Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 07, 2026

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo: match statistics

PSIM Yogyakarta crest
PSIM Yogyakarta
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Persis Solo crest
Persis Solo
165%(1.76)
X22%(3.49)
213%(4.13)

PSIM Yogyakarta presents decidedly better form and statistics compared to Persis Solo. The hosts sit in 7th place with a record of 8 victories, while the visitors are in last place (18th) with only 2 wins this season. At home, PSIM achieves 44% wins, 33% clean sheets, and averages 1.22 goals per match, with a balanced goal difference (0). Persis Solo has disastrous form in away matches - 60% losses, merely 20% wins, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per match with a goal difference of -9. The last 5 matches confirm this trend: PSIM earned 4 points (1.4 PPG), whereas Persis earned only 3 points (0.6 PPG) with a form of four defeats. Higher xG values for the hosts (1.58 vs 1.11) and a significant advantage in possession (60% vs 50%) further advocate for a PSIM Yogyakarta win.

PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSIM Yogyakarta played against Persis Solo in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on February 6, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

PSIM Yogyakarta has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Persis Solo has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

PSIM Yogyakarta scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.21. Persis Solo scores 1.05 and allows 2.11. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 47% of PSIM Yogyakarta's games and 63% of Persis Solo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 68%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.25 per game. PSIM Yogyakarta takes 12.7 shots per game, while Persis Solo takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Persis Solo leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSIM Yogyakarta's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Persis Solo, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PSIM Yogyakarta presents decidedly better form and statistics compared to Persis Solo. The hosts sit in 7th place with a record of 8 victories, while the visitors are in last place (18th) with only 2 wins this season. At home, PSIM achieves 44% wins, 33% clean sheets, and averages 1.22 goals per match, with a balanced goal difference (0). Persis Solo has disastrous form in away matches - 60% losses, merely 20% wins, conceding an average of 1.9 goals per match with a goal difference of -9. The last 5 matches confirm this trend: PSIM earned 4 points (1.4 PPG), whereas Persis earned only 3 points (0.6 PPG) with a form of four defeats. Higher xG values for the hosts (1.58 vs 1.11) and a significant advantage in possession (60% vs 50%) further advocate for a PSIM Yogyakarta win.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

65Possession (%)35
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
18Shots9
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
5Shots on target3
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.89xG0.95
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
7Corners2
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
57Dangerous attacks24
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
10Fouls8
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
2Cards2
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.26Goals scored / game1.05
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.21Goals allowed / game2.11
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
59%Average possession50%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
4.47Shots on target / game3.79
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.74Shots per game9.47
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
4.47Shots on target3.79
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
9.9%Shot conversion11.1%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
59%Possession50%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.55xG for1.25
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.43xG against1.72
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

Shooting quality

PSIM Yogyakarta: BalancedPersis Solo: Balanced
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
Accuracy (shots on target)35%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 133% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.6 pts / game - Persis Solo

PSIM Yogyakarta
DWWLL
Season result split
42% W32% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-6-5
1.58 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Persis Solo
LLWLL
Season result split
11% W21% R68% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-13
0.53 pts / game · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 20% better for: goals scored per game.

1.26 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 1.05 goals / game - Persis Solo

PSIM Yogyakarta is 74% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.21 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 2.11 goals / game - Persis Solo

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: very strong

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 79% of games (15 of 19 meczów), while Persis Solo keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 meczów).

Persis Solo scoring profile: strong

Persis Solo scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)20
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
23Goals conceded (season)40
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
2.47Average goals per game3.16
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
7Goals scored (last 5)5
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal63%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
37%2 goals32%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
11%3 goals11%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0%4 goals0%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal95%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
37%2 goals74%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
16%3 goals26%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
5%4 goals11%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time21%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0%BTTS in both halves11%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
16%Scored in both halves26%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
40%BTTS - last 560%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSIM Yogyakarta is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta · 0.79 pts / game - Persis Solo

PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing
Persis Solo - half-time state
16% leading32% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per game (1st half)0.79
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.37
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0.42Goals conceded (1st half)1
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0.79Average goals (1st half)1.37
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
63%Clean sheet before half-time32%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
74%No goal before half-time63%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.68Points per game (2nd half)0.89
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
0.79Goals conceded (2nd half)1.11
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.79
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
53%Clean sheet after half-time32%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo
32%No goal after half-time47%
PSIM YogyakartaPersis Solo

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

47% W26% R26% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Persis Solo - second-half results

21% W26% R53% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding69%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 11%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.00
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Persis Solo - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.202.20
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game1.60.2
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-7+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
3
46-60
7
3
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Persis Solo
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
0
6
16-30
3
8
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.81
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

Persis Solo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSIM YogyakartaLigaPersis Solo
Average goals per game 2.472.57 3.16
Both teams scored 47%53% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%48% 68%
Clean sheets 37%27% 5%
Goal before half-time 53%68% 84%
Goal after half-time 89%82% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.11
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardMuhammad Rendra Teddy Wijanarko
  2. Persis SoloYellow cardRoman Paparyga
  3. Persis SoloSubstitutionOn: Septian Satria BagaskaraOff: Andrei Alba
  4. Persis SoloYellow cardSeptian Satria Bagaskara
  5. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Rio HardiawanOff: Raka Cahyana Rizky
  6. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardRio Hardiawan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Yoko SupriantoMatches officiated: 9
5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 244%Home wins22%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from PSIM Yogyakarta's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Persis Solo. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Persis Solo
2 : 2
PSIM Yogyakarta

FAQ

What was the result of PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo?

The Liga 1 match finished PSIM Yogyakarta 0:0 Persis Solo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo?

PSIM Yogyakarta score 1.26 goals per game on average and Persis Solo 1.05. The Liga 1 average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 47% of PSIM Yogyakarta's matches and 63% of Persis Solo's.

What form are PSIM Yogyakarta and Persis Solo in?

Over the last 5 games PSIM Yogyakarta have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Persis Solo 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIM Yogyakarta vs Persis Solo: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.