Thailand - Thai League T1Data current as of September 13, 2026

Port FC vs Buriram United: match statistics

Port FC crest
Port FC
3 : 1half-time 3:0
Buriram United crest
Buriram United

Port FC vs Buriram United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Port FC played against Buriram United in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Port FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Buriram United has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Port FC scores 1.86 goals per game and allows 0.75. Buriram United scores 2.64 and allows 0.96. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 36% of Port FC's games and 57% of Buriram United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 71%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Buriram United has the higher season xG average, 1.95 to 1.66 per game. Port FC takes 14.7 shots per game, while Buriram United takes 16.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Port FC leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Buriram United leads at halftime in 46% and scores 1.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Port FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Buriram United, it is minutes 76-90+ (20 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Thai League T1 games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Port FC averages 2.50 goals scored and concedes only 0.36 goals per home match, with 64% clean sheets and xG for 1.93 versus xG against 1.09, indicating exceptional defensive efficiency and effective chance creation. Buriram United has a better season tally (74 goals scored vs Port’s 52) and higher away possession (60%), but concedes 1.21 goals on average away and has xG for 1.55. In the last 5 matches Port scored 10 goals, won 4 and averages 2.6 points per game, while Buriram scored 7, won 2 and averages only 1.2 points per game, which favors the hosts in form. Port creates more chances at home (7.07 shots on target and 16.93 shots per match) despite a slightly lower conversion rate (15% vs 18% for the visitors), and also has 0% home defeats this season, so I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project BTTS as more likely: seasonal indicators show BTTS 50% for Port and 64% for Buriram, versus a league average of 55%. Port at home scores an average of 3.0 goals per game (xG 2.35) and registers 8.36 shots on target from 20.0 total shots, while Buriram concede on the road an average of 1.21 goals (xG against 1.07) — this suggests Port has a realistic chance to score. Conversely Buriram average 2.29 goals per game this season and over the last 5 matches generate xG 2.0 and have scored 7 goals (1.4 per game), while Port conceded 4 goals in their last 5 (0.8 per game), indicating the visitors can also find the net. Negative signals include lower BTTS in the last 5 matches at 40% for both teams and the fact Port kept a clean sheet in 43% of home games (i.e. conceded in 57%), whereas Buriram have only 29% clean sheets away (i.e. concede in 71% of away matches). Considering the visitors’ higher seasonal propensity for both teams to score (64% vs 50%) and Port’s offensive edge (3.0 goals and xG 2.35), I assign BTTS 'Yes' 68% vs 'No' 32%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The combined xG for both teams is 3.90 (Port 2.35 vs Buriram 1.55), clearly above the 2.5 threshold and close to 3.5, so I expect a high number of goal-scoring opportunities. Port averages 3.0 goals per match this season with 2.35 xG and records 8.36 shots on target, while Buriram averages 2.29 goals with 1.55 xG and 5.07 shots on target — the offensive advantage translates into scoring chances. Season-long over 2.5 rates are 64% for Port and 79% for Buriram (average ~71%), compared to the league at 46%, which strengthens the over 2.5 signal; over 1.5 is virtually guaranteed (93%/86%). In the last 5 matches Port scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) and conceded 4, while Buriram scored 7 goals (1.4 avg) and conceded 8, which further supports a higher-goal outcome. Based on this, the best line to play appears to be Over 2.5 (strong signal, estimated probability 80%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Port FC led at half-time in 7 matches (50%) and in the last 5 matches were leading in 2 of 5 (40%), while Buriram led at half-time in only 1 of 5 matches (20%). The hosts have a clear attacking quality advantage: average xG 2.35 versus the visitors’ 1.55, on average 20.0 shots and 8.36 shots on target compared to opponents’ 12.57 and 5.07, and they score 1.21 goals by half-time versus Buriram’s 1.07. In the second half Port scores an average of 1.79 goals and concedes only 0.21, with a 79% rate of keeping a second-half clean sheet, which suggests that when leading at the break they often maintain the result. Additionally, Port win 86% of matches season-to-date and have won 80% of their last 5, while Buriram have a 40% win rate in their last 5, so the most probable HT/FT scenario is 1/1 — the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (estimated ~47%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
Port FCBuriram United
13Shots19
Port FCBuriram United
8Shots on target9
Port FCBuriram United
1.6xG2.14
Port FCBuriram United
2Corners8
Port FCBuriram United
31Dangerous attacks43
Port FCBuriram United
12Fouls12
Port FCBuriram United
1Cards2
Port FCBuriram United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Port FCBuriram United
1.86Goals scored / game2.64
Port FCBuriram United
0.75Goals allowed / game0.96
Port FCBuriram United
52%Average possession63%
Port FCBuriram United
5.43Shots on target / game6.71
Port FCBuriram United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.68Shots per game16.29
Port FCBuriram United
5.43Shots on target6.71
Port FCBuriram United
12.7%Shot conversion16.2%
Port FCBuriram United
52%Possession63%
Port FCBuriram United
1.66xG for1.95
Port FCBuriram United
1.19xG against0.94
Port FCBuriram United

