Police Uganda vs UPDF: match statistics
Police Uganda vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Police Uganda played against UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game was played on April 29, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Police Uganda has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. UPDF has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Police Uganda scores 1.48 goals per game and allows 1.24. UPDF scores 0.88 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 2.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Police Uganda's games and 40% of UPDF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 40%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Police Uganda has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.61 per game. Police Uganda takes 11.3 shots per game, while UPDF takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Police Uganda leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. UPDF leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.48 after halftime.
When the teams score
Police Uganda's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For UPDF, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uganda Premier League games average 2.09 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Police Uganda are the favorites: they sit 6th vs UPDF's 12th, have 12 wins this season vs 5 and have scored 37 goals vs 22, giving them a clear season-long advantage. At home Police average 1.58 goals scored and concede only 0.83 per match, have a 67% home win rate and average 4.83 shots on target, while UPDF away average 1.08 goals, concede 1.75, have a 25% win rate and 3.64 shots on target. The efficiency gap is significant: the hosts register 13% shot conversion and 17% of matches without conceding, whereas the visitors have 9% conversion and 42% of matches without scoring, which favors Police despite similar xG (1.72 vs 1.60). It is worth noting, however, that in the last 5 matches UPDF have scored 8 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game versus Police's 6 goals and 1.2 points, indicating better form for the visitors. Taking this into account, I expect the hosts' defensive advantage and finishing to prevail, therefore I tip a Police victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Based on the data, I lean toward BTTS - Yes: season BTTS rates are 38% for Police Uganda and 42% for UPDF, but in the last 5 matches Police has 80% BTTS while UPDF has 40%. Both teams generate similar xG: Police 1.61 and UPDF 1.60, and average 3.15 and 3.64 shots on target respectively, indicating chance creation. Although season goals scored are low (Police 0.69 with 6% conversion, UPDF 1.08 with 9% conversion), UPDF concedes 1.75 goals seasonally and Police concedes 1.8 goals on average in the last 5 matches, so both sides have opportunities to score. On that basis I assign a 62% probability to BTTS - Yes and 38% to No, since higher xG and recent signs of goals conceded indicate an increased likelihood of Goal/Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model gives 1.56 xG for Police Uganda (xG scored 1.61 and xG conceded vs UPDF 1.51) and 1.36 xG for UPDF (xG scored 1.60 and xG conceded vs Police 1.12), totaling 2.92 expected goals. With a combined λ=2.92 the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is ~79%, and at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) ~56%, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Both teams attempt a similar number of shots (11.77 and 11.73) with shots on target 3.15 and 3.64, and UPDF has a higher conversion rate 9% vs Police 6%, increasing the guests’ likelihood to score. In the last 5 matches Police have scored 6 and conceded 9 (1.2 scored, 1.8 conceded avg.), while UPDF scored 8 and conceded 4 (1.6 and 0.8), further supporting a minimum two-goal scenario. Additionally seasonal Over 0.5 rates are high (Police 77%, UPDF 92%), so I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the most probable and strongest option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a Half-Time draw and an away win (X/2). Hosts were level at the break in 69% of matches and score only 0.15 goals on average by half-time versus 0.67 for the visitors, yielding a combined average of 0.82 goals to the 45th minute — a strong signal for a draw in the first half. After the break the visitors are the favorites: the visitors’ season average goals scored is 1.08 versus 0.69 for the hosts, they have a higher win rate (25% vs 15%) and better shot conversion (9% vs 6%), with similar xG (1.61 hosts vs 1.60 visitors), so they more frequently turn chances into goals in the second half. Additionally, the visitors have scored 21 goals before half-time this season versus 7 for the hosts, demonstrating their ability to produce breakthroughs; at the same time the hosts’ high proportion of clean sheets at half-time (69%) and the league’s high clean sheet rate (77%) keep a realistic probability of a full-time draw, which is why X/X remains the second most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Police Uganda | UPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 28% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
UPDF is 33% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Police Uganda · 1.6 pts / game - UPDF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Police Uganda is 68% better for: goals scored per game.
1.48 goals / game - Police Uganda · 0.88 goals / game - UPDF
Police Uganda is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.24 goals / game - Police Uganda · 1.32 goals / game - UPDF
Police Uganda scores in 88% of games (22 of 25 meczów), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
UPDF scores in 52% of games (13 of 25 meczów), while Police Uganda keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Police Uganda
Over / Under - UPDF
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Police Uganda is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Police Uganda · 0.88 pts / game - UPDF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Police Uganda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
UPDF - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Police Uganda
UPDF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Police Uganda | Liga | UPDF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.72 | 2.09 | ▲ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 39% | • 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 36% | ▲ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 38% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 59% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 60% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Police Uganda's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against UPDF. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Police Uganda vs UPDF?
The Uganda Premier League match finished Police Uganda 2:0 UPDF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Police Uganda vs UPDF?
Police Uganda score 1.48 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.88. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Police Uganda's matches and 40% of UPDF's.
What form are Police Uganda and UPDF in?
Over the last 5 games Police Uganda have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and UPDF 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Police Uganda vs UPDF?
The statistical background for Police Uganda vs UPDF — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


