Plymouth Argyle vs Doncaster Rovers: match statistics
Plymouth Argyle has shown solid form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 9 points, translating to 1.8 points per game. The hosts possess an advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.29 goals per home match with a higher xG (1.48) than Doncaster away (1.23 xG). Doncaster Rovers faces serious issues in away games, losing 59% of matches and failing to score in 47% of games, which constitutes a significant weakness given their -15 goal difference on the road. Additionally, Plymouth has better shot conversion at home (10% vs 8%) and more shots on target on average (4.18 vs 3.59). Considering all statistical parameters, the hosts' advantage is distinct, though their own home goal difference (-4) and 47% loss rate in home matches suggest this will not be an easy victory.
Plymouth Argyle vs Doncaster Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Plymouth Argyle played against Doncaster Rovers in EFL League One (England). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Plymouth Argyle has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Doncaster Rovers has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Plymouth Argyle scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.47. Doncaster Rovers scores 1.09 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.61 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Plymouth Argyle's games and 52% of Doncaster Rovers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 55%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Plymouth Argyle has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.34 per game. Plymouth Argyle takes 12.9 shots per game, while Doncaster Rovers takes 12.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Plymouth Argyle leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. Doncaster Rovers leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Plymouth Argyle's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). For Doncaster Rovers, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.61 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Plymouth Argyle has shown solid form in the last five matches with a record of 3 wins and 9 points, translating to 1.8 points per game. The hosts possess an advantage in offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 1.29 goals per home match with a higher xG (1.48) than Doncaster away (1.23 xG). Doncaster Rovers faces serious issues in away games, losing 59% of matches and failing to score in 47% of games, which constitutes a significant weakness given their -15 goal difference on the road. Additionally, Plymouth has better shot conversion at home (10% vs 8%) and more shots on target on average (4.18 vs 3.59). Considering all statistical parameters, the hosts' advantage is distinct, though their own home goal difference (-4) and 47% loss rate in home matches suggest this will not be an easy victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Plymouth Argyle | Doncaster Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Plymouth Argyle is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.44 goals / game - Plymouth Argyle · 1.09 goals / game - Doncaster Rovers
Plymouth Argyle is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.47 goals / game - Plymouth Argyle · 1.67 goals / game - Doncaster Rovers
Plymouth Argyle scores in 74% of games (25 of 34 meczów), while Doncaster Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 33 meczów).
Doncaster Rovers scores in 70% of games (23 of 33 meczów), while Plymouth Argyle keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Plymouth Argyle
Over / Under - Doncaster Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Plymouth Argyle - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Doncaster Rovers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Plymouth Argyle
Doncaster Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Plymouth Argyle | Liga | Doncaster Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.91 | 2.61 | ▲ 2.76 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 52% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | • 26% | 27% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 69% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | • 82% | 81% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Plymouth Argyle's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Doncaster Rovers. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Plymouth Argyle vs Doncaster Rovers?
The EFL League One match finished Plymouth Argyle 2:1 Doncaster Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Plymouth Argyle vs Doncaster Rovers?
Plymouth Argyle score 1.44 goals per game on average and Doncaster Rovers 1.09. The EFL League One average is 2.61 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Plymouth Argyle's matches and 52% of Doncaster Rovers's.
What form are Plymouth Argyle and Doncaster Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Plymouth Argyle have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Doncaster Rovers 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plymouth Argyle vs Doncaster Rovers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.