Port Vale vs Barnsley: match statistics
Port Vale vs Barnsley: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Port Vale played against Barnsley in EFL League One (England). The game was played on April 14, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Port Vale has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Barnsley has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Port Vale scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 1.38. Barnsley scores 1.58 and allows 1.63. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Port Vale's games and 70% of Barnsley's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 65%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Barnsley has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.25 per game. Port Vale takes 11.2 shots per game, while Barnsley takes 11.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Port Vale leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Barnsley leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Port Vale's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). For Barnsley, it is minutes 0-15 (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
League One games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Barnsley are the favorites in this matchup: they have 63 goals this season versus Port Vale’s 30 and a significantly higher finishing rate (approx. 14% vs 7%). The home side average 0.85 goals per home game with xG 1.4, indicating efficiency issues, whereas Barnsley average 1.42 goals away with xG 1.24 and a shutout rate of only 21% (Port Vale 50%). In the last 5 matches Port Vale scored 2 and conceded 12 (2.4 per game), while Barnsley scored 5 and conceded 7 (1.4 per game), which favors the visitors. The hosts concede 1.15 goals at home on average, whereas Barnsley concede 1.74 away, but Barnsley’s low away clean sheet rate (5%) and a high average goals in away matches (3.16) suggest an open, high-scoring game. On this basis I forecast a Barnsley win with probabilities: Barnsley 58%, Home 20%, Draw 22%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have high seasonal BTTS rates: Port Vale 67% and Barnsley 74%, both well above the league average of 52%, which is a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. Both sides consistently create and concede chances — Port Vale scores 1.71 and concedes 1.52 on average, Barnsley scores 1.42 and concedes 1.74, with xG at 1.44 (Port Vale) vs 1.24 (Barnsley) and xG against 1.32 and 1.57; this demonstrates goal potential from both teams. Clean sheets are rare (5% and 5%), and matches over 2.5 goals occur in 62% and 68% of games; the combination of over2.5 and BTTS appears in 52% and 57% of cases, further supporting both teams to score. As a counterpoint, note that in the last 5 matches Port Vale has 0% BTTS, scores 0.4 and concedes 2.4 on average, while Barnsley in the last 5 has 60% BTTS and averages 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded; this reduces confidence but seasonal figures prevail. Therefore I assign BTTS 72% for 'yes' and 28% for 'no', selecting btts_pred_pick "yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a very high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals this season: Port Vale 86% and Barnsley 89%, making the 1.5 line the strongest signal. xG analysis yields expected goals ≈1.51 for Port Vale (attacking xG 1.44 vs opponents’ average xG 1.57) and ≈1.28 for Barnsley (attacking xG 1.24 vs xG conceded to Port Vale 1.32), total ≈2.79. Season-long Over 2.5 rates are 62% (Port Vale) and 68% (Barnsley), but a Poisson model with λ=2.79 gives roughly a 53% chance of at least 3 goals and ~31% for at least 4 goals; therefore Over 2.5 is moderately likely while Over 3.5 is less certain. Additionally, in 67% of Port Vale’s matches and 74% of Barnsley’s matches both teams scored, and only 5% of matches end with a clean sheet for either side, which strengthens the over signal. Given Port Vale’s poor form in the last 5 matches (2 goals scored, 12 conceded), I recommend Over 1.5 as the best and safest play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast a Half-Time draw and a Port Vale comeback to win Full-Time (X/1) as the most likely scenario. Port Vale drew at the break in 48% of matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 48%), while Barnsley did so in only 26% (drawingAtHTPercentage_away = 26%), which strongly favors a HT draw. The second half yields many goals: on average 1.62 goals for home teams and 1.79 for away teams after the break (AVG_2hg_home = 1.62, AVG_2hg_away = 1.79), and Port Vale has a higher xG of 1.44 versus 1.24 (xg_for_avg_home = 1.44 vs xg_for_avg_away = 1.24) as well as a higher average points at home (1.52 vs 1.16), supporting a comeback and victory. Additionally, Port Vale scored 10 goals in minutes 0–15 versus 2 for Barnsley and 7 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 2 for the visitors, indicating the ability to open the scoring and to produce decisive late goals. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to X/1 (28%) with significant support for 1/1 (22%) and X/X (16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Port Vale | Barnsley | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Port Vale is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Port Vale · 1 pts / game - Barnsley
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Barnsley is 105% better for: goals scored per game.
0.77 goals / game - Port Vale · 1.58 goals / game - Barnsley
Port Vale is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.38 goals / game - Port Vale · 1.63 goals / game - Barnsley
Port Vale scores in 49% of games (19 of 39 meczów), while Barnsley keeps a clean sheet in 5% (2 of 40 meczów).
Barnsley scores in 75% of games (30 of 40 meczów), while Port Vale keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 39 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Port Vale
Over / Under - Barnsley
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Barnsley is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.08 pts / game - Port Vale · 1.35 pts / game - Barnsley
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Port Vale - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Barnsley - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Port Vale
Barnsley
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| Port Vale | Liga | Barnsley | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.15 | 2.59 | ▲ 3.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 52% | ▲ 70% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 51% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 27% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 70% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 62% | 80% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Port Vale's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Barnsley. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Port Vale vs Barnsley?
The EFL League One match finished Port Vale 0:0 Barnsley. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Port Vale vs Barnsley?
Port Vale score 0.77 goals per game on average and Barnsley 1.58. The EFL League One average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Port Vale's matches and 70% of Barnsley's.
What form are Port Vale and Barnsley in?
Over the last 5 games Port Vale have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Barnsley 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port Vale vs Barnsley?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


