Italy - Serie C Group AData current as of 23 July 2026

Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio: match statistics

Pro Patria crest
Pro Patria
0 : 4half-time 0:1
Giana Erminio crest
Giana Erminio
125%(3.31)
X30%(2.82)
245%(2.26)

Pro Patria is showing disastrous form, having lost all of their last five matches without gaining a single point. The hosts concede an average of 1.73 goals per home match, with a mere 9% win rate and a 55% loss rate. Giana Erminio, despite average away form, possesses much better defensive organization, confirmed by a 60% clean sheet rate on the road and only 0.8 goals conceded on average. The visitors also hold the advantage in possession (56% vs 48%) and scoring efficiency. Given the hosts' dismal streak and Giana Erminio's defensive solidity, I expect an away victory or at most a draw.

Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pro Patria play Giana Erminio in Serie C Group A (Italy). The match date is 17 January 2026 at 17:30. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Pro Patria: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Giana Erminio: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pro Patria scores 0.89 and concedes 1.84 goals per match. Giana Erminio scores 1.00 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pro Patria 53%, Giana Erminio 39%. Over 2.5: Pro Patria 58%, Giana Erminio 32%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Giana Erminio has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.23. Pro Patria: 9.5 shots per match, Giana Erminio: 10.1.

Match halves

Pro Patria: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.63. Giana Erminio: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Pro Patria: 46-60 (9 goals). Giana Erminio: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group A: 2.34 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Pro Patria is showing disastrous form, having lost all of their last five matches without gaining a single point. The hosts concede an average of 1.73 goals per home match, with a mere 9% win rate and a 55% loss rate. Giana Erminio, despite average away form, possesses much better defensive organization, confirmed by a 60% clean sheet rate on the road and only 0.8 goals conceded on average. The visitors also hold the advantage in possession (56% vs 48%) and scoring efficiency. Given the hosts' dismal streak and Giana Erminio's defensive solidity, I expect an away victory or at most a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
7Shots13
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
3Shots on target5
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.14xG1.53
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
4Corners1
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
68Dangerous attacks50
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
18Fouls16
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
2Cards2
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
0.89Goals scored / match1
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.84Goals conceded / match1.03
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
48%Average possession51%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
2.89Shots on target / match3.63
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.47Shots per match10.11
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
2.89Shots on target3.63
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
9.4%Shot conversion9.9%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
48%Possession51%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.23xG for1.38
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.7xG against1.22
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Shooting quality

Pro Patria: BalancedGiana Erminio: Balanced
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Giana Erminio is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Pro Patria · 1.4 pts / match - Giana Erminio

Pro Patria
LDWLL
Season result split
11% W29% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-23
0.61 pts / match · goal difference -36
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-7-10
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
DDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Giana Erminio
LDLWW
Season result split
37% W26% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-14
1.37 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Giana Erminio is 12% better for: goals scored per match.

0.89 goals / match - Pro Patria · 1 goals / match - Giana Erminio

Giana Erminio is 79% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.84 goals / match - Pro Patria · 1.03 goals / match - Giana Erminio

Pro Patria scoring profile: mixed

Pro Patria scores in 58% of matches (22 of 38 matches), while Giana Erminio keeps a clean sheet in 39% (15 of 38 matches).

Giana Erminio scoring profile: very strong

Giana Erminio scores in 66% of matches (25 of 38 matches), while Pro Patria keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 38 matches).

34Goals scored (season)38
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
70Goals conceded (season)39
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
2.74Average goals in match2.03
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
9Goals scored (last 5)7
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal66%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
24%2 goals26%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
5%3 goals5%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
3%4 goals3%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal61%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
66%2 goals29%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
26%3 goals13%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
8%4 goals0%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
5%BTTS in both halves3%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
16%Scored in both halves18%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

BTTS and goal count

45%Min. 3 goals and BTTS26%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
100%BTTS - last 540%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time16%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Giana Erminio is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.76 pts / match - Pro Patria · 1.18 pts / match - Giana Erminio

Pro Patria - half-time state
11% leading45% draw45% trailing
Giana Erminio - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.76Points per match (1st half)1.18
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
0.26Goals scored (1st half)0.37
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
0.84Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.11Average goals (1st half)0.82
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
45%Clean sheet before half-time61%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
76%No goal before half-time63%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)1.21
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.21
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
32%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio
50%No goal after half-time53%
Pro PatriaGiana Erminio

Pro Patria - second-half results

16% W45% R39% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-22
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Giana Erminio - second-half results

24% W50% R26% P
45
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pro Patria - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.41.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Giana Erminio - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pro Patria
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
1
17
16-30
5
10
31-45
9
10
46-60
7
11
61-75
8
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Giana Erminio
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
6
31-45
5
4
46-60
8
9
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.38
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pro Patria

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
169%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Giana Erminio

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).

Teams vs league

Pro PatriaLigaGiana Erminio
Average goals in match 2.742.34 2.03
Both teams scored 53%50% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%43% 32%
Clean sheets 16%30% 39%
Goal before half-time 66%66% 63%
Goal after half-time 79%73% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.34
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pro Patria 0 - 0 - 1 Giana Erminio. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Giana Erminio
2 : 1
Pro Patria

FAQ

What was the result of Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio?

The Serie C Group A match finished Pro Patria 0:4 Giana Erminio. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio?

Pro Patria score 0.89 goals per game on average and Giana Erminio 1.00. The Serie C Group A average is 2.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Pro Patria's matches and 39% of Giana Erminio's.

What form are Pro Patria and Giana Erminio in?

Over the last 5 games Pro Patria have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Giana Erminio 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio?

The statistical background for Pro Patria vs Giana Erminio — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.