United States - MLSData current as of September 06, 2026

Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: match statistics

Portland Timbers crest
Portland Timbers
6 : 0half-time 4:0
Sporting KC crest
Sporting KC

Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Portland Timbers played against Sporting KC in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 6:0.

Recent form

Portland Timbers has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sporting KC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Portland Timbers scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 2.10. Sporting KC scores 0.80 and allows 2.60. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 70% of Portland Timbers's games and 60% of Sporting KC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Portland Timbers has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 0.88 per game. Portland Timbers takes 10.9 shots per game, while Sporting KC takes 6.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Sporting KC leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Portland Timbers's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Sporting KC, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Portland Timbers have a clear offensive edge: they average 1.75 goals per home match, while Sporting KC score just 0.6 goals on the road, a difference of 1.15 goals per game. The hosts average 9.25 shots and 4.5 on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, whereas Sporting averages only 5.6 shots and 1.8 on target away with an 11% conversion; the hosts’ xG is 1.19 versus the visitors’ 0.71, confirming superior quality of created chances. Defensively Portland concede 2.0 goals on average at home, while Sporting concede 3.0 goals away; in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 goals and won 2 games (1.2 points per match), whereas the visitors scored 2 goals, registered no wins and have only 0.2 points per match. Additionally, Sporting failed to score in 60% of their away matches and conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches versus Portland’s 9, with the visitors’ away goal difference at -12 compared to the hosts’ -1, underlining greater defensive issues for the traveling side. Based on this I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 72% for Portland, 18% for a draw and 10% for an upset by Sporting KC.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS = No is more likely. Sporting KC fail to score in 60% of their matches this season and average just 0.6 away goals (0.4 in last 5). Portland are more potent at home — 1.0 goals per game this season, 1.2 in last 5, xG 1.05 (last 5: 1.26) and 4.2 shots on target per game — but they also concede heavily: 2.2 goals against per game this season (1.8 in last 5), which only partially supports BTTS. The decisive factor is Sporting’s away profile: 100% of their away matches have been over 2.5 goals, and 60% of away games are over 2.5 without BTTS (e.g. 3:0/4:0), which materially reduces the chance Sporting will score. Summing signals and simplifying: Portland score in ~80% of home games (don’t score in 20%), Sporting score in ~40% of away games (don’t score in 60%), giving an approximate BTTS ≈ 0.8×0.4 ≈ 32% for 'Yes' and 68% for 'No'. Therefore I recommend backing 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG values I estimate about 1.59 goals for Portland (xG 1.05 vs opponent defense 2.12) and 1.30 for Sporting KC (xG 0.71 vs defense 1.88), totaling 2.89 goals. Portland averages 1.0 goal from 8.2 shots and 4.2 shots on target, Sporting records 0.6 goals from 5.6 shots and 1.8 shots on target; the 4.2 vs 1.8 difference in shots on target and conversion rates 12% vs 11% favor the hosts in chance creation. Both teams have vulnerable defenses: Portland concedes 2.2 goals per match, Sporting 3.0, and season percentages of matches over 2.5 are 60% for Portland and 100% for Sporting, which increases the likelihood of Over 2.5. A Poisson model gives roughly a 78% base probability for over 1.5 goals and 55% for over 2.5; after weighting seasonal shares I finally assess P(Over 1.5)=83% and P(Over 2.5)=65%, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, the percentages of matches with Both Teams to Score are 80% for Portland and 40% for Sporting, and the league average goals of 3.18 supports the Over selection, particularly on the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Portland has better recent form: in the last 5 matches it won 40% of games (2 of 5) and led at the break in 40% of cases, while Sporting has not won any of the last 5 (0%) and did not lead at half-time (0%). Portland generates higher xG (1.05 vs 0.71), registers more shots on target (4.2 vs 1.8) and concedes fewer goals on a seasonal basis (2.2 vs 3.0), which indicates an advantage in chance creation and slightly better defense. In the first half Portland averages 0.6 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Sporting averages 0.2 scored and 1.2 conceded, so Portland has a higher probability of scoring before the break (0.6 versus 0.2). At home Portland records BTTS in 80% of matches and over the last 5 games it averaged 1.4 points at half-time versus Sporting’s 0.6, which translates into leads at the break often converting into a favorable Full-Time result. Therefore I select the 1/1 scenario (Portland leads at Half-Time and wins Full-Time) as the strongest signal; in the projection I assign approximately a 38% chance of Portland leading at the break, 46% for a Half-Time draw and 16% for Sporting leading at the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

