Polonia Lidzbark Warm. vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. played against Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Warta Sieradz has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. scores 1.71 goals per game and allows 2.43. Warta Sieradz scores 1.86 and allows 1.71. Games in this league average 3.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of Polonia Lidzbark Warm.'s games and 71% of Warta Sieradz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 86% and 86%, compared with league averages of 68% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Warta Sieradz has the higher season xG average, 1.72 to 1.61 per game. Polonia Lidzbark Warm. takes 7.3 shots per game, while Warta Sieradz takes 14.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Warta Sieradz leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.14 after halftime.
When the teams score
Polonia Lidzbark Warm.'s most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Warta Sieradz, it is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.63 goals. Both teams score in 68% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Warta Sieradz have a clearly superior away record: they win 67% of their matches, score an average of 2 goals and concede just 1 per game, while Polonia are still without a home win. The hosts allow opponents chances worth an average of 2.41 xG, while creating only 1.15 xG themselves, pointing to a clear problem with the quality of their play at both ends of the pitch. Warta average 5 shots on target away from home compared to Polonia’s 1, and their shot conversion rate stands at 19% versus 8% for the hosts. Recent form over the last five matches also slightly favors the visitors, who have scored 11 goals and collected an average of 1.4 points per game, while Polonia have conceded 11 goals during this period. However, Polonia are capable of scoring an average of 1.5 goals at home and have not failed to score in any match, making a Warta win with goals for both sides the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The data clearly supports goals at both ends: BTTS occurred in 75% of Polonia’s matches and 67% of Warta’s fixtures, against a league average of 67%. Over their last five appearances, this rate rose to 100% for the hosts and 80% for the visitors, with the teams averaging 1.8 and 2.2 goals scored respectively. Polonia have kept no clean sheets this season and concede an average of 2.25 goals per match, significantly increasing Warta’s chances of scoring. At the same time, Warta have failed to score in none of their league matches, while Polonia produce a high 2.02 xG at home and average 18 shots. Despite the visitors’ stronger defensive record, with a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, their last five games yielded an average of 2.0 goals conceded, making a BTTS - Yes outcome more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Polonia averages 1.75 goals scored at home but concedes as many as 2.25, giving its matches a clear open-game profile. Warta scores an average of 2.00 goals per match, while in its last five appearances it scored 11 goals and conceded 10, resulting in an average of 4.2 total goals per game. The 1.5-goal line was surpassed in 100% of Polonia’s matches and 67% of Warta’s, while Polonia has failed to keep a clean sheet on every occasion. Additionally, both teams have shown strong scoring efficiency in their last five matches: Polonia recorded at least three goals in 80% of its games, compared with 100% for Warta. The strongest selection is Over 1.5 goals, as Warta’s attack scores consistently and the hosts’ weak defense significantly reduces the risk of a very low-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal points to Warta Sieradz leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until full time: the visitors were ahead after 45 minutes in 67% of their matches this season and in 60% of their last five. Over the same recent period, Polonia were trailing at half-time in 75% of their games, scoring an average of just 0.5 goals before the break and conceding 1.75. Warta have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 100% of their matches this season, while the hosts failed to score before the break in 50% of their games. The visitors are also clearly more clinical in front of goal, converting 19% of their shots compared with Polonia’s 10%, and they have won 67% of their matches this season, versus 25% for the hosts. Polonia have strong average xG figures of 2.02 and register 18 shots per match, so a draw at half-time followed by a Warta victory remains a relevant alternative; however, the visitors’ first-half advantage primarily supports the 2/2 HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Polonia Lidzbark Warm. | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.70 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Warta Sieradz is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Polonia Lidzbark Warm. · 1.4 pts / game - Warta Sieradz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 9% better for: goals scored per game.
1.71 goals / game - Polonia Lidzbark Warm. · 1.86 goals / game - Warta Sieradz
Warta Sieradz is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.43 goals / game - Polonia Lidzbark Warm. · 1.71 goals / game - Warta Sieradz
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. scores in 100% of games (7 of 7 games), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 games).
Warta Sieradz scores in 86% of games (6 of 7 games), while Polonia Lidzbark Warm. keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Polonia Lidzbark Warm.
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Warta Sieradz is 298% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.43 pts / game - Polonia Lidzbark Warm. · 1.71 pts / game - Warta Sieradz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Polonia Lidzbark Warm.
Warta Sieradz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Polonia Lidzbark Warm. | Liga | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.14 | 3.63 | • 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 68% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 65% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 18% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Polonia Lidzbark Warm.GoalDominik Kozera
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Polonia Lidzbark Warm. vs Warta Sieradz?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Polonia Lidzbark Warm. 1:2 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Polonia Lidzbark Warm. vs Warta Sieradz?
Polonia Lidzbark Warm. score 1.71 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.86. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Polonia Lidzbark Warm.'s matches and 71% of Warta Sieradz's.
What form are Polonia Lidzbark Warm. and Warta Sieradz in?
Over the last 5 games Polonia Lidzbark Warm. have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Polonia Lidzbark Warm. vs Warta Sieradz?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


