Rwanda - National Soccer LeagueData current as of 19 July 2026

Police vs APR: match statistics

Police crest
Police
1 : 1half-time 0:0
APR crest
APR
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest with an edge for a draw outcome. Police displays solid home form with a 60% win rate at their stadium and conceding just 0.6 goals per match on average, making them a tough opponent on their own ground. APR holds a higher position in the table (2nd place) and has a better overall record (10 wins), but their away form is significantly weaker – only 36% wins and as many as 45% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average (Police: 1 pt/match, APR: 1.2 pt/match in the last 5 games), which further supports the draw scenario. Similar xG values (Police 1.17 vs APR 1.12) and possession stats (Police 54% vs APR 55%) confirm the balanced quality of both sides. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' tendency to draw away, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Police vs APR: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Police play APR in National Soccer League (Rwanda). The match date is 20 February 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Police: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. APR: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Police scores 0.82 and concedes 0.56 goals per match. APR scores 1.47 and concedes 0.82. League average: 2.12 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Police 35%, APR 50%. Over 2.5: Police 18%, APR 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

APR has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.13. Police: 6.1 shots per match, APR: 8.3.

Match halves

Police: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.47. APR: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Police: 76-90+ (8 goals). APR: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National Soccer League: 2.12 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a balanced contest with an edge for a draw outcome. Police displays solid home form with a 60% win rate at their stadium and conceding just 0.6 goals per match on average, making them a tough opponent on their own ground. APR holds a higher position in the table (2nd place) and has a better overall record (10 wins), but their away form is significantly weaker – only 36% wins and as many as 45% draws on the road. The recent form of both teams is average (Police: 1 pt/match, APR: 1.2 pt/match in the last 5 games), which further supports the draw scenario. Similar xG values (Police 1.17 vs APR 1.12) and possession stats (Police 54% vs APR 55%) confirm the balanced quality of both sides. Considering the hosts' defensive solidity and the visitors' tendency to draw away, the most likely result is a share of the points.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
PoliceAPR
17Shots13
PoliceAPR
8Shots on target6
PoliceAPR
2.34xG1.88
PoliceAPR
4Corners3
PoliceAPR
96Dangerous attacks87
PoliceAPR
19Fouls11
PoliceAPR
0Cards0
PoliceAPR

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.82Goals scored / match1.47
PoliceAPR
0.56Goals conceded / match0.82
PoliceAPR
49%Average possession53%
PoliceAPR
2.24Shots on target / match3.06
PoliceAPR

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.06Shots per match8.32
PoliceAPR
2.24Shots on target3.06
PoliceAPR
13.6%Shot conversion17.7%
PoliceAPR
49%Possession53%
PoliceAPR
1.13xG for1.28
PoliceAPR
0.93xG against1.02
PoliceAPR

Shooting quality

Police: Efficient finishingAPR: Efficient finishing
PoliceAPR
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.190.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.48

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

APR is 71% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Police · 2.4 pts / match - APR

Police
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W44% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-15-7
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
APR
LWWWW
Season result split
56% W32% R12% P
Season (W-D-L)
19-11-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

APR is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

0.82 goals / match - Police · 1.47 goals / match - APR

Police is 46% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.56 goals / match - Police · 0.82 goals / match - APR

Police scoring profile: mixed

Police scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while APR keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).

APR scoring profile: strong

APR scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Police keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

28Goals scored (season)50
PoliceAPR
19Goals conceded (season)28
PoliceAPR
1.38Average goals in match2.29
PoliceAPR
2Goals scored (last 5)9
PoliceAPR
1Goals conceded (last 5)6
PoliceAPR

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal82%
PoliceAPR
18%2 goals53%
PoliceAPR
3%3 goals12%
PoliceAPR
3%4 goals0%
PoliceAPR

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal56%
PoliceAPR
3%2 goals18%
PoliceAPR
0%3 goals6%
PoliceAPR
0%4 goals3%
PoliceAPR

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time12%
PoliceAPR
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PoliceAPR
18%Scored in both halves24%
PoliceAPR

BTTS and goal count

15%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
PoliceAPR
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
PoliceAPR
20%BTTS - last 540%
PoliceAPR

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

47%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
PoliceAPR
6%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
PoliceAPR
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PoliceAPR

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
PoliceAPR
18%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
PoliceAPR
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
PoliceAPR

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

APR is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - Police · 1.59 pts / match - APR

Police - half-time state
29% leading56% draw15% trailing
APR - half-time state
41% leading35% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.59
PoliceAPR
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.68
PoliceAPR
0.18Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PoliceAPR
0.53Average goals (1st half)1.18
PoliceAPR
82%Clean sheet before half-time65%
PoliceAPR
68%No goal before half-time50%
PoliceAPR

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per match (2nd half)1.71
PoliceAPR
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
PoliceAPR
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
PoliceAPR
0.85Average goals (2nd half)1.12
PoliceAPR
65%Clean sheet after half-time71%
PoliceAPR
56%No goal after half-time44%
PoliceAPR

Police - second-half results

29% W47% R24% P
49
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

APR - second-half results

44% W38% R18% P
54
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding137%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Police - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.20.4
1 goal20%40%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
APR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.41.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Police
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

APR
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
7
5
16-30
12
7
31-45
7
4
46-60
9
1
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Police

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

APR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
147%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National Soccer League).

Teams vs league

PoliceLigaAPR
Average goals in match 1.382.12 2.29
Both teams scored 35%46% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 18%38% 50%
Clean sheets 47%34% 44%
Goal before half-time 47%61% 74%
Goal after half-time 65%70% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Police 0 - 1 - 0 APR. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Police vs APR?

The National Soccer League match finished Police 1:1 APR. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Police vs APR?

Police score 0.82 goals per game on average and APR 1.47. The National Soccer League average is 2.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Police's matches and 50% of APR's.

What form are Police and APR in?

Over the last 5 games Police have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and APR 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Police vs APR?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.