England - EFL League OneData current as of 18 July 2026

Port Vale vs Reading: match statistics

Port Vale crest
Port Vale
1 : 1half-time 0:1
Reading crest
Reading
125%(2.90)
X30%(3.35)
245%(2.49)

Reading are the clear favorites in this match. Port Vale occupy the last, 24th position in the table with just a 14% home win rate and an alarming 57% of home matches without scoring a goal. The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 games and have a negative goal difference (-6) in home matches. Reading, on the other hand, sit in 8th place, have won 3 of their last 5 matches, and are in significantly better form (2 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 0.8 for Port Vale). The visitors boast twice the scoring efficiency (13% vs 7%) and a much lower rate of away matches without a goal (13% vs 57% for the hosts). Although Reading win only 27% of their away matches, their massive superiority in form and quality over one of the league's weakest teams points to an away victory.

Port Vale vs Reading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Port Vale play Reading in EFL League One (England). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Port Vale: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Reading: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Port Vale scores 0.78 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Reading scores 1.39 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Port Vale 35%, Reading 67%. Over 2.5: Port Vale 39%, Reading 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Port Vale has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.23. Port Vale: 11.1 shots per match, Reading: 11.0.

Match halves

Port Vale: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.37. Reading: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Port Vale: 0-15 (10 goals). Reading: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League One: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Reading are the clear favorites in this match. Port Vale occupy the last, 24th position in the table with just a 14% home win rate and an alarming 57% of home matches without scoring a goal. The hosts have lost 3 of their last 5 games and have a negative goal difference (-6) in home matches. Reading, on the other hand, sit in 8th place, have won 3 of their last 5 matches, and are in significantly better form (2 points per game in the last 5 matches vs 0.8 for Port Vale). The visitors boast twice the scoring efficiency (13% vs 7%) and a much lower rate of away matches without a goal (13% vs 57% for the hosts). Although Reading win only 27% of their away matches, their massive superiority in form and quality over one of the league's weakest teams points to an away victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Port ValeReading
14Shots11
Port ValeReading
6Shots on target2
Port ValeReading
1.67xG1.06
Port ValeReading
9Corners3
Port ValeReading
51Dangerous attacks30
Port ValeReading
10Fouls12
Port ValeReading
0Cards2
Port ValeReading

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.78Goals scored / match1.39
Port ValeReading
1.33Goals conceded / match1.3
Port ValeReading
46%Average possession50%
Port ValeReading
3.11Shots on target / match3.78
Port ValeReading

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.13Shots per match10.96
Port ValeReading
3.11Shots on target3.78
Port ValeReading
7%Shot conversion12.7%
Port ValeReading
46%Possession50%
Port ValeReading
1.24xG for1.23
Port ValeReading
1.38xG against1.42
Port ValeReading

Shooting quality

Port Vale: BalancedReading: Balanced
Port ValeReading
Accuracy (shots on target)28%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Port Vale is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Port Vale · 0.2 pts / match - Reading

Port Vale
DLLWL
Season result split
22% W26% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-24
0.91 pts / match · goal difference -25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-9-10
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Reading
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
35% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-15-15
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-9
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Reading is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

0.78 goals / match - Port Vale · 1.39 goals / match - Reading

Port Vale scoring profile: strong

Port Vale scores in 48% of matches (22 of 46 matches), while Reading keeps a clean sheet in 17% (8 of 46 matches).

Reading scoring profile: very strong

Reading scores in 85% of matches (39 of 46 matches), while Port Vale keeps a clean sheet in 28% (13 of 46 matches).

36Goals scored (season)64
Port ValeReading
61Goals conceded (season)60
Port ValeReading
2.11Average goals in match2.7
Port ValeReading
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Port ValeReading
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Port ValeReading

How often they score at least...

48%1 goal85%
Port ValeReading
22%2 goals39%
Port ValeReading
4%3 goals13%
Port ValeReading
2%4 goals2%
Port ValeReading

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal83%
Port ValeReading
35%2 goals39%
Port ValeReading
17%3 goals9%
Port ValeReading
7%4 goals0%
Port ValeReading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time20%
Port ValeReading
4%BTTS in both halves11%
Port ValeReading
9%Scored in both halves26%
Port ValeReading

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Port ValeReading
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Port ValeReading
40%BTTS - last 560%
Port ValeReading

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

59%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Port ValeReading
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
Port ValeReading
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Port ValeReading

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
Port ValeReading
28%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Port ValeReading
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Port ValeReading

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Reading is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Port Vale · 1.43 pts / match - Reading

Port Vale - half-time state
22% leading48% draw30% trailing
Reading - half-time state
33% leading46% draw22% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.43
Port ValeReading
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Port ValeReading
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
Port ValeReading
1Average goals (1st half)1.04
Port ValeReading
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Port ValeReading
67%No goal before half-time52%
Port ValeReading

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Port ValeReading
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Port ValeReading
0.74Goals conceded (2nd half)0.89
Port ValeReading
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Port ValeReading
48%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Port ValeReading
76%No goal after half-time37%
Port ValeReading

Port Vale - second-half results

13% W43% R43% P
52
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Reading - second-half results

30% W28% R41% P
66
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Port Vale - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Reading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Port Vale
ScoredConceded
10
8
0-15
4
11
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
13
46-60
3
10
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Reading
ScoredConceded
8
9
0-15
8
5
16-30
13
5
31-45
7
12
46-60
12
16
61-75
16
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-58%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Port Vale

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Reading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Port ValeLigaReading
Average goals in match 2.112.62 2.70
Both teams scored 35%52% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 39%51% 48%
Clean sheets 28%27% 17%
Goal before half-time 59%70% 70%
Goal after half-time 63%81% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Port Vale 0 - 0 - 1 Reading. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Reading FC
1 : 0
Port Vale FC

FAQ

What was the result of Port Vale vs Reading?

The EFL League One match finished Port Vale 1:1 Reading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Port Vale vs Reading?

Port Vale score 0.78 goals per game on average and Reading 1.39. The EFL League One average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Port Vale's matches and 67% of Reading's.

What form are Port Vale and Reading in?

Over the last 5 games Port Vale have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Reading 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Port Vale vs Reading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.