Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town: match statistics
Plymouth Argyle has been in solid form over their last five matches, with a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, averaging 2 points per game. The hosts have won 42% of their home fixtures this season, scoring an average of 1.32 goals with an xG of 1.47, indicating untapped offensive potential. Huddersfield Town has a poor away record, losing 58% of their matches on the road and winning only 26%, while conceding an average of 1.58 goals per game. The visitors failed to score in 32% of their away matches, and their low xG (1.32) suggests issues in creating chances. The goal difference of both teams (-2 for the hosts, -8 for the visitors) and Plymouth's higher efficiency at home point to a home win, although the balanced level of both sides could result in a draw.
Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Plymouth Argyle played against Huddersfield Town in EFL League One (England). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Plymouth Argyle has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Huddersfield Town has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Plymouth Argyle scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.39. Huddersfield Town scores 1.53 and allows 1.26. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Plymouth Argyle's games and 55% of Huddersfield Town's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 55%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.44 per game. Plymouth Argyle takes 12.9 shots per game, while Huddersfield Town takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Plymouth Argyle leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.76 goals per game after halftime. Huddersfield Town leads at halftime in 34% and scores 0.87 after halftime.
When the teams score
Plymouth Argyle's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (15 goals). For Huddersfield Town, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Plymouth Argyle has been in solid form over their last five matches, with a record of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss, averaging 2 points per game. The hosts have won 42% of their home fixtures this season, scoring an average of 1.32 goals with an xG of 1.47, indicating untapped offensive potential. Huddersfield Town has a poor away record, losing 58% of their matches on the road and winning only 26%, while conceding an average of 1.58 goals per game. The visitors failed to score in 32% of their away matches, and their low xG (1.32) suggests issues in creating chances. The goal difference of both teams (-2 for the hosts, -8 for the visitors) and Plymouth's higher efficiency at home point to a home win, although the balanced level of both sides could result in a draw.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Plymouth Argyle | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Plymouth Argyle is 25% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Plymouth Argyle · 1.6 pts / game - Huddersfield Town
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Huddersfield Town is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Plymouth Argyle · 1.26 goals / game - Huddersfield Town
Plymouth Argyle scores in 76% of games (29 of 38 meczów), while Huddersfield Town keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 meczów).
Huddersfield Town scores in 82% of games (31 of 38 meczów), while Plymouth Argyle keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Plymouth Argyle
Over / Under - Huddersfield Town
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Huddersfield Town is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.32 pts / game - Plymouth Argyle · 1.39 pts / game - Huddersfield Town
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Plymouth Argyle - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Huddersfield Town - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 34% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Plymouth Argyle
Huddersfield Town
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Plymouth Argyle | Liga | Huddersfield Town | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.89 | 2.62 | ▲ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 26% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 80% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Plymouth Argyle's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Huddersfield Town. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town?
The EFL League One match finished Plymouth Argyle 3:1 Huddersfield Town. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town?
Plymouth Argyle score 1.50 goals per game on average and Huddersfield Town 1.53. The EFL League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Plymouth Argyle's matches and 55% of Huddersfield Town's.
What form are Plymouth Argyle and Huddersfield Town in?
Over the last 5 games Plymouth Argyle have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Huddersfield Town 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town?
The statistical background for Plymouth Argyle vs Huddersfield Town — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.