Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 04, 2026

PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: match statistics

PSBS Biak Numfor crest
PSBS Biak Numfor
2 : 5half-time 2:4
Arema crest
Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSBS Biak Numfor played against Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on May 15, 2026. Final score: 2:5.

Recent form

PSBS Biak Numfor has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Arema has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

PSBS Biak Numfor scores 0.91 goals per game and allows 2.59. Arema scores 1.41 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 56% of PSBS Biak Numfor's games and 63% of Arema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 72% and 59%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Arema has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.23 per game. PSBS Biak Numfor takes 10.5 shots per game, while Arema takes 11.7.

First-half and second-half trends

PSBS Biak Numfor leads at halftime in 9% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Arema leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.97 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSBS Biak Numfor's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). For Arema, it is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema is the favorite in this match and I forecast an away win. Arema sits 10th with 11 wins and 45 goals this season, while PSBS Biak Numfor are 18th with only 4 wins and 29 goals. In their last 5 matches PSBS have not scored, lost all 5 and conceded 19 goals (3.8 per game), whereas Arema have scored 7 in their last 5 and are averaging 1.4 points per game over that stretch. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge: PSBS concede 2.25 goals per home game versus Arema conceding 1.25 on the road; additionally PSBS fail to score in 56% of home matches while Arema are goalless in only 25% of away fixtures. Despite similar xG (PSBS at home 1.38 vs Arema away 1.34), Arema’s superior finishing (10% vs 8%) and greater number of shots on target (3.94 vs 3.44) lead me to the probability assessment: Arema 70%, draw 20%, home win 10%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal indicators suggest a moderate chance against BTTS - both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 63% (PSBS 63% and Arema 63%), versus a league average of 52%. A strong signal against BTTS is PSBS form: in the last 5 matches they have scored 0 goals, conceded 19 (3.8 per match) and their recent attacking xG dropped to 0.78 compared to a seasonal xG of 1.46. Arema have 7 goals in their last 5 (1.4 per match), concede on average 1.4 and have a seasonal attacking xG of 1.34, so they are the more likely scorers against PSBS’s very unstable defense (PSBS have conceded 83 goals this season). Shot stats show PSBS average 4.5 shots on target per match with a 14% conversion rate, but recently this hasn’t translated into goals, while Arema average 3.94 shots on target with a 10% conversion and have better recent scoring form (7 goals in last 5). Given PSBS’s zero goals in the last 5 and Arema’s clear ability to score, I assign 70% to “no” (No BTTS) and 30% to “yes” (BTTS - Yes); recommendation: no.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG-based model: xG for PSBS is 1.46, xG for Arema is 1.34, xG against Arema 1.75 and against PSBS 1.37; averaging yields expected 1.61 goals for the home side and 1.36 for the away side, totaling 2.97 goals. Seasonal averages confirm offensive potential and defensive weaknesses: PSBS scores 1.69 and concedes 1.50 per match, Arema scores 1.13 and concedes 1.25, with PSBS suffering as many as 83 goals conceded this season versus 44 conceded by Arema. Percentage-wise Over 1.5 occurred in 88% of PSBS matches and 75% of Arema matches (avg ~82%), Over 2.5 respectively 75% and 44% (avg ~60%), and Over 3.5 31% and 25% (avg ~28%), which gives the strongest signal for the 1.5 line. Additionally, both teams scored in 63% of matches, hosts average 11.75 shots with a 14% conversion rate, and visitors 11.56 with a 10% conversion, supporting at least two goals. As a result I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest and most reliable bet (≈82% probability); Over 2.5 is attractive (≈60%) but less certain, while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (≈28%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal indicates the home side leading at half-time: PSBS led at the break in 7 matches (44%) and averages 0.63 goals in the first half versus Arema's 0.25, which favors the hosts in the opening 45 minutes. Over 90 minutes PSBS records 1.69 goals per match compared to Arema's 1.13 and has an xG of 1.46, while Arema concedes an average xG of 1.75, increasing the likelihood of home goals. Additionally, PSBS has better conversion (14% vs 10%) and more shots on target (4.5 vs 3.94), and their home win rate is 44% versus Arema’s 25% away win rate, which strengthens the scenario of maintaining the lead and securing the victory. However, form risk must be considered: in the last five matches the hosts’ form is 'lllll' and in those games they averaged 0 goals scored and 3.8 conceded, so half-time draw variants (1/X) and a full-time draw (X/X) remain a material risk.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 4
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