Shooting quality

Port FC: AttackingBuriram United: Dominant
Port FCBuriram United
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Port FC is 10% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - Port FC · 2 pts / game - Buriram United

Port FC
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
57% W21% D21% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-6-6
1.93 pts / game · goal difference +31
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-4-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Buriram United
WDWWL
Season result split
79% W11% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
22-3-3
2.46 pts / game · goal difference +47
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
10-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 0.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Buriram United is 42% better for: goals scored per game.

1.86 goals / game - Port FC · 2.64 goals / game - Buriram United

Port FC is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - Port FC · 0.96 goals / game - Buriram United

Port FC scoring profile: strong

Port FC scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 meczów), while Buriram United keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 meczów).

Buriram United scoring profile: strong

Buriram United scores in 93% of games (26 of 28 meczów), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (14 of 28 meczów).

52Goals scored (season)74
Port FCBuriram United
21Goals conceded (season)27
Port FCBuriram United
2.61Average goals per game3.61
Port FCBuriram United
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Port FCBuriram United
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
Port FCBuriram United

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal93%
Port FCBuriram United
54%2 goals79%
Port FCBuriram United
29%3 goals39%
Port FCBuriram United
11%4 goals21%
Port FCBuriram United

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal64%
Port FCBuriram United
11%2 goals21%
Port FCBuriram United
7%3 goals7%
Port FCBuriram United
4%4 goals4%
Port FCBuriram United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time32%
Port FCBuriram United
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Port FCBuriram United
29%Scored in both halves50%
Port FCBuriram United

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
Port FCBuriram United
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Port FCBuriram United
40%BTTS - last 560%
Port FCBuriram United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Port FCBuriram United
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Port FCBuriram United
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Port FCBuriram United

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Port FCBuriram United
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Port FCBuriram United
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Port FCBuriram United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Port FC is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.86 pts / game - Port FC · 1.71 pts / game - Buriram United

Port FC - half-time state
50% leading36% draw14% trailing
Buriram United - half-time state
46% leading32% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.86Points per game (1st half)1.71
Port FCBuriram United
1Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Port FCBuriram United
0.29Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Port FCBuriram United
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.71
Port FCBuriram United
82%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Port FCBuriram United
46%No goal before half-time36%
Port FCBuriram United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.57Points per game (2nd half)2.18
Port FCBuriram United
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.5
Port FCBuriram United
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Port FCBuriram United
1.32Average goals (2nd half)1.89
Port FCBuriram United
57%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Port FCBuriram United
50%No goal after half-time21%
Port FCBuriram United

Port FC - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
52
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Buriram United - second-half results

64% W25% D11% L
48
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+16
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+31
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 79%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Port FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Buriram United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.60
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Port FC
ScoredConceded
12
0
0-15
9
3
16-30
7
5
31-45
6
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
14
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Buriram United
ScoredConceded
9
1
0-15
6
7
16-30
17
8
31-45
14
5
46-60
8
1
61-75
20
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.11
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-68%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Port FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Buriram United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.69
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
238%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).

Teams vs league

Port FCLigaBuriram United
Average goals per game 2.612.67 3.61
Both teams scored 36%56% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%46% 71%
Clean sheets 50%26% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%68% 82%
Goal after half-time 79%82% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Buriram UnitedYellow cardSandy Walsh
  2. Port FCYellow cardShimura Noboru
  3. Buriram UnitedSubstitutionOn: Peter ZuljOff: Robert Zulj
  4. Buriram UnitedYellow cardShinnaphat Lee-Oh
  5. Buriram UnitedSubstitutionOn: Sasalak HaiprakonOff: Pansa Hemviboon
  6. Buriram UnitedSubstitutionOn: Supachai JaidedOff: Thanakrit Chotmuangpak
  7. Port FCSubstitutionOn: Bordin PhalaOff: Leonardo Kalil Abdala
  8. Buriram UnitedGoalPeter Zulj

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Torpong SomsinghaMatches officiated: 10
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 260%Home wins10%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Port FC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Buriram United. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Port FC vs Buriram United?

The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 3:1 Buriram United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Buriram United?

Port FC score 1.86 goals per game on average and Buriram United 2.64. The Thai League T1 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Port FC's matches and 57% of Buriram United's.

What form are Port FC and Buriram United in?

Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Buriram United 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Buriram United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.