Port FC vs Prachuap: match statistics
Port FC vs Prachuap: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Port FC played against Prachuap in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Port FC has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Prachuap has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Port FC scores 1.92 goals per game and allows 0.84. Prachuap scores 1.28 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's games and 56% of Prachuap's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 36%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Port FC has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.45 per game. Port FC takes 14.5 shots per game, while Prachuap takes 13.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Port FC leads at halftime in 52% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Prachuap leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Port FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Prachuap, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Thai League T1 games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Port FC as the home side shows a clear edge: at home they average 2.67 goals scored per match and concede only 0.42, while Prachuap average 1.00 scored and 1.50 conceded on the road. Quality of chances also favors Port — home xG is 1.94 versus 1.35 xG for the visitors, and Port registers 7.08 shots on target per match with a 16% conversion rate compared to Prachuap’s 4.08 shots on target and 8% conversion. Defensive metrics underline Port’s superiority: 58% clean sheets at home and only 8% of matches without scoring, whereas Prachuap have 17% clean sheets away and 33% of matches without a goal. In the last 5 matches Port scored 13 and conceded 2 (3 wins, 2 draws), while Prachuap scored 6 and conceded 3 (3 wins, 2 draws), which demonstrates higher attacking efficiency from the hosts. Considering Port’s 0% home defeats, better xG, greater number of shots on target and twice the conversion rate, I expect a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Prachuap has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and BTTS in the last 5 matches of 60%, indicating the away side frequently feature in Goal/Goal games. Port FC at home has BTTS 46% and simultaneously 46% clean sheets; in the last 5 matches they scored 13 goals (avg 2.6) and conceded only 2 goals (avg 0.4), combining offensive firepower with defensive stability. xG analysis shows Port generates xG 1.54 versus xG against Prachuap 1.51, while Prachuap has xG 1.35 versus xG against Port 1.15, meaning both teams have realistic scoring chances. Additionally the league averages 56% BTTS, and the high away BTTS rate (67% vs league 56%) is a strong counterargument against the home side keeping frequent clean sheets. For this reason I recommend BTTS = 'Yes' with confidence 62% vs 38% for 'No' — the main risk is Port's 46% home clean sheets, but Prachuap's stats and xG advantage tilt the pick toward both teams to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Port FC averages 1.54 goals per home match (xG 1.54), while Prachuap records 1.00 goals away (xG 1.35), yielding a combined xG = 2.89 which suggests about 2.9 goals in the game. Port has 69% of home matches Over 1.5, Prachuap 83% of away matches Over 1.5, and the league average is 2.7 goals, so Over 1.5 looks very likely. The 2.5 line is more balanced: season-long Port has 31% of matches Over 2.5, Prachuap 42%, but in the last 5 matches Port scores on average 2.6 goals (13 goals in 5 matches) and Prachuap 1.2 (6 goals), which together with the combined xG 2.89 raises the probability of Over 2.5 to a moderate level. Over 3.5 is unlikely based on season data (Port 23%, Prachuap 25%); the combined xG is below 3.5 and games with that many goals occur only sporadically. The best pick is to play Over 1.5: the high Over 1.5 percentages (69% vs 83%), combined xG 2.89 and Port’s form in the last 5 matches (avg. 2.6 goals) provide the strongest and most reliable signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Port FC is the favorite to lead at the break: the home side were leading at HT in 38% of matches versus 25% for Prachuap. Port scores an average of 0.62 goals by half-time compared to 0.33 for their opponents, has a higher xG (1.54 vs 1.35) and more shots on target (4.85 vs 4.08), which confirms an offensive advantage already in the first half. In the second half the hosts score on average 0.92 goals, while Prachuap concedes on average 1.08 goals after the break; the visitors have conceded as many as 7 goals in minutes 76–90, so an HT lead is often maintained or extended. With Port winning 46% of matches this season versus 17% for Prachuap and given these differences in xG and shots, the strongest scenario is 1/1 (Port leads at half-time and wins the match).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Port FC | Prachuap | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Port FC is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.92 goals / game - Port FC · 1.28 goals / game - Prachuap
Port FC is 43% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.84 goals / game - Port FC · 1.2 goals / game - Prachuap
Port FC scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 meczów), while Prachuap keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 meczów).
Prachuap scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 meczów), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Port FC
Over / Under - Prachuap
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Port FC is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / game - Port FC · 1.36 pts / game - Prachuap
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Port FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Prachuap - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Port FC
Prachuap
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).
Teams vs league
| Port FC | Liga | Prachuap | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.76 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 56% | • 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 47% | ▼ 36% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 25% | ▲ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 69% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 82% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Port FC's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Prachuap. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Port FC vs Prachuap?
The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 3:0 Prachuap. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Prachuap?
Port FC score 1.92 goals per game on average and Prachuap 1.28. The Thai League T1 average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Port FC's matches and 56% of Prachuap's.
What form are Port FC and Prachuap in?
Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Prachuap 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Prachuap?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


