Portadown vs Glenavon: match statistics
Portadown vs Glenavon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Portadown played against Glenavon in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The game was played on December 26, 2025. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Portadown has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Glenavon has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Portadown scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.86. Glenavon scores 0.86 and allows 2.14. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Portadown's games and 52% of Glenavon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 57%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Portadown has the higher season xG average, 1.28 to 1.06 per game. Portadown takes 9.3 shots per game, while Glenavon takes 8.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Portadown leads at halftime in 24% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Glenavon leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Portadown's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). For Glenavon, it is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
NIFL Premiership games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Portadown | Glenavon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Portadown is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Portadown · 1.2 pts / game - Glenavon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portadown is 55% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Portadown · 0.86 goals / game - Glenavon
Portadown is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.86 goals / game - Portadown · 2.14 goals / game - Glenavon
Portadown scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while Glenavon keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 21 meczów).
Glenavon scores in 57% of games (12 of 21 meczów), while Portadown keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portadown
Over / Under - Glenavon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Portadown is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Portadown · 0.71 pts / game - Glenavon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portadown - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Glenavon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 19%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Portadown
Glenavon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Portadown | Liga | Glenavon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.19 | 2.76 | ▲ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 26% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 76% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 78% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Portadown's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Glenavon. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Portadown vs Glenavon?
The NIFL Premiership match finished Portadown 1:0 Glenavon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Portadown vs Glenavon?
Portadown score 1.33 goals per game on average and Glenavon 0.86. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Portadown's matches and 52% of Glenavon's.
What form are Portadown and Glenavon in?
Over the last 5 games Portadown have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Glenavon 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portadown vs Glenavon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.