Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 13, 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bali United: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
3 : 3half-time 0:2
Bali United crest
Bali United
135%(0.00)
X35%(0.00)
230%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a very even meeting. PSIM Yogyakarta presents solid home form with 40% victories and impressive 61% ball possession, however, the last five overall matches brought only 1 point per match. Bali United can boast better away efficiency (50% victories and an average of 2 goals per match), but their current form is worrying – just 0.8 points per match in the last five meetings and three defeats in a row. The goal difference of both teams is similar, and xG values suggest balanced offensive quality. Taking into account the weak disposition of both teams in recent weeks and PSIM's advantage in ball possession at their own stadium, the most probable scenario seems to be a draw.

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bali United: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSIM Yogyakarta played against Bali United in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 23, 2026. Final score: 3:3.

Recent form

PSIM Yogyakarta has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Bali United has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.24 goals per game and allows 1.19. Bali United scores 1.33 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 48% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 52% of Bali United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 48%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.52 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 12.8 shots per game, while Bali United takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. Bali United leads at halftime in 19% and scores 0.95 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). For Bali United, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a very even meeting. PSIM Yogyakarta presents solid home form with 40% victories and impressive 61% ball possession, however, the last five overall matches brought only 1 point per match. Bali United can boast better away efficiency (50% victories and an average of 2 goals per match), but their current form is worrying – just 0.8 points per match in the last five meetings and three defeats in a row. The goal difference of both teams is similar, and xG values suggest balanced offensive quality. Taking into account the weak disposition of both teams in recent weeks and PSIM's advantage in ball possession at their own stadium, the most probable scenario seems to be a draw.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
3 : 1
Second half

Game stats

68Possession (%)32
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
20Shots13
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
7Shots on target5
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
2.55xG1.54
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
6Corners2
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
110Dangerous attacks51
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
5Fouls9
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1Cards5
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1.24Goals scored / game1.33
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1.19Goals allowed / game1.33
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
59%Average possession50%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
4.43Shots on target / game4.67
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.76Shots per game12.95
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
4.43Shots on target4.67
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
9.7%Shot conversion10.3%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
59%Possession50%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1.55xG for1.52
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1.41xG against1.51
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedBali United: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.8 pts / game - Bali United

PSIM Yogyakarta
WLLDD
Season result split
38% W38% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-8-5
1.52 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Bali United
WDLLL
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-7
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Bali United is 7% better for: goals scored per game.

1.24 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.33 goals / game - Bali United

PSIM Yogyakarta is 12% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.19 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.33 goals / game - Bali United

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while Bali United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).

Bali United scoring profile: strong

Bali United scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)28
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
25Goals conceded (season)28
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
2.43Average goals per game2.67
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
6Goals scored (last 5)8
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal76%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
38%2 goals38%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
10%3 goals19%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal62%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
38%2 goals33%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
14%3 goals29%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
5%4 goals5%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time19%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
5%BTTS in both halves10%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
19%Scored in both halves29%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
40%BTTS - last 560%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time24%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1 pts / game - Bali United

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
19% leading52% draw29% trailing
Bali United - half-time state
19% leading43% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per game (1st half)1
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.38
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0.81Average goals (1st half)1.05
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
62%Clean sheet before half-time62%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
71%No goal before half-time62%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.62Points per game (2nd half)1.62
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
0.76Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
1.62Average goals (2nd half)1.62
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United
33%No goal after half-time33%
PSIM YogyakartaBali United

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

43% W33% D24% L
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Bali United - second-half results

43% W33% D24% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.20
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Bali United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.602.00
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game1.40.6
Average goals per game1.81.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-5+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
6
4
31-45
4
4
46-60
8
3
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Bali United
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
3
7
31-45
6
2
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+57%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.52
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Bali United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaBali United
Average goals per game 2.432.60 2.67
Both teams scored 48%54% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%50% 48%
Clean sheets 38%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 52%69% 57%
Goal after half-time 86%83% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Bali UnitedGoalThijmen GoppelAssist: Irfan Jaya
  2. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Rio HardiawanOff: Raka Cahyana Rizky
  3. Bali UnitedYellow cardBoris Kopitović
  4. Bali UnitedGoalIrfan JayaAssist: Thijmen Goppel
  5. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Andi IrfanOff: Riyatno Abiyoso
  6. Bali UnitedRed cardJoão Vitor Ferrari Silva
  7. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Donny WarmerdamOff: Yusaku Yamadera
  8. Bali UnitedGoalRicky Fajrin Saputra
  9. PSIM YogyakartaGoalFranco Gastón Ramos MingoAssist: Nermin Haljeta
  10. Bali UnitedYellow cardMaouri Ananda Yves Ramli Simon
  11. Bali UnitedYellow cardDiego Campos
  12. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from PSIM Yogyakarta's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Bali United. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Bali United
1 : 3
PSIM Yogyakarta

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bali United?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 3:3 Bali United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bali United?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.24 goals per game on average and Bali United 1.33. The Liga 1 average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 48% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 52% of Bali United's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Bali United in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Bali United 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bali United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.