Indonesia - Liga 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

PSIS Semarang vs Persela: match statistics

PSIS Semarang crest
PSIS Semarang
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Persela crest
Persela
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

PSIS Semarang displays alarming home form with just 14% wins and a staggering 86% losses in matches at home, conceding an average of 2.71 goals per match. The hosts have won only 2 of 16 matches this season and possess a disastrous home goal difference of -16. Persela, on the other hand, is in solid away form with 43% wins and 43% draws on the road, conceding just 0.71 goals on average per match. The visitors hold a positive goal difference (+3) in away games and an impressive 43% clean sheets. Although both teams have identical PPG (1.2) in the last 5 matches, the immense difference in defensive efficiency and overall form favors Persela. Given PSIS's weakness in home matches and Persela's solidity away, the visitors are the clear favorites in this fixture.

PSIS Semarang vs Persela: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PSIS Semarang play Persela in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The match date is 24 January 2026 at 13:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

PSIS Semarang: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Persela: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

PSIS Semarang scores 0.81 and concedes 1.85 goals per match. Persela scores 1.26 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PSIS Semarang 33%, Persela 48%. Over 2.5: PSIS Semarang 48%, Persela 37%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. PSIS Semarang: 7.5 shots per match, Persela: 8.0.

Match halves

PSIS Semarang: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.48. Persela: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

PSIS Semarang: 76-90+ (7 goals). Persela: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 2: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-2-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

PSIS Semarang displays alarming home form with just 14% wins and a staggering 86% losses in matches at home, conceding an average of 2.71 goals per match. The hosts have won only 2 of 16 matches this season and possess a disastrous home goal difference of -16. Persela, on the other hand, is in solid away form with 43% wins and 43% draws on the road, conceding just 0.71 goals on average per match. The visitors hold a positive goal difference (+3) in away games and an impressive 43% clean sheets. Although both teams have identical PPG (1.2) in the last 5 matches, the immense difference in defensive efficiency and overall form favors Persela. Given PSIS's weakness in home matches and Persela's solidity away, the visitors are the clear favorites in this fixture.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
PSIS SemarangPersela
8Shots7
PSIS SemarangPersela
2Shots on target0
PSIS SemarangPersela
0.87xG0.78
PSIS SemarangPersela
4Corners1
PSIS SemarangPersela
31Dangerous attacks47
PSIS SemarangPersela
13Fouls16
PSIS SemarangPersela
1Cards5
PSIS SemarangPersela

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PSIS SemarangPersela
0.81Goals scored / match1.26
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.85Goals conceded / match0.96
PSIS SemarangPersela
46%Average possession45%
PSIS SemarangPersela
3.19Shots on target / match2.89
PSIS SemarangPersela

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

7.48Shots per match7.96
PSIS SemarangPersela
3.19Shots on target2.89
PSIS SemarangPersela
10.9%Shot conversion15.8%
PSIS SemarangPersela
46%Possession45%
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.11xG for1.11
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.49xG against1.45
PSIS SemarangPersela

Shooting quality

PSIS Semarang: BalancedPersela: Counter-attacking
PSIS SemarangPersela
Accuracy (shots on target)43%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Persela is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.6 pts / match - Persela

PSIS Semarang
LDLWL
Season result split
22% W19% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-16
0.85 pts / match · goal difference -28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-8
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Persela
WDWDL
Season result split
41% W30% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-8
1.52 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Persela is 56% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.26 goals / match - Persela

Persela is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.85 goals / match - PSIS Semarang · 0.96 goals / match - Persela

PSIS Semarang scoring profile: mixed

PSIS Semarang scores in 52% of matches (14 of 27 matches), while Persela keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

Persela scoring profile: very strong

Persela scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while PSIS Semarang keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).

22Goals scored (season)34
PSIS SemarangPersela
50Goals conceded (season)26
PSIS SemarangPersela
2.67Average goals in match2.22
PSIS SemarangPersela
5Goals scored (last 5)10
PSIS SemarangPersela
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
PSIS SemarangPersela

How often they score at least...

52%1 goal67%
PSIS SemarangPersela
11%2 goals33%
PSIS SemarangPersela
7%3 goals11%
PSIS SemarangPersela
4%4 goals4%
PSIS SemarangPersela

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal70%
PSIS SemarangPersela
52%2 goals15%
PSIS SemarangPersela
37%3 goals4%
PSIS SemarangPersela
15%4 goals4%
PSIS SemarangPersela

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

4%BTTS at half-time11%
PSIS SemarangPersela
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSIS SemarangPersela
11%Scored in both halves19%
PSIS SemarangPersela

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
PSIS SemarangPersela
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
PSIS SemarangPersela
40%BTTS - last 560%
PSIS SemarangPersela

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time52%
PSIS SemarangPersela
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
PSIS SemarangPersela
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
PSIS SemarangPersela

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
PSIS SemarangPersela
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
PSIS SemarangPersela
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
PSIS SemarangPersela

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Persela is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.93 pts / match - PSIS Semarang · 1.19 pts / match - Persela

PSIS Semarang - half-time state
22% leading26% draw52% trailing
Persela - half-time state
22% leading52% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.93Points per match (1st half)1.19
PSIS SemarangPersela
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.37
PSIS SemarangPersela
0.74Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.07Average goals (1st half)0.78
PSIS SemarangPersela
44%Clean sheet before half-time63%
PSIS SemarangPersela
74%No goal before half-time74%
PSIS SemarangPersela

After half-time (2nd half)

0.96Points per match (2nd half)1.81
PSIS SemarangPersela
0.48Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
PSIS SemarangPersela
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.44
PSIS SemarangPersela
44%Clean sheet after half-time63%
PSIS SemarangPersela
63%No goal after half-time41%
PSIS SemarangPersela

PSIS Semarang - second-half results

22% W30% R48% P
25
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Persela - second-half results

52% W26% R22% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding186%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PSIS Semarang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Persela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PSIS Semarang
ScoredConceded
0
6
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
9
31-45
3
6
46-60
3
5
61-75
7
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

Persela
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
3
1
16-30
5
6
31-45
9
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
14
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.44
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PSIS Semarang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.38
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
49%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
161%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Persela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.64
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).

Teams vs league

PSIS SemarangLigaPersela
Average goals in match 2.672.79 2.22
Both teams scored 33%51% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 37%
Clean sheets 22%28% 30%
Goal before half-time 78%70% 52%
Goal after half-time 74%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / match
1.15
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PSIS Semarang 0 - 2 - 0 Persela. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

PSIS Semarang
1 : 1
Persela
Persela
1 : 1
PSIS Semarang

FAQ

What was the result of PSIS Semarang vs Persela?

The Liga 2 match finished PSIS Semarang 1:0 Persela. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSIS Semarang and Persela?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSIS Semarang won 0, Persela won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSIS Semarang vs Persela?

PSIS Semarang score 0.81 goals per game on average and Persela 1.26. The Liga 2 average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 33% of PSIS Semarang's matches and 48% of Persela's.

What form are PSIS Semarang and Persela in?

Over the last 5 games PSIS Semarang have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persela 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSIS Semarang vs Persela?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.