PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: match statistics
PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.
PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PSIS Semarang played against Kendal Tornado in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 30, 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Recent form
PSIS Semarang has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kendal Tornado has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
PSIS Semarang scores 0.53 goals per game and allows 2.06. Kendal Tornado scores 1.57 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of PSIS Semarang's games and 43% of Kendal Tornado's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 57%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kendal Tornado has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.13 per game. PSIS Semarang takes 6.6 shots per game, while Kendal Tornado takes 8.7.
First-half and second-half trends
PSIS Semarang leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.29 goals per game after halftime. Kendal Tornado leads at halftime in 43% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
PSIS Semarang's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Kendal Tornado, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PSIS Semarang is displaying very poor home form with 75% losses and only 25% wins at home, conceding an average of 2.38 goals per match. Despite a 100% loss rate on the road this season, Kendal Tornado shows much better recent general form (1.6 PPG vs 1.2 PPG for the hosts) and a solid defense (only 5 conceded goals in 6 away matches). The hosts have the advantage in possession (55% vs 46%) and higher xG (1.59 vs 0.89), however, their catastrophic conversion rate (6%) and -15 goal difference in home matches are alarming. Considering the weakness of both teams in scoring goals (averaging 0.5 goals per match each) and the fact that both frequently fail to score, I expect a low score and a draw as the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PSIS Semarang | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 54% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kendal Tornado is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - PSIS Semarang · 2 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kendal Tornado is 196% better for: goals scored per game.
0.53 goals / game - PSIS Semarang · 1.57 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
Kendal Tornado is 140% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.06 goals / game - PSIS Semarang · 0.86 goals / game - Kendal Tornado
PSIS Semarang scores in 47% of games (8 of 17 meczów), while Kendal Tornado keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 meczów).
Kendal Tornado scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSIS Semarang
Over / Under - Kendal Tornado
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kendal Tornado is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.82 pts / game - PSIS Semarang · 1.86 pts / game - Kendal Tornado
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSIS Semarang - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 18%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kendal Tornado - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PSIS Semarang
Kendal Tornado
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSIS Semarang | Liga | Kendal Tornado | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.59 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.43 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 47% | ▼ 43% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 30% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 69% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | • 76% | 77% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from PSIS Semarang's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kendal Tornado. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 0:3 Kendal Tornado. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
PSIS Semarang score 0.53 goals per game on average and Kendal Tornado 1.57. The Liga 2 average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 29% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 43% of Kendal Tornado's.
What form are PSIS Semarang and Kendal Tornado in?
Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kendal Tornado 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for PSIS Semarang vs Kendal Tornado: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.