PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bhayangkara: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSIM Yogyakarta played against Bhayangkara in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on November 22, 2025. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

PSIM Yogyakarta has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Bhayangkara has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 1.18. Bhayangkara scores 1.00 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 36% of Bhayangkara's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 18%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.48 to 1.21 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 11.7 shots per game, while Bhayangkara takes 9.8.

First-half and second-half trends

PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.91 goals per game after halftime. Bhayangkara leads at halftime in 45% and scores 0.45 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Bhayangkara, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

63Possession (%)37
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
11Shots7
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
2Shots on target4
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.39xG1.2
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
2Corners3
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
75Dangerous attacks65
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
14Fouls14
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
5Cards3
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.36Goals scored / game1
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.18Goals allowed / game0.64
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
57%Average possession45%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
4.45Shots on target / game2.82
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.73Shots per game9.82
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
4.45Shots on target2.82
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
11.6%Shot conversion10.2%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
57%Possession45%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.48xG for1.21
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.45xG against1.15
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedBhayangkara: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
Accuracy (shots on target)38%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Bhayangkara is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2 pts / game - Bhayangkara

PSIM Yogyakarta
DLWWD
Season result split
45% W36% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-2
1.73 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Bhayangkara
LWWDW
Season result split
45% W27% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-3
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 36% better for: goals scored per game.

1.36 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1 goals / game - Bhayangkara

Bhayangkara is 84% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.18 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.64 goals / game - Bhayangkara

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 meczów), while Bhayangkara keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).

Bhayangkara scoring profile: strong

Bhayangkara scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)11
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
13Goals conceded (season)7
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
2.55Average goals per game1.64
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
6Goals scored (last 5)6
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal73%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
45%2 goals27%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
9%3 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal55%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
27%2 goals9%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
18%3 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
9%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
18%Scored in both halves27%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
40%BTTS - last 540%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Bhayangkara is 36% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.73 pts / game - Bhayangkara

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
27% leading45% draw27% trailing
Bhayangkara - half-time state
45% leading36% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)1.73
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.55
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.27
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0.82Average goals (1st half)0.82
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
64%Clean sheet before half-time73%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
73%No goal before half-time45%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

After half-time (2nd half)

1.82Points per game (2nd half)1.36
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0.91Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
0.82Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
1.73Average goals (2nd half)0.82
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
55%Clean sheet after half-time64%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara
27%No goal after half-time55%
PSIM YogyakartaBhayangkara

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

55% W18% D27% L
14
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Bhayangkara - second-half results

27% W55% D18% L
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.73
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Bhayangkara - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.40
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
2
46-60
5
2
61-75
4
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Bhayangkara
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Bhayangkara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
46%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 36% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaBhayangkara
Average goals per game 2.552.56 1.64
Both teams scored 55%59% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 45%51% 18%
Clean sheets 36%24% 45%
Goal before half-time 55%68% 73%
Goal after half-time 91%87% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.17
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardAnton Fase
  2. BhayangkaraYellow cardMoisés Wolschick
  3. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardRio Hardiawan
  4. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente
  5. BhayangkaraSubstitutionOn: Stjepan PlazonjaOff: Ryan Kurnia
  6. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardYusaku Yamadera
  7. BhayangkaraYellow cardMuhammad Ferarri
  8. BhayangkaraSubstitutionOn: Sani Rizki FauziOff: Lautaro Belleggia
  9. BhayangkaraYellow cardSani Rizki Fauzi
  10. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Dede SafariOff: Reva Adi Utama
  11. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardDeri Anthony Corfe
  12. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Riyatno AbiyosoOff: Nolberto Ezequiel Vidal

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bhayangkara?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 1:0 Bhayangkara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bhayangkara?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.36 goals per game on average and Bhayangkara 1.00. The Liga 1 average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 55% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 36% of Bhayangkara's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Bhayangkara in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Bhayangkara 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bhayangkara?

The statistical background for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Bhayangkara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.