4 : 0
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
Portland TimbersSporting KC
16Shots11
Portland TimbersSporting KC
6Shots on target3
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.81xG1.19
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4Corners4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
52Dangerous attacks40
Portland TimbersSporting KC
11Fouls20
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1Cards5
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.3Goals scored / game0.8
Portland TimbersSporting KC
2.1Goals allowed / game2.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
46%Average possession43%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4.2Shots on target / game3
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.9Shots per game6.9
Portland TimbersSporting KC
4.2Shots on target3
Portland TimbersSporting KC
11.9%Shot conversion11.6%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
46%Possession43%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.27xG for0.88
Portland TimbersSporting KC
2.15xG against2
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Shooting quality

Portland Timbers: BalancedSporting KC: Balanced
Portland TimbersSporting KC
Accuracy (shots on target)39%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Portland Timbers is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 0.2 pts / game - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers
LWLWL
Season result split
30% W10% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-6
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 at home
2-1-1
WLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Sporting KC
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
10% W20% R70% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-7
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-4
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 2.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Portland Timbers is 63% better for: goals scored per game.

1.3 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 0.8 goals / game - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.1 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 2.6 goals / game - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers scoring profile: very strong

Portland Timbers scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Sporting KC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).

Sporting KC scoring profile: very strong

Sporting KC scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).

13Goals scored (season)8
Portland TimbersSporting KC
21Goals conceded (season)26
Portland TimbersSporting KC
3.4Average goals per game3.4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Portland TimbersSporting KC
9Goals conceded (last 5)15
Portland TimbersSporting KC

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
50%2 goals20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
10%3 goals0%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0%4 goals0%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
70%2 goals70%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
30%3 goals60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
10%4 goals20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time30%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
40%Scored in both halves10%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS30%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
60%BTTS - last 560%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time90%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Portland Timbers is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 0.6 pts / game - Sporting KC

Portland Timbers - half-time state
30% leading30% draw40% trailing
Sporting KC - half-time state
10% leading30% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per game (1st half)0.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0.8Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.6
Portland TimbersSporting KC
20%Clean sheet before half-time20%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
40%No goal before half-time60%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.9Points per game (2nd half)0.7
Portland TimbersSporting KC
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
Portland TimbersSporting KC
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Portland TimbersSporting KC
40%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Portland TimbersSporting KC
50%No goal after half-time70%
Portland TimbersSporting KC

Portland Timbers - second-half results

20% W30% R50% P
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sporting KC - second-half results

10% W40% R50% P
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Portland Timbers - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.00
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.8
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Sporting KC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.40
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game1.21.8
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-8
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Portland Timbers
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
4
16-30
4
2
31-45
0
4
46-60
1
2
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sporting KC
ScoredConceded
0
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Portland Timbers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.88
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Sporting KC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Portland TimbersLigaSporting KC
Average goals per game 3.403.20 3.40
Both teams scored 70%59% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 80%
Clean sheets 0%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 90%
Goal after half-time 80%79% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / game
1.29
Away goals / game
+47%
Home attack advantage
+32%
Home defensive advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Portland TimbersGoalKristoffer VeldeAssist: David Pereira da Costa
  2. Sporting KCYellow cardLasser Berg Johnsen
  3. Portland TimbersGoalCole BassettAssist: Kevin Jesús Kelsy Genez
  4. Sporting KCGoalJacob Davis
  5. Portland TimbersYellow cardJosé Luis Caicedo Barrera
  6. Sporting KCYellow cardJacob Davis
  7. Sporting KCYellow cardJayden Reid
  8. Portland TimbersSubstitutionOn: Diego Ferney Chará ZamoraOff: José Luis Caicedo Barrera
  9. Sporting KCYellow cardEthan Bartlow
  10. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Zohran Ludovic BassongOff: Lasser Berg Johnsen
  11. Portland TimbersGoalAriel Lassiter
  12. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Taylor CalheiraOff: Dejan Joveljić
  13. Portland TimbersGoalKevin Jesús Kelsy GenezAssist: Ariel Lassiter
  14. Sporting KCYellow cardOsvaldo Pedro Capemba
  15. Sporting KCSubstitutionOn: Stephen AfrifaOff: Osvaldo Pedro Capemba

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 6:0 Sporting KC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

Portland Timbers score 1.30 goals per game on average and Sporting KC 0.80. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Portland Timbers's matches and 60% of Sporting KC's.

What form are Portland Timbers and Sporting KC in?

Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sporting KC 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.