Thailand - Thai League T1Data current as of September 08, 2026

Port FC vs Ratchaburi: match statistics

Port FC crest
Port FC
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Ratchaburi crest
Ratchaburi
150%(1.63)
X25%(4.00)
225%(4.60)

Port FC presents impressive home form with 67% of matches won at home and a zero percentage of losses at their own stadium. The hosts record a great goal difference in home matches (+21), scoring an average of 2.78 goals while conceding only 0.44 per match. Ratchaburi, despite occupying second place in the table and recording 75% wins away, shows weaker offensive efficiency in away matches (averaging 2 goals per match) and a worse xG ratio (1.45 vs 1.96 Port FC). A key factor is also that Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 56% of home matches, which, combined with a solid offense, gives them the advantage. Considering all statistics, especially Port FC's dominance on their own turf and the similar form of both teams in the last five matches (1.8 points per match each), the hosts are the favorites for this meeting.

Port FC vs Ratchaburi: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Port FC played against Ratchaburi in Thai League T1 (Thailand). The game was played on January 24, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Port FC has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Ratchaburi has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Port FC scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 0.82. Ratchaburi scores 1.59 and allows 0.76. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 29% of Port FC's games and 35% of Ratchaburi's. The Over 2.5 rates are 35% and 35%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Port FC has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.48 per game. Port FC takes 14.7 shots per game, while Ratchaburi takes 12.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Port FC leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Ratchaburi leads at halftime in 41% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Port FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Ratchaburi, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Thai League T1 games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Port FC presents impressive home form with 67% of matches won at home and a zero percentage of losses at their own stadium. The hosts record a great goal difference in home matches (+21), scoring an average of 2.78 goals while conceding only 0.44 per match. Ratchaburi, despite occupying second place in the table and recording 75% wins away, shows weaker offensive efficiency in away matches (averaging 2 goals per match) and a worse xG ratio (1.45 vs 1.96 Port FC). A key factor is also that Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 56% of home matches, which, combined with a solid offense, gives them the advantage. Considering all statistics, especially Port FC's dominance on their own turf and the similar form of both teams in the last five matches (1.8 points per match each), the hosts are the favorites for this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

34Possession (%)66
Port FCRatchaburi
10Shots6
Port FCRatchaburi
6Shots on target1
Port FCRatchaburi
1.29xG0.88
Port FCRatchaburi
3Corners4
Port FCRatchaburi
33Dangerous attacks57
Port FCRatchaburi
21Fouls13
Port FCRatchaburi
2Cards4
Port FCRatchaburi

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Port FCRatchaburi
1.88Goals scored / game1.59
Port FCRatchaburi
0.82Goals allowed / game0.76
Port FCRatchaburi
53%Average possession54%
Port FCRatchaburi
5.53Shots on target / game4.65
Port FCRatchaburi

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.65Shots per game12.41
Port FCRatchaburi
5.53Shots on target4.65
Port FCRatchaburi
12.9%Shot conversion12.8%
Port FCRatchaburi
53%Possession54%
Port FCRatchaburi
1.67xG for1.48
Port FCRatchaburi
1.27xG against1.6
Port FCRatchaburi

Shooting quality

Port FC: AttackingRatchaburi: Balanced
Port FCRatchaburi
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ratchaburi is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Port FC · 2.4 pts / game - Ratchaburi

Port FC
WWLWL
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / game · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Ratchaburi
WWLWW
Season result split
65% W12% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-4
2.06 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-0-2
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Port FC is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.88 goals / game - Port FC · 1.59 goals / game - Ratchaburi

Ratchaburi is 8% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.82 goals / game - Port FC · 0.76 goals / game - Ratchaburi

Port FC scoring profile: mixed

Port FC scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Ratchaburi keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).

Ratchaburi scoring profile: strong

Ratchaburi scores in 76% of games (13 of 17 meczów), while Port FC keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).

32Goals scored (season)27
Port FCRatchaburi
14Goals conceded (season)13
Port FCRatchaburi
2.71Average goals per game2.35
Port FCRatchaburi
11Goals scored (last 5)8
Port FCRatchaburi
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
Port FCRatchaburi

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal76%
Port FCRatchaburi
47%2 goals35%
Port FCRatchaburi
29%3 goals29%
Port FCRatchaburi
12%4 goals12%
Port FCRatchaburi

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal53%
Port FCRatchaburi
12%2 goals24%
Port FCRatchaburi
6%3 goals0%
Port FCRatchaburi
6%4 goals0%
Port FCRatchaburi

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time6%
Port FCRatchaburi
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Port FCRatchaburi
24%Scored in both halves24%
Port FCRatchaburi

BTTS and goal count

18%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Port FCRatchaburi
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Port FCRatchaburi
40%BTTS - last 540%
Port FCRatchaburi

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Port FCRatchaburi
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Port FCRatchaburi
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Port FCRatchaburi

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Port FCRatchaburi
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time35%
Port FCRatchaburi
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Port FCRatchaburi

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Port FC - half-time state
41% leading41% draw18% trailing
Ratchaburi - half-time state
41% leading41% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.65Points per game (1st half)1.65
Port FCRatchaburi
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Port FCRatchaburi
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Port FCRatchaburi
1.24Average goals (1st half)0.94
Port FCRatchaburi
82%Clean sheet before half-time76%
Port FCRatchaburi
53%No goal before half-time53%
Port FCRatchaburi

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per game (2nd half)1.76
Port FCRatchaburi
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Port FCRatchaburi
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Port FCRatchaburi
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Port FCRatchaburi
53%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Port FCRatchaburi
53%No goal after half-time47%
Port FCRatchaburi

Port FC - second-half results

41% W24% R35% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ratchaburi - second-half results

47% W35% R18% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding159%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 65%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Port FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game2.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7
Ratchaburi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.20
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+5-1
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Port FC
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
7
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
3
2
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Ratchaburi
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
5
3
16-30
5
2
31-45
6
0
46-60
5
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Port FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Ratchaburi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.84
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Thai League T1).

Teams vs league

Port FCLigaRatchaburi
Average goals per game 2.712.74 2.35
Both teams scored 29%57% 35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%46% 35%
Clean sheets 47%25% 47%
Goal before half-time 59%63% 65%
Goal after half-time 82%84% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.62
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+45%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defensive advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RatchaburiYellow cardDaniel Sang Ting
  2. Port FCYellow cardMichael Falkesgaard
  3. Port FCYellow cardTeerasak Poeiphimai
  4. RatchaburiYellow cardKritsananon Srisuwan
  5. RatchaburiSubstitutionOn: Kevin DeeromramOff: Gabriel Mutombo Kupa
  6. Port FCSubstitutionOn: Worachit KanitsribampenOff: Siwakorn Tiatrakul
  7. RatchaburiYellow cardJesse Curran
  8. RatchaburiYellow cardSiwakorn Chakkuprasart

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Songkran BunmeekiartMatches officiated: 9
5.78Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins22%Draws44%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Port FC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Ratchaburi. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Ratchaburi Mitr Phol FC
1 : 0
Port FC

FAQ

What was the result of Port FC vs Ratchaburi?

The Thai League T1 match finished Port FC 2:1 Ratchaburi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Port FC vs Ratchaburi?

Port FC score 1.88 goals per game on average and Ratchaburi 1.59. The Thai League T1 average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Port FC's matches and 35% of Ratchaburi's.

What form are Port FC and Ratchaburi in?

Over the last 5 games Port FC have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Ratchaburi 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port FC vs Ratchaburi?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Port FC vs Ratchaburi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.