United States - MLS Next ProProvidence ParkData current as of September 08, 2026

Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics

Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Portland Timbers II played against San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Providence Park. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

Portland Timbers II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. San Jose Earthquakes II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Portland Timbers II scores 1.27 goals per game and allows 1.27. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 2.15 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 3.24 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Portland Timbers II's games and 69% of San Jose Earthquakes II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 69%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Portland Timbers II has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.56 per game. Portland Timbers II takes 14.9 shots per game, while San Jose Earthquakes II takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Portland Timbers II leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. San Jose Earthquakes II leads at halftime in 62% and scores 0.85 after halftime.

When the teams score

Portland Timbers II's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For San Jose Earthquakes II, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.24 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Portland Timbers II score on average 1.25 goals and concede 1.25 goals per home match, with average xG 2.1 versus xG against 1.4, indicating they create more chances than the opponent. In their last 5 matches Portland have won 3 times and average 1.8 points, and at home they average 18.25 shots (6.88 on target) compared to San Jose’s away averages of 14 shots (4.63 on target). San Jose Earthquakes II, however, are more efficient in finishing (conversion rate 13% vs Portland’s 7%) and average 1.75 goals on the road, but their away defense concedes 1.5 goals with xG against 1.76 and only 13% clean sheets. Considering Portland’s better chance creation and more solid home defense (38% clean sheets and lower xG against 1.4), I expect a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS (both teams to score): the primary signal is San Jose’s very high season BTTS rate — 88% versus Portland’s 40%. In the last 5 matches San Jose scored 8 goals (avg. 1.6) and had BTTS in 60% of games, while Portland scored 5 goals (avg. 1.0) and had BTTS in only 20%, suggesting the visitors are more likely to provide at least one goal. xG shows San Jose generates 1.67 xG per game, and Portland concedes 1.5 xG on average — this statistically favors a guest goal; at the same time the hosts have a seasonal goals scored average of 2.8 with xG 1.39 and a very high shot conversion 25% (versus 13% San Jose), so the home side also has a realistic chance to score. Additionally the league has BTTS 62% and an average of 3.23 goals per match, with over 2.5 rates of 60% for Portland and 75% for San Jose; San Jose combines over 2.5 with BTTS in 75% of their games, which reinforces the both-teams-to-score scenario. Although Portland has 40% clean sheets on the season and a low conceded average 0.6, the hosts’ last 5 matches show an average conceded 1.4, so the balance of signals favors the ‘Yes’ option.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I back Over 1.5 as the strongest signal because Portland score 2.8 goals at home on average and concede only 0.6, while San Jose average 1.75 goals away and see BTTS in 88% of their away matches. The combined xG for both teams is 3.06 (1.39 + 1.67), and the league average goals is 3.23, which supports the scenario of at least two goals in the match. Additionally, Portland has a very high shot conversion rate of 25% versus San Jose’s 13%, so despite the home xG of 1.39 I project them at around 1.62 goals. San Jose’s xG is 1.67, but in the last 5 matches away xG dropped to 1.47 with an average of 1.6 goals scored, hence my expectation of ~1.49 goals for the visitors (total ~3.11), which provides strong backing for Over 1.5 (Over 2.5 also has solid support: 60% for Portland at home and 75% for San Jose away).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Seasonal metrics clearly favor the home side: Portland score an average of 2.8 goals per match versus the visitors' 1.75 and concede 0.6 against opponents, with a win rate of 80% compared to San Jose's 25%, translating to an average of 2.4 points per match versus the visitors' 1.13. At Half-Time, the home team lead in 80% of matches (4 of 5) and average 1.8 goals at the break versus the visitors' 1.0, although in the last five matches the home side led in only 20% (1 of 5) and their average goals at the break over the last five is 0.4 versus the visitors' 1.0, which weakens confidence in the HT. After the break Portland score an average of 1.0 and concede 0.4, while San Jose score 0.75 and concede 1.13, suggesting the home lead is usually maintained or extended. Additionally, the home side have markedly better efficiency (conversion rate 25% vs 13% and 5.0 shots on target vs 4.63), despite similar xG (1.39 vs 1.67), so the efficiency advantage favors a home victory. Therefore the most likely scenario is a home lead at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13Shots11
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4Shots on target4
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.73xG1.37
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
8Corners4
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
86Dangerous attacks56
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
10Fouls12
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
3Cards1
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.27Goals scored / game2.15
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.27Goals allowed / game1.15
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
45%Average possession49%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.6Shots on target / game4.77
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.93Shots per game12.92
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.6Shots on target4.77
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
8.5%Shot conversion16.7%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
45%Possession49%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.74xG for1.56
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.42xG against1.66
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers II: AttackingSan Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishing
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Portland Timbers II is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Portland Timbers II · 1 pts / game - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II
LWWLW
Season result split
53% W27% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-3
1.87 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
San Jose Earthquakes II
DLDWL
Season result split
46% W23% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-4
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LWDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 69% better for: goals scored per game.