42Possession (%)58
PSBS Biak NumforArema
12Shots24
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2Shots on target10
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.17xG2.9
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1Corners7
PSBS Biak NumforArema
37Dangerous attacks96
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9Fouls14
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3Cards2
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.91Goals scored / game1.41
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2.59Goals allowed / game1.38
PSBS Biak NumforArema
45%Average possession48%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.47Shots on target / game4.22
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.53Shots per game11.66
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.47Shots on target4.22
PSBS Biak NumforArema
8.6%Shot conversion12.1%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
45%Possession48%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.23xG for1.4
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2xG against1.56
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Shooting quality

PSBS Biak Numfor: BalancedArema: Balanced
PSBS Biak NumforArema
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSBS Biak Numfor
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W19% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-22
0.56 pts / game · goal difference -54
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-10
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 3.8xG: 0.79Opponent xG: 2.67BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 60%
Arema
WDLLW
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-7-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 55% better for: goals scored per game.

0.91 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.41 goals / game - Arema

Arema is 88% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.59 goals / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.38 goals / game - Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor scoring profile: strong

PSBS Biak Numfor scores in 56% of games (18 of 32 meczów), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 81% of games (26 of 32 meczów), while PSBS Biak Numfor keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)45
PSBS Biak NumforArema
83Goals conceded (season)44
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3.5Average goals per game2.78
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0Goals scored (last 5)7
PSBS Biak NumforArema
19Goals conceded (last 5)7
PSBS Biak NumforArema

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal81%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
25%2 goals44%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
6%3 goals13%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
3%4 goals3%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal75%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
69%2 goals41%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
41%3 goals16%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
28%4 goals6%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
PSBS Biak Numfor - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 32 meczów
52%
League average

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time9%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9%BTTS in both halves3%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
9%Scored in both halves19%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0%BTTS - last 520%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
66%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
44%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Arema is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.75 pts / game - PSBS Biak Numfor · 1.31 pts / game - Arema

PSBS Biak Numfor - half-time state
9% leading47% draw44% trailing
Arema - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.75Points per game (1st half)1.31
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.44
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.03
PSBS Biak NumforArema
41%Clean sheet before half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
72%No goal before half-time59%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per game (2nd half)1.66
PSBS Biak NumforArema
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.97
PSBS Biak NumforArema
1.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
PSBS Biak NumforArema
2.31Average goals (2nd half)1.75
PSBS Biak NumforArema
25%Clean sheet after half-time47%
PSBS Biak NumforArema
63%No goal after half-time41%
PSBS Biak NumforArema

PSBS Biak Numfor - second-half results

16% W22% R63% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-42
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Arema - second-half results

47% W25% R28% P
42
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding110%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSBS Biak Numfor - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.20
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.63.2
Average goals per game0.63.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-3-16
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Arema - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game0.41.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSBS Biak Numfor
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
9
16-30
9
10
31-45
3
12
46-60
5
19
61-75
8
27
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (27). Late-goal balance (76-90): -19 - late phases are a weakness.

Arema
ScoredConceded
3
9
0-15
5
4
16-30
6
6
31-45
10
6
46-60
6
4
61-75
15
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.15
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSBS Biak Numfor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.77
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
59%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
212%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSBS Biak NumforLigaArema
Average goals per game 3.502.76 2.78
Both teams scored 56%52% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%53% 59%
Clean sheets 9%27% 25%
Goal before half-time 66%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 84%82% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.22
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardPatrias Rumere
  2. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardClaudio Lucas Morais Ferreira dos Santos
  3. PSBS Biak NumforYellow cardMohcine Hassan Nader
  4. AremaYellow cardIlham Rio Fahmi
  5. AremaSubstitutionOn: Jayus HarionoOff: Arkhan Fikri
  6. AremaSubstitutionOn: Dwiki MardiyantoOff: Gustavo Franca Amadio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from PSBS Biak Numfor's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Arema. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Arema
4 : 1
PSBS Biak Numfor

FAQ

What was the result of PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

The Liga 1 match finished PSBS Biak Numfor 2:5 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

PSBS Biak Numfor score 0.91 goals per game on average and Arema 1.41. The Liga 1 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 56% of PSBS Biak Numfor's matches and 63% of Arema's.

What form are PSBS Biak Numfor and Arema in?

Over the last 5 games PSBS Biak Numfor have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Arema 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSBS Biak Numfor vs Arema: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.