Potenza Calcio vs Cavese: match statistics
Potenza Calcio showcases a significantly better home form with a 47% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference at their own stadium. Over their last five matches generally, the hosts have averaged 1.8 points per game, winning three fixtures, while Cavese has a poor away record with just a 13% win rate and a negative goal difference of -10. The xG statistics also favor Potenza (1.54 xGFor vs 1.29 xGFor for Cavese away from home), and the hosts score nearly twice as many goals on average at home (1.53) as the visitors do on the road (0.8). Cavese fails to score in 53% of their away matches, which, combined with Potenza's solid defense (53% clean sheets), grants the home side a clear advantage. Potenza's high home draw percentage (40%) and Cavese's current form suggest a potential splitting of points; however, the hosts' qualitative and statistical edge points towards their victory.
Potenza Calcio vs Cavese: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Potenza Calcio played against Cavese in Serie C Group C (Italy). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Potenza Calcio has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Cavese has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Potenza Calcio scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.45. Cavese scores 0.97 and allows 1.16. Games in this league average 2.47 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 45% of Potenza Calcio's games and 39% of Cavese's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 35%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Potenza Calcio has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.36 per game. Potenza Calcio takes 11.9 shots per game, while Cavese takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Potenza Calcio leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Cavese leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.61 after halftime.
When the teams score
Potenza Calcio's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For Cavese, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group C games average 2.47 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Potenza Calcio showcases a significantly better home form with a 47% win rate and an impressive +10 goal difference at their own stadium. Over their last five matches generally, the hosts have averaged 1.8 points per game, winning three fixtures, while Cavese has a poor away record with just a 13% win rate and a negative goal difference of -10. The xG statistics also favor Potenza (1.54 xGFor vs 1.29 xGFor for Cavese away from home), and the hosts score nearly twice as many goals on average at home (1.53) as the visitors do on the road (0.8). Cavese fails to score in 53% of their away matches, which, combined with Potenza's solid defense (53% clean sheets), grants the home side a clear advantage. Potenza's high home draw percentage (40%) and Cavese's current form suggest a potential splitting of points; however, the hosts' qualitative and statistical edge points towards their victory.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Potenza Calcio | Cavese | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Potenza Calcio is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Potenza Calcio · 1.4 pts / game - Cavese
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Potenza Calcio is 30% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Potenza Calcio · 0.97 goals / game - Cavese
Cavese is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.45 goals / game - Potenza Calcio · 1.16 goals / game - Cavese
Potenza Calcio scores in 68% of games (21 of 31 meczów), while Cavese keeps a clean sheet in 35% (11 of 31 meczów).
Cavese scores in 61% of games (19 of 31 meczów), while Potenza Calcio keeps a clean sheet in 32% (10 of 31 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Potenza Calcio
Over / Under - Cavese
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Potenza Calcio - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Cavese - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Potenza Calcio
Cavese
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group C).
Teams vs league
| Potenza Calcio | Liga | Cavese | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.71 | 2.47 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▼ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 55% | 46% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 32% | 30% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 66% | ▼ 55% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 81% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Potenza Calcio's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Cavese. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Potenza Calcio vs Cavese?
The Serie C Group C match finished Potenza Calcio 2:2 Cavese. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Potenza Calcio vs Cavese?
Potenza Calcio score 1.26 goals per game on average and Cavese 0.97. The Serie C Group C average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Potenza Calcio's matches and 39% of Cavese's.
What form are Potenza Calcio and Cavese in?
Over the last 5 games Potenza Calcio have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Cavese 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Potenza Calcio vs Cavese?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Potenza Calcio vs Cavese: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.