% of home fixtures ending in a clean sheet. Kano Pillars have very poor away numbers – they have won just 6% of away matches, lose 78%, score on average 0.5 goals per match and in 56% of away games fail to find the net. The difference in chance creation is clear: Plateau average 13.18 shots and 4.65 on target at home with xG 1.66, while Kano away average 7.67 shots, 2 on target and xG 1.05. Short-term trends, however, favor Kano – the visitors have 3 wins in their last 5 matches, 8 goals scored and 1.8 points per game in that period, whereas Plateau in their last 5 have only 1 win, 5 goals scored and 0.8 points per game. Considering Plateau’s dominant home defense (0.56 goals conceded and 56% clean sheets) and Pillars’ awful away stats (0.5 goals and 6% wins), I tip the hosts to win; suggested probability split is 65% for Plateau, 20% for a draw and 15% for Kano.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
8Shots5
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
5Shots on target3
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.25xG0.76
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1Corners3
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
54Dangerous attacks31
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
-1Fouls-1
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1Cards2
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.03Goals scored / match0.97
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.05Goals conceded / match1.03
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
40%Average possession16%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2.68Shots on target / match0.37
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.16Shots per match2.68
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2.68Shots on target0.37
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
11.2%Shot conversion36.3%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
40%Possession16%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.38xG for1.32
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.29xG against1.45
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Shooting quality

Plateau United: BalancedKano Pillars: Counter-attacking
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
Accuracy (shots on target)29%14%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.49
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.382.62

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kano Pillars is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Plateau United · 1.2 pts / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United
LDLLW
Season result split
39% W13% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-5-18
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
14-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Kano Pillars
LWLWL
Season result split
39% W16% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-6-17
1.34 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-15
Last 5 away
0-1-4
DLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Plateau United is 6% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Plateau United · 0.97 goals / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United scoring profile: strong

Plateau United scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Kano Pillars keeps a clean sheet in 37% (14 of 38 matches).

Kano Pillars scoring profile: strong

Kano Pillars scores in 63% of matches (24 of 38 matches), while Plateau United keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

39Goals scored (season)37
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
40Goals conceded (season)39
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2.08Average goals in match2
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
2Goals scored (last 5)4
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
4Goals conceded (last 5)7
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal63%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
24%2 goals24%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
8%3 goals8%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
5%4 goals3%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal63%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
32%2 goals29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
3%3 goals8%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
3%4 goals3%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time13%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
11%Scored in both halves11%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

BTTS and goal count

34%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
20%BTTS - last 540%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time58%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time68%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kano Pillars is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.21 pts / match - Plateau United · 1.34 pts / match - Kano Pillars

Plateau United - half-time state
18% leading66% draw16% trailing
Kano Pillars - half-time state
29% leading47% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.21Points per match (1st half)1.34
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.37Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.89
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
66%No goal before half-time66%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.11
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
47%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars
58%No goal after half-time61%
Plateau UnitedKano Pillars

Plateau United - second-half results

29% W34% R37% P
46
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding217%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kano Pillars - second-half results

29% W34% R37% P
51
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Plateau United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kano Pillars - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Plateau United
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
5
2
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
9
46-60
5
8
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kano Pillars
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
7
16-30
10
5
31-45
3
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Plateau United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
181%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Kano Pillars

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Plateau UnitedLigaKano Pillars
Average goals in match 2.082.02 2.00
Both teams scored 39%38% 34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%34% 37%
Clean sheets 32%37% 37%
Goal before half-time 50%61% 58%
Goal after half-time 76%64% 68%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Plateau United 0 - 0 - 1 Kano Pillars. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

The NPFL match finished Plateau United 1:0 Kano Pillars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

Plateau United score 1.03 goals per game on average and Kano Pillars 0.97. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Plateau United's matches and 34% of Kano Pillars's.

What form are Plateau United and Kano Pillars in?

Over the last 5 games Plateau United have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Kano Pillars 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plateau United vs Kano Pillars?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.