Portland Timbers II vs Austin II: match statistics
Portland Timbers II vs Austin II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Portland Timbers II played against Austin II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on August 30, 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Portland Timbers II has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Austin II has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Portland Timbers II scores 1.38 goals per game and allows 1.08. Austin II scores 2.00 and allows 0.79. Games in this league average 3.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Portland Timbers II's games and 50% of Austin II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 46%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 1.66 per game. Portland Timbers II takes 13.9 shots per game, while Austin II takes 13.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Portland Timbers II leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Austin II leads at halftime in 54% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Portland Timbers II's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For Austin II, it is minutes 31-45+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS Next Pro games average 3.31 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Austin II lead the table and have won 16 of their 24 matches this season, while Portland Timbers II have recorded 13 wins and 4 defeats. The visitors are particularly solid away from home: they have not lost a single away match, winning 64% of their games and conceding just 0.36 goals per match, while keeping a clean sheet in 64% of fixtures. Portland create more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.98 compared with Austin’s 1.68, but this translates into only 1.18 goals per match, and they fail to score in as many as 36% of their home appearances. Austin average 1.82 goals away from home, have a 13% shot conversion rate compared with the hosts’ 7%, and have conceded just 2 goals in their last five matches. Both teams are unbeaten in their last five league rounds, but the visitors’ more consistent defense and clearly superior finishing give them the edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Austin II’s defense, which concedes just 0.36 goals per match on average and keeps a clean sheet in 64% of games, compared with 38% for Portland Timbers II. BTTS has landed in only 36% of Austin II’s matches, well below the league average of 62%, while in the last five appearances of both teams, this figure stood at 40% for each side. Portland is highly effective at home, scoring an average of 2.15 goals, so the most realistic No Goal scenario assumes the hosts will score while Austin II fails to respond. Current defensive form further supports this outcome: Portland has conceded 3 goals in its last 5 matches, while Austin has conceded only 2. Although Austin creates chances worth 1.68 xG per match, the solid defensive runs of both teams reduce the likelihood of a Goal/Goal outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as Austin II conceded just 0.36 goals per away match during the season and kept a clean sheet in 64% of games. The current form of both defenses also limits the potential for an open contest: Portland Timbers II conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches, while Austin II allowed just 2. Despite a season average of 2.15 goals, Portland’s attack scored 1.6 goals per match across its last five appearances, whereas Austin averaged 1.4 goals during that period. The xG figures remain moderate, with the teams’ expected attacking output standing at 1.67 and 1.56 respectively, but the visitors’ solid defense should reduce the hosts’ efficiency. Historically, 54% of Portland’s matches and as many as 82% of Austin’s games finished with fewer than 3.5 goals, supporting a projection of around 2.20 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Austin II win, as Portland were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, while Austin recorded a draw at the break in 60%. Both teams are difficult to surprise before half-time: Portland concede an average of just 0.31 goals by the break, compared with 0.27 for Austin, and the visitors kept a clean sheet at half-time in 73% of their matches. Austin have not lost a match this season, conceding an average of only 0.36 goals per game, and prevented their opponents from scoring in as many as 91% of second halves. Portland are highly dangerous at home, averaging 2.15 goals and winning 69% of their matches, but their recent scoring form has dropped to 1.6 goals per game, increasing the well-organized visitors’ chances of deciding the match after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers II | Austin II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Austin II is 45% better for: goals scored per game.
1.38 goals / game - Portland Timbers II · 2 goals / game - Austin II
Austin II is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.08 goals / game - Portland Timbers II · 0.79 goals / game - Austin II
Portland Timbers II scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 games).
Austin II scores in 96% of games (23 of 24 games), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 54% (13 of 24 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers II
Over / Under - Austin II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Austin II is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - Portland Timbers II · 1.96 pts / game - Austin II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Austin II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 54% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Portland Timbers II
Austin II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers II | Liga | Austin II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.46 | 3.31 | ▼ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 62% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 66% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 54% | 21% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 84% | • 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Portland Timbers II's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Austin II. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 2:1 Austin II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and Austin II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 1, Austin II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?
Portland Timbers II score 1.38 goals per game on average and Austin II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 50% of Austin II's.
What form are Portland Timbers II and Austin II in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Austin II 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs Austin II?
The statistical background for Portland Timbers II vs Austin II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


