Pontedera vs Ravenna: match statistics
Pontedera vs Ravenna: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pontedera played against Ravenna in Serie C Group B (Italy). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Pontedera has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Ravenna has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Pontedera scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.73. Ravenna scores 1.41 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Pontedera's games and 44% of Ravenna's. The Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 41%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ravenna has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.32 per game. Pontedera takes 10.9 shots per game, while Ravenna takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Pontedera leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Ravenna leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pontedera's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Ravenna, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group B games average 2.25 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ravenna holds a clear advantage and I back the away win: Ravenna is 3rd with 20 wins, while Pontedera sits 19th with just 3 wins. The visitors have scored 48 goals this season versus Pontedera’s 26; in the last 5 matches Ravenna have 7 goals to Pontedera’s 3. On average Ravenna score 1.29 and concede 1.12 away, whereas Pontedera at home score 0.81 and concede 1.63. Although Pontedera has higher home xG (1.46 vs guests’ 1.21) and a similar average of shots on target (3.25 vs 3.18), their conversion rate is low — 7% versus Ravenna’s 14% — so created chances convert to goals less often. Form also favors Ravenna: over the last 5 they are 3-1-1 with 2.0 points per game, while Pontedera are without a win in five (0-2-3) averaging only 0.4 points per game. Additionally, Ravenna failed to score in just 24% of away matches versus Pontedera failing to score in 44% of home games, and Ravenna keep clean sheets more often (24% vs 13%), all of which increases the likelihood of an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess BTTS at 37% (Yes) and 63% (No), selecting 'No' as the more likely outcome. Primary argument is Pontedera's defense — seasonal goals conceded 0.65 and 59% clean sheets, with the home side's seasonal BTTS only 35%, indicating frequent matches without the opponent scoring. Ravenna's seasonal BTTS is 53%, but in the last 5 matches their BTTS dropped to 20%; in that period the away side averaged 1.4 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, so their form does not guarantee both teams scoring. Pontedera creates more chances (xG 1.57 and 4.24 shots on target) than Ravenna (xG 1.21 and 3.18 shots on target), and comparing the visitors' xG 1.21 versus the home defense 1.32 suggests Ravenna may struggle to break down the defense. Considering the low seasonal home BTTS (35%), Ravenna's BTTS drop in the last 5 (20%) and Pontedera's defensive edge, the 'No' scenario appears stronger.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combined expected xG for both teams is approximately 2.79 (1.52 for Pontedera vs 1.27 for Ravenna), exceeding the league average of 2.26 by 0.53 goals. A Poisson model with μ=2.79 indicates probabilities of over 1.5 goals at ~77%, over 2.5 at ~53% and over 3.5 at ~31%. Seasonal indicators support a goal-prone profile: Pontedera has 59% of home matches with >1.5, Ravenna 76% on the road, and both teams have 41% of matches with >2.5. Ravenna have scored 48 goals this season and show BTTS in 53% of matches, while Pontedera have 26 goals and 59% clean sheets at home; however Pontedera have netted only 3 goals in their last 5 matches (0.6 per game) and have conceded on average 1.4 goals. Considering the higher combined xG, seasonal Over/BTTS rates and Poisson probabilities, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (line 1.5) at an estimated ~77%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal numbers favor Pontedera: the hosts win 76% of home matches and average 2.47 points per game, scoring 1.53 goals per match (xG 1.57) while conceding only 0.65. Ravenna have weaker away figures (1.47 points per game, averaging 1.29 scored and 1.12 conceded), yet in the last five matches the visitors led at the break in 60% of cases and average 0.6 goals before halftime in those fixtures. Pontedera, however, haven’t scored by half-time in their last five matches (last5_scoredAVGHT_overall_home = 0.0), while they are more effective after the break (they score 0.82 goals in the second half), whereas Ravenna concede on average 0.82 goals after the break. Comparing this to the xG advantage (1.57 vs 1.21) and a higher volume of shots (12.82 vs 9.53) and shots on target (4.24 vs 3.18), the clearest signal is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1), which therefore has the highest probability for this scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pontedera | Ravenna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ravenna is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Pontedera · 2 pts / game - Ravenna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ravenna is 78% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - Pontedera · 1.41 goals / game - Ravenna
Ravenna is 97% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.73 goals / game - Pontedera · 0.88 goals / game - Ravenna
Pontedera scores in 58% of games (19 of 33 meczów), while Ravenna keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 meczów).
Ravenna scores in 79% of games (27 of 34 meczów), while Pontedera keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pontedera
Over / Under - Ravenna
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ravenna is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / game - Pontedera · 1.65 pts / game - Ravenna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pontedera - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 9%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ravenna - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pontedera
Ravenna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).
Teams vs league
| Pontedera | Liga | Ravenna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.52 | 2.25 | • 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 39% | ▲ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 30% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 63% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 72% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Pontedera's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Ravenna. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pontedera vs Ravenna?
The Serie C Group B match finished Pontedera 0:1 Ravenna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pontedera vs Ravenna?
Pontedera score 0.79 goals per game on average and Ravenna 1.41. The Serie C Group B average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Pontedera's matches and 44% of Ravenna's.
What form are Pontedera and Ravenna in?
Over the last 5 games Pontedera have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Ravenna 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pontedera vs Ravenna?
The statistical background for Pontedera vs Ravenna — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


