Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 22 July 2026

Proxy vs Dayrout: match statistics

Proxy crest
Proxy
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Dayrout crest
Dayrout
165%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

As hosts, Proxy display solid home form with 40% wins and only 20% losses at their own stadium, maintaining an average of 1.5 xG and a goal difference of 0. Dayrout performs very poorly as visitors—suffering 78% away losses, with only 11% wins and a dramatic goal difference of -13. The visitors have failed to score in their last 5 matches overall and have failed to find the net in 67% of away games. Proxy possesses a higher average of shots on target (4.5 vs 2.57) and better chance conversion, which, given Dayrout's weak defense (1.78 goals conceded on average away), gives the hosts a clear advantage. Considering all statistical parameters, a victory for Proxy is the most probable scenario for this match.

Proxy vs Dayrout: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Proxy play Dayrout in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 29 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Proxy: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Dayrout: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Proxy scores 1.21 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Dayrout scores 0.65 and concedes 0.97. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Proxy 59%, Dayrout 26%. Over 2.5: Proxy 38%, Dayrout 24%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Proxy has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.18. Proxy: 8.0 shots per match, Dayrout: 5.6.

Match halves

Proxy: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74. Dayrout: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Proxy: 76-90+ (13 goals). Dayrout: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

As hosts, Proxy display solid home form with 40% wins and only 20% losses at their own stadium, maintaining an average of 1.5 xG and a goal difference of 0. Dayrout performs very poorly as visitors—suffering 78% away losses, with only 11% wins and a dramatic goal difference of -13. The visitors have failed to score in their last 5 matches overall and have failed to find the net in 67% of away games. Proxy possesses a higher average of shots on target (4.5 vs 2.57) and better chance conversion, which, given Dayrout's weak defense (1.78 goals conceded on average away), gives the hosts a clear advantage. Considering all statistical parameters, a victory for Proxy is the most probable scenario for this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
ProxyDayrout
14Shots10
ProxyDayrout
3Shots on target4
ProxyDayrout
1.58xG1.21
ProxyDayrout
6Corners4
ProxyDayrout
68Dangerous attacks42
ProxyDayrout
12Fouls24
ProxyDayrout
0Cards0
ProxyDayrout

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.21Goals scored / match0.65
ProxyDayrout
0.91Goals conceded / match0.97
ProxyDayrout
42%Average possession30%
ProxyDayrout
3.06Shots on target / match1.76
ProxyDayrout

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8Shots per match5.59
ProxyDayrout
3.06Shots on target1.76
ProxyDayrout
15.1%Shot conversion11.6%
ProxyDayrout
42%Possession30%
ProxyDayrout
1.32xG for1.18
ProxyDayrout
1.31xG against1.17
ProxyDayrout

Shooting quality

Proxy: Counter-attackingDayrout: Balanced
ProxyDayrout
Accuracy (shots on target)38%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Proxy is 63% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Proxy · 1.6 pts / match - Dayrout

Proxy
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
38% W47% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-16-5
1.62 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-8-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Dayrout
DDWWL
Season result split
24% W41% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-14-12
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-9
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Proxy is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1.21 goals / match - Proxy · 0.65 goals / match - Dayrout

Proxy is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Proxy · 0.97 goals / match - Dayrout

Proxy scoring profile: strong

Proxy scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Dayrout keeps a clean sheet in 50% (17 of 34 matches).

Dayrout scoring profile: mixed

Dayrout scores in 50% of matches (17 of 34 matches), while Proxy keeps a clean sheet in 38% (13 of 34 matches).

41Goals scored (season)22
ProxyDayrout
31Goals conceded (season)33
ProxyDayrout
2.12Average goals in match1.62
ProxyDayrout
11Goals scored (last 5)7
ProxyDayrout
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
ProxyDayrout

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal50%
ProxyDayrout
26%2 goals12%
ProxyDayrout
12%3 goals3%
ProxyDayrout
3%4 goals0%
ProxyDayrout

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal50%
ProxyDayrout
21%2 goals24%
ProxyDayrout
6%3 goals12%
ProxyDayrout
3%4 goals6%
ProxyDayrout

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time6%
ProxyDayrout
3%BTTS in both halves0%
ProxyDayrout
15%Scored in both halves6%
ProxyDayrout

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
ProxyDayrout
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
ProxyDayrout
80%BTTS - last 540%
ProxyDayrout

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time32%
ProxyDayrout
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
ProxyDayrout
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
ProxyDayrout

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
ProxyDayrout
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
ProxyDayrout
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
ProxyDayrout

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Proxy is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.26 pts / match - Proxy · 0.97 pts / match - Dayrout

Proxy - half-time state
21% leading65% draw15% trailing
Dayrout - half-time state
9% leading71% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.26Points per match (1st half)0.97
ProxyDayrout
0.47Goals scored (1st half)0.15
ProxyDayrout
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
ProxyDayrout
0.85Average goals (1st half)0.47
ProxyDayrout
65%Clean sheet before half-time76%
ProxyDayrout
56%No goal before half-time85%
ProxyDayrout

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per match (2nd half)1.35
ProxyDayrout
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
ProxyDayrout
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
ProxyDayrout
1.26Average goals (2nd half)0.91
ProxyDayrout
59%Clean sheet after half-time71%
ProxyDayrout
50%No goal after half-time65%
ProxyDayrout

Proxy - second-half results

44% W35% R21% P
43
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding181%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dayrout - second-half results

29% W47% R24% P
33
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding267%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Proxy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dayrout - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.202.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.41.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Proxy
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
4
2
16-30
7
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
5
8
61-75
13
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Dayrout
ScoredConceded
4
6
0-15
1
8
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.87
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Proxy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.98
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Dayrout

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

ProxyLigaDayrout
Average goals in match 2.121.95 1.62
Both teams scored 59%41% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%32% 24%
Clean sheets 38%38% 50%
Goal before half-time 56%53% 32%
Goal after half-time 71%67% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Proxy 0 - 1 - 0 Dayrout. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Dayrout
1 : 1
Proxy

FAQ

What was the result of Proxy vs Dayrout?

The Second Division match finished Proxy 0:0 Dayrout. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Proxy vs Dayrout?

Proxy score 1.21 goals per game on average and Dayrout 0.65. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Proxy's matches and 26% of Dayrout's.

What form are Proxy and Dayrout in?

Over the last 5 games Proxy have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Dayrout 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Proxy vs Dayrout?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Proxy vs Dayrout: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.