Thailand - Thai League T1Data current as of September 08, 2026

Port FC vs Nakhon Ratchasima: match statistics

Port FC crest
Port FC
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Nakhon Ratchasima crest
Nakhon Ratchasima
175%(1.19)
X17%(6.35)
28%(11.00)

Port FC displays dominant home form with a 70% win rate and an impressive +22 goal difference in home matches. The hosts score an average of 2.7 goals per match at home while conceding just 0.5, confirming their defensive solidity (50% clean sheets). Nakhon Ratchasima has catastrophic away records - only a 10% win rate, 70% losses, and a -15 goal difference, scoring on average just 0.7 goals while conceding 2.2 per match. The difference in xG quality is clear: Port generates 1.89 xG in home matches compared to just 1.1 xG for Nakhon Ratchasima in away matches. Considering all statistics, especially the league positions (3rd place vs 16th place) and the form of both teams, Port FC is the clear favorite in this fixture.

Port FC vs Nakhon Ratchasima: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Port FC played against Nakhon Ratchasima in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The game was played on February 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Port FC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Nakhon Ratchasima has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Port FC scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.95. Nakhon Ratchasima scores 0.61 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's games and 33% of Nakhon Ratchasima's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 39%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Port FC has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.19 per game. Port FC takes 14.2 shots per game, while Nakhon Ratchasima takes 9.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Port FC leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Nakhon Ratchasima leads at halftime in 11% and scores 0.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

Port FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Nakhon Ratchasima, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Thai League T1 games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Port FC displays dominant home form with a 70% win rate and an impressive +22 goal difference in home matches. The hosts score an average of 2.7 goals per match at home while conceding just 0.5, confirming their defensive solidity (50% clean sheets). Nakhon Ratchasima has catastrophic away records - only a 10% win rate, 70% losses, and a -15 goal difference, scoring on average just 0.7 goals while conceding 2.2 per match. The difference in xG quality is clear: Port generates 1.89 xG in home matches compared to just 1.1 xG for Nakhon Ratchasima in away matches. Considering all statistics, especially the league positions (3rd place vs 16th place) and the form of both teams, Port FC is the clear favorite in this fixture.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
24Shots9
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
11Shots on target2
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
2.9xG1.11
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
10Corners3
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
88Dangerous attacks55
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15Fouls13
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1Cards2
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
2Goals scored / game0.61
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
0.95Goals allowed / game1.67
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
52%Average possession39%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
5.5Shots on target / game2.56
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.15Shots per game9.39
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
5.5Shots on target2.56
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
14.1%Shot conversion6.5%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
52%Possession39%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1.62xG for1.19
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1.26xG against2.1
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Shooting quality

Port FC: AttackingNakhon Ratchasima: Balanced
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
Accuracy (shots on target)39%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Port FC is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Port FC · 0.6 pts / game - Nakhon Ratchasima

Port FC
WLWLW
Season result split
55% W15% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-6
1.80 pts / game · goal difference +21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Nakhon Ratchasima
LLLWL
Season result split
11% W22% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-12
0.56 pts / game · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Port FC is 228% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - Port FC · 0.61 goals / game - Nakhon Ratchasima

Port FC is 76% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.95 goals / game - Port FC · 1.67 goals / game - Nakhon Ratchasima

Port FC scoring profile: very strong

Port FC scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Nakhon Ratchasima keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 meczów).

Nakhon Ratchasima scoring profile: more difficult

Nakhon Ratchasima scores in 39% of games (7 of 18 meczów), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

40Goals scored (season)11
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
19Goals conceded (season)30
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
2.95Average goals per game2.28
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15Goals scored (last 5)4
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal39%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
55%2 goals17%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
30%3 goals6%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15%4 goals0%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal83%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15%2 goals50%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
10%3 goals11%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
5%4 goals6%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

33%
Nakhon Ratchasima - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 18 meczów
58%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time17%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
0%BTTS in both halves6%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
25%Scored in both halves17%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
80%BTTS - last 520%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Port FC is 108% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.85 pts / game - Port FC · 0.89 pts / game - Nakhon Ratchasima

Port FC - half-time state
50% leading35% draw15% trailing
Nakhon Ratchasima - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.85Points per game (1st half)0.89
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1.05Goals scored (1st half)0.28
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1.4Average goals (1st half)0.94
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
80%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
45%No goal before half-time72%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per game (2nd half)0.72
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
1.55Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
45%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima
55%No goal after half-time72%
Port FCNakhon Ratchasima

Port FC - second-half results

40% W20% R40% P
37
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nakhon Ratchasima - second-half results

11% W39% R50% P
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 11%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Port FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.401.20
Goals scored / game2.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game3.21.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal0%60%
Goal difference+6-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 11
Nakhon Ratchasima - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Port FC
ScoredConceded
8
0
0-15
7
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
11
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Nakhon Ratchasima
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
7
31-45
2
7
46-60
1
3
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
29%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Port FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Nakhon Ratchasima

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.91
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).

Teams vs league

Port FCLigaNakhon Ratchasima
Average goals per game 2.952.77 2.28
Both teams scored 40%58% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%47% 39%
Clean sheets 40%24% 17%
Goal before half-time 65%66% 61%
Goal after half-time 85%85% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nakhon RatchasimaYellow cardYuki Kusano
  2. Nakhon RatchasimaYellow cardHirotaka Mita
  3. Port FCYellow cardPeeradon Chamratsamee
  4. Nakhon RatchasimaSubstitutionOn: Ratthasart BangsungnoenOff: Hein Phyo Win
  5. Nakhon RatchasimaSubstitutionOn: Nattawut JaroenbootOff: Jork Eblin Becerra Portocarrero
  6. Port FCSubstitutionOn: Worachit KanitsribampenOff: Sittha Boonlha
  7. Nakhon RatchasimaSubstitutionOn: Watcharin NuangprakaewOff: Bill Mamadou

Head-to-head

Record from Port FC's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Nakhon Ratchasima. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Nakhon Ratchasima FC
0 : 2
Port FC

FAQ

What was the result of Port FC vs Nakhon Ratchasima?

The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 2:0 Nakhon Ratchasima. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Nakhon Ratchasima?

Port FC score 2.00 goals per game on average and Nakhon Ratchasima 0.61. The Thai League T1 average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's matches and 33% of Nakhon Ratchasima's.

What form are Port FC and Nakhon Ratchasima in?

Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nakhon Ratchasima 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Nakhon Ratchasima?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.