Indonesia - Liga 1Data current as of September 13, 2026

PSM vs Arema: match statistics

PSM crest
PSM
3 : 3half-time 1:2
Arema crest
Arema

PSM vs Arema: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PSM played against Arema in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Final score: 3:3.

Recent form

PSM has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Arema has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

PSM scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 3.00. Arema scores 4.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of PSM's games and 0% of Arema's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSM has the higher season xG average, 1.05 to 0.00 per game. PSM takes 7.0 shots per game, while Arema takes -1.0.

First-half and second-half trends

PSM leads at halftime in 100% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Arema leads at halftime in 100% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

PSM's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Arema, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Arema go into the match as league leaders and won their only league game so far, scoring 4 goals without conceding. PSM are down in 17th place after losing their opening match of the season 1:3. The difference is also evident in their last five appearances: Arema recorded 3 wins, scored 9 goals and conceded 5, while PSM lost 4 times, with 4 goals scored and 11 conceded. During this period, the visitors averaged 1.8 goals per match, while the hosts conceded 2.2, significantly increasing Arema’s chances of exploiting their opponents’ defensive problems. PSM have home advantage, but with just 0.6 points per match in their last five fixtures, it is difficult to view it as a sufficient argument against the visiting side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS pick is not supported by the season data: PSM kept a clean sheet in 100% of matches, while both teams currently have a BTTS rate of 0%. Arema have yet to score in the season data, which is the strongest argument for a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Recent form partially increases the risk of both teams scoring, as BTTS occurred in 60% of PSM’s and 40% of Arema’s last 5 matches. However, PSM scored only 0.8 goals per match during this period, with an xG of 1.21, while Arema conceded an average of just 1.0 goal and 0.86 xG from opponents. Although PSM conceded as many as 2.2 goals per match across their last five fixtures, Arema’s poor season-long attacking efficiency and their zero goals scored marginally support BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

PSM’s last five matches produced an average of 3.0 goals, as the team scored only 0.8 goals but conceded as many as 2.2. Over the same period, Arema averaged 1.8 goals per match, while PSM allowed opponents to score 11 goals in five games, reinforcing the outlook for an away goal. Matches featuring at least three goals occurred in 80% of PSM’s last five fixtures and in 60% of Arema’s matches, clearly more often than the league average of 33%. Caution with higher lines is warranted due to the quality of chances: Arema’s average xG is 0.82, compared with 1.21 for PSM, making a four-goal outcome less likely as the baseline scenario. The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals, as the hosts’ defensive weaknesses and Arema’s attacking form should be enough to produce at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Recent form clearly favors Arema: the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, while PSM have lost 4 of 5. Arema held the lead at the break in 60% of those games and scored an average of 1.6 goals before half-time, compared with just 0.4 for PSM, who went into the interval trailing in as many as 60% of cases. The quality gap between the two sides is also evident over the full match: Arema average 1.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, whereas PSM score 0.8 and allow opponents 2.2 goals. After the break, the hosts concede an average of 1.4 goals, while Arema keep a clean sheet in 80% of second halves, strengthening the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and holding on for the win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 2
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

59Possession (%)41
PSMArema
14Shots9
PSMArema
9Shots on target6
PSMArema
2xG1.21
PSMArema
7Corners1
PSMArema
68Dangerous attacks30
PSMArema
-1Fouls-1
PSMArema
2Cards1
PSMArema

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game4
PSMArema
3Goals allowed / game0
PSMArema
36%Average possession51%
PSMArema
3Shots on target / game-1
PSMArema

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7Shots per game-1
PSMArema
3Shots on target-1
PSMArema
14.3%Shot conversion-400%
PSMArema
36%Possession51%
PSMArema
1.05xG for0
PSMArema
1.72xG against0
PSMArema

Shooting quality

PSM: Counter-attackingArema: Balanced
PSMArema
Accuracy (shots on target)43%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PSM
L
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Arema
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arema is 300% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - PSM · 4 goals / game - Arema

PSM scoring profile: mixed

PSM scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Arema keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 meczów).

Arema scoring profile: very strong

Arema scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while PSM keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

1Goals scored (season)4
PSMArema
3Goals conceded (season)0
PSMArema
4Average goals per game4
PSMArema
1Goals scored (last 5)4
PSMArema
3Goals conceded (last 5)0
PSMArema

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
PSMArema
0%2 goals100%
PSMArema
0%3 goals100%
PSMArema
0%4 goals100%
PSMArema

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal0%
PSMArema
100%2 goals0%
PSMArema
100%3 goals0%
PSMArema
0%4 goals0%
PSMArema

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
PSMArema
0%BTTS in both halves0%
PSMArema
0%Scored in both halves100%
PSMArema

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PSMArema
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS100%
PSMArema
100%BTTS - last 50%
PSMArema

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
PSMArema
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
PSMArema
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time100%
PSMArema

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PSMArema
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PSMArema
100%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PSMArema

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PSM - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
Arema - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per game (1st half)3
PSMArema
1Goals scored (1st half)3
PSMArema
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
PSMArema
1Average goals (1st half)3
PSMArema
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
PSMArema
0%No goal before half-time0%
PSMArema

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)3
PSMArema
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
PSMArema
3Goals conceded (2nd half)0
PSMArema
3Average goals (2nd half)1
PSMArema
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
PSMArema
100%No goal after half-time0%
PSMArema

PSM - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+3.0

Allows 3.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Arema - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

PSM - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.000.00
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.03.0
Average goals per game1.03.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Arema - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.003.00
Goals scored / game3.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game3.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals100%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PSM
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Arema
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

4.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 3.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
150%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PSM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
265%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Arema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+4.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+4.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
354%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-2.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

PSMLigaArema
Average goals per game 4.002.67 4.00
Both teams scored 100%60% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%47% 100%
Clean sheets 0%20% 100%
Goal before half-time 100%87% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
20%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AremaYellow cardAchmad Maulana Syarif
  2. PSMGoalStefan Jevtoski
  3. AremaSubstitutionOn: Sneyder Julián Muñoz MuñozOff: Achmad Maulana Syarif
  4. AremaSubstitutionOn: Leo GuntaraOff: Johan Ahmad Farisi
  5. PSMSubstitutionOn: Resky Fandi WitriawanOff: Stefan Jevtoski
  6. PSMYellow cardResky Fandi Witriawan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from PSM's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Arema. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Arema
3 : 0
PSM
PSM
1 : 2
Arema

FAQ

What was the result of PSM vs Arema?

The Liga 1 match finished PSM 3:3 Arema. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PSM and Arema?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PSM won 0, Arema won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PSM vs Arema?

PSM score 1.00 goals per game on average and Arema 4.00. The Liga 1 average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 100% of PSM's matches and 0% of Arema's.

What form are PSM and Arema in?

Over the last 5 games PSM have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Arema 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSM vs Arema?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.