Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: match statistics
Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Portland Timbers played against Sporting KC in MLS (United States). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 6:0.
Recent form
Portland Timbers has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sporting KC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Portland Timbers scores 1.30 goals per game and allows 2.10. Sporting KC scores 0.80 and allows 2.60. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 70% of Portland Timbers's games and 60% of Sporting KC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Portland Timbers has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 0.88 per game. Portland Timbers takes 10.9 shots per game, while Sporting KC takes 6.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Sporting KC leads at halftime in 10% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Portland Timbers's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For Sporting KC, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Portland Timbers have a clear offensive edge: they average 1.75 goals per home match, while Sporting KC score just 0.6 goals on the road, a difference of 1.15 goals per game. The hosts average 9.25 shots and 4.5 on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, whereas Sporting averages only 5.6 shots and 1.8 on target away with an 11% conversion; the hosts’ xG is 1.19 versus the visitors’ 0.71, confirming superior quality of created chances. Defensively Portland concede 2.0 goals on average at home, while Sporting concede 3.0 goals away; in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 6 goals and won 2 games (1.2 points per match), whereas the visitors scored 2 goals, registered no wins and have only 0.2 points per match. Additionally, Sporting failed to score in 60% of their away matches and conceded 15 goals in their last 5 matches versus Portland’s 9, with the visitors’ away goal difference at -12 compared to the hosts’ -1, underlining greater defensive issues for the traveling side. Based on this I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 72% for Portland, 18% for a draw and 10% for an upset by Sporting KC.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS = No is more likely. Sporting KC fail to score in 60% of their matches this season and average just 0.6 away goals (0.4 in last 5). Portland are more potent at home — 1.0 goals per game this season, 1.2 in last 5, xG 1.05 (last 5: 1.26) and 4.2 shots on target per game — but they also concede heavily: 2.2 goals against per game this season (1.8 in last 5), which only partially supports BTTS. The decisive factor is Sporting’s away profile: 100% of their away matches have been over 2.5 goals, and 60% of away games are over 2.5 without BTTS (e.g. 3:0/4:0), which materially reduces the chance Sporting will score. Summing signals and simplifying: Portland score in ~80% of home games (don’t score in 20%), Sporting score in ~40% of away games (don’t score in 60%), giving an approximate BTTS ≈ 0.8×0.4 ≈ 32% for 'Yes' and 68% for 'No'. Therefore I recommend backing 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG values I estimate about 1.59 goals for Portland (xG 1.05 vs opponent defense 2.12) and 1.30 for Sporting KC (xG 0.71 vs defense 1.88), totaling 2.89 goals. Portland averages 1.0 goal from 8.2 shots and 4.2 shots on target, Sporting records 0.6 goals from 5.6 shots and 1.8 shots on target; the 4.2 vs 1.8 difference in shots on target and conversion rates 12% vs 11% favor the hosts in chance creation. Both teams have vulnerable defenses: Portland concedes 2.2 goals per match, Sporting 3.0, and season percentages of matches over 2.5 are 60% for Portland and 100% for Sporting, which increases the likelihood of Over 2.5. A Poisson model gives roughly a 78% base probability for over 1.5 goals and 55% for over 2.5; after weighting seasonal shares I finally assess P(Over 1.5)=83% and P(Over 2.5)=65%, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, the percentages of matches with Both Teams to Score are 80% for Portland and 40% for Sporting, and the league average goals of 3.18 supports the Over selection, particularly on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Portland has better recent form: in the last 5 matches it won 40% of games (2 of 5) and led at the break in 40% of cases, while Sporting has not won any of the last 5 (0%) and did not lead at half-time (0%). Portland generates higher xG (1.05 vs 0.71), registers more shots on target (4.2 vs 1.8) and concedes fewer goals on a seasonal basis (2.2 vs 3.0), which indicates an advantage in chance creation and slightly better defense. In the first half Portland averages 0.6 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Sporting averages 0.2 scored and 1.2 conceded, so Portland has a higher probability of scoring before the break (0.6 versus 0.2). At home Portland records BTTS in 80% of matches and over the last 5 games it averaged 1.4 points at half-time versus Sporting’s 0.6, which translates into leads at the break often converting into a favorable Full-Time result. Therefore I select the 1/1 scenario (Portland leads at Half-Time and wins Full-Time) as the strongest signal; in the projection I assign approximately a 38% chance of Portland leading at the break, 46% for a Half-Time draw and 16% for Sporting leading at the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Portland Timbers | Sporting KC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Portland Timbers is 500% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 0.2 pts / game - Sporting KC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Portland Timbers is 63% better for: goals scored per game.
1.3 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 0.8 goals / game - Sporting KC
Portland Timbers is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.1 goals / game - Portland Timbers · 2.6 goals / game - Sporting KC
Portland Timbers scores in 70% of games (7 of 10 meczów), while Sporting KC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).
Sporting KC scores in 60% of games (6 of 10 meczów), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
Over / Under - Sporting KC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Portland Timbers is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / game - Portland Timbers · 0.6 pts / game - Sporting KC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sporting KC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Portland Timbers
Sporting KC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Portland Timbers | Liga | Sporting KC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.40 | 3.20 | ▲ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 59% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 60% | 61% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 73% | ▲ 90% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?
The MLS match finished Portland Timbers 6:0 Sporting KC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?
Portland Timbers score 1.30 goals per game on average and Sporting KC 0.80. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Portland Timbers's matches and 60% of Sporting KC's.
What form are Portland Timbers and Sporting KC in?
Over the last 5 games Portland Timbers have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sporting KC 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Portland Timbers vs Sporting KC: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


