PSPS vs Persekat: match statistics
As hosts, PSPS holds a clear advantage in this clash. The home team shows solid form at their own stadium with a goal difference of 0 and a scoring efficiency of 11%, while Persekat has a negative goal difference of -8 and a very poor efficiency of just 7% in away matches. The hosts average 1.14 goals per home match, whereas the visitors score only 0.5 goals away and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. PSPS also possesses better possession statistics (52% vs 48%) and a significantly higher number of shots on goal (6.14 vs 2.86). Although Persekat shows better recent overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), their weakness on the road (63% loss rate) argues for a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to the high number of draws for PSPS at home (43%), but the statistical advantage gives the hosts the best chance of triumph.
PSPS vs Persekat: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PSPS played against Persekat in Liga 2 (Indonesia). The game was played on January 16, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
PSPS has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Persekat has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
PSPS scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 2.00. Persekat scores 0.73 and allows 1.27. Games in this league average 2.62 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 60% of PSPS's games and 33% of Persekat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PSPS has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.41 per game. PSPS takes 9.3 shots per game, while Persekat takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
PSPS leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Persekat leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.53 after halftime.
When the teams score
PSPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Persekat, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Liga 2 games average 2.62 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
As hosts, PSPS holds a clear advantage in this clash. The home team shows solid form at their own stadium with a goal difference of 0 and a scoring efficiency of 11%, while Persekat has a negative goal difference of -8 and a very poor efficiency of just 7% in away matches. The hosts average 1.14 goals per home match, whereas the visitors score only 0.5 goals away and fail to find the net in 50% of their matches. PSPS also possesses better possession statistics (52% vs 