Pro Vercelli vs Lumezzane: match statistics
The analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. Pro Vercelli has a better home record (44% wins), but their recent form is disastrous - only 1 win in the last 5 matches and 0.6 points per game. Lumezzane displays much better form in recent matches (1.6 points per game, 2 wins and 2 draws in the last 5 matches), which compensates for their weaker away statistics. Both teams have an identical average of goals conceded away/home (1.13), as well as a similar percentage of matches without conceding a goal (44%). Pro Vercelli's xG advantage at home (1.54 vs 1.29) is neutralized by the visitors' better form and defensive solidity in recent weeks. The difference in goal difference (-1 for the hosts, -4 for the visitors) is not significant enough to decide the outcome of this evenly matched encounter.
Pro Vercelli vs Lumezzane: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pro Vercelli played against Lumezzane in Serie C Group A (Italy). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Pro Vercelli has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Lumezzane has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Pro Vercelli scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 1.44. Lumezzane scores 1.06 and allows 1.03. Games in this league average 2.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Pro Vercelli's games and 47% of Lumezzane's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 34%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Pro Vercelli has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.37 per game. Pro Vercelli takes 11.5 shots per game, while Lumezzane takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Pro Vercelli leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Lumezzane leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pro Vercelli's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Lumezzane, it is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group A games average 2.27 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The analysis indicates very even chances for both teams, suggesting a draw as the most likely outcome. Pro Vercelli has a better home record (44% wins), but their recent form is disastrous - only 1 win in the last 5 matches and 0.6 points per game. Lumezzane displays much better form in recent matches (1.6 points per game, 2 wins and 2 draws in the last 5 matches), which compensates for their weaker away statistics. Both teams have an identical average of goals conceded away/home (1.13), as well as a similar percentage of matches without conceding a goal (44%). Pro Vercelli's xG advantage at home (1.54 vs 1.29) is neutralized by the visitors' better form and defensive solidity in recent weeks. The difference in goal difference (-1 for the hosts, -4 for the visitors) is not significant enough to decide the outcome of this evenly matched encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pro Vercelli | Lumezzane | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Lumezzane is 167% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Pro Vercelli · 1.6 pts / game - Lumezzane
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lumezzane is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.44 goals / game - Pro Vercelli · 1.03 goals / game - Lumezzane
Pro Vercelli scores in 66% of games (21 of 32 meczów), while Lumezzane keeps a clean sheet in 41% (13 of 32 meczów).
Lumezzane scores in 75% of games (24 of 32 meczów), while Pro Vercelli keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pro Vercelli
Over / Under - Lumezzane
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lumezzane is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Pro Vercelli · 1.47 pts / game - Lumezzane
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pro Vercelli - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Lumezzane - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 34%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pro Vercelli
Lumezzane
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).
Teams vs league
| Pro Vercelli | Liga | Lumezzane | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.53 | 2.27 | ▼ 2.09 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 41% | ▼ 34% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 28% | 31% | ▲ 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 72% | 65% | ▲ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 71% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Pro Vercelli's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Lumezzane. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pro Vercelli vs Lumezzane?
The Serie C Group A match finished Pro Vercelli 1:1 Lumezzane. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Pro Vercelli vs Lumezzane?
Pro Vercelli score 1.09 goals per game on average and Lumezzane 1.06. The Serie C Group A average is 2.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Pro Vercelli's matches and 47% of Lumezzane's.
What form are Pro Vercelli and Lumezzane in?
Over the last 5 games Pro Vercelli have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Lumezzane 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pro Vercelli vs Lumezzane?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.