1.27 goals / game - Portland Timbers II · 2.15 goals / game - San Jose Earthquakes II

San Jose Earthquakes II is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.27 goals / game - Portland Timbers II · 1.15 goals / game - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers II scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: strong

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 meczów), while Portland Timbers II keeps a clean sheet in 53% (8 of 15 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)28
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
19Goals conceded (season)15
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
2.53Average goals per game3.31
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5Goals scored (last 5)8
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
7Goals conceded (last 5)7
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal85%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
40%2 goals54%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13%3 goals38%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0%4 goals23%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they concede at least...

47%1 goal77%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
33%2 goals31%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
27%3 goals8%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13%4 goals0%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

33%
Portland Timbers II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.5 of 15 meczów
69%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.9 of 13 meczów
62%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time23%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
7%BTTS in both halves8%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13%Scored in both halves38%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS62%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
20%BTTS - last 560%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time31%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

San Jose Earthquakes II is 101% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / game - Portland Timbers II · 2.15 pts / game - San Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
62% leading31% draw8% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per game (1st half)2.15
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.33Goals scored (1st half)1.31
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.62
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
60%Clean sheet before half-time69%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
67%No goal before half-time23%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.87Points per game (2nd half)1.15
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.69
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
60%Clean sheet after half-time46%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II
47%No goal after half-time54%
Portland Timbers IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Portland Timbers II - second-half results

53% W27% R20% P
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding265%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

31% W23% R46% P
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at halftime in 62% of games and wins 46%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Portland Timbers II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.80
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Portland Timbers II
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
5
16-30
0
2
31-45
5
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
8
1
31-45
5
2
46-60
5
3
61-75
1
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.92
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Portland Timbers II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.59
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
149%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
64%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.62
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Portland Timbers IILigaSan Jose Earthquakes II
Average goals per game 2.533.24 3.31
Both teams scored 33%62% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%65% 69%
Clean sheets 53%21% 23%
Goal before half-time 60%75% 85%
Goal after half-time 73%84% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / game
1.44
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland Timbers IIGoalVictor EnriquezAssist: Daniel Nunez
  2. Portland Timbers IIYellow cardNicklas Lund
  3. Portland Timbers IIGoalEric Izoita
  4. San Jose Earthquakes IIYellow cardEdwyn Mendoza Magana
  5. San Jose Earthquakes IIAssistEdwyn Mendoza Magana
  6. Portland Timbers IIYellow cardBenjamin Barjolo
  7. San Jose Earthquakes IISubstitutionOn: Jermaine SpiveyOff: Kaedren Spivey
  8. Portland Timbers IIYellow cardVictor Enriquez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Portland Timbers II's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against San Jose Earthquakes II. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

San Jose Earthquakes II
0 : 1
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
2 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II
San Jose Earthquakes II
2 : 2
Portland Timbers II
San Jose Earthquakes II
5 : 0
Portland Timbers II
Portland Timbers II
1 : 1
San Jose Earthquakes II

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Portland Timbers II 2:3 San Jose Earthquakes II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Portland Timbers II and San Jose Earthquakes II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Portland Timbers II won 2, San Jose Earthquakes II won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Portland Timbers II score 1.27 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 2.15. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Portland Timbers II's matches and 69% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.

What form are Portland Timbers II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers II have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portland Timbers II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.