Podbrezová vs Žilina: match statistics
Podbrezová vs Žilina: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Podbrezová played against Žilina in Super Liga (Slovakia). The game was played on November 30, 2025. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Podbrezová has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Žilina has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Podbrezová scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.71. Žilina scores 2.60 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 3.01 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Podbrezová's games and 67% of Žilina's. The Over 2.5 rates are 64% and 80%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Podbrezová has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.60 per game. Podbrezová takes 15.5 shots per game, while Žilina takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Podbrezová leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Žilina leads at halftime in 73% and scores 1.27 after halftime.
When the teams score
Podbrezová's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Žilina, it is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super Liga games average 3.01 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Podbrezová | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Žilina is 114% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Podbrezová · 3 pts / game - Žilina
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Žilina is 73% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Podbrezová · 2.6 goals / game - Žilina
Žilina is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.71 goals / game - Podbrezová · 1.2 goals / game - Žilina
Podbrezová scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Žilina keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).
Žilina scores in 93% of games (14 of 15 meczów), while Podbrezová keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Podbrezová
Over / Under - Žilina
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Žilina is 76% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - Podbrezová · 2.4 pts / game - Žilina
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Podbrezová - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Žilina - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 73% of games and wins 67%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Podbrezová
Žilina
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Podbrezová | Liga | Žilina | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.21 | 3.01 | ▲ 3.80 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 64% | 57% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 24% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Podbrezová's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Žilina. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Podbrezová vs Žilina?
The Super Liga match finished Podbrezová 2:0 Žilina. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Podbrezová vs Žilina?
Podbrezová score 1.50 goals per game on average and Žilina 2.60. The Super Liga average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Podbrezová's matches and 67% of Žilina's.
What form are Podbrezová and Žilina in?
Over the last 5 games Podbrezová have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Žilina 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Podbrezová vs Žilina?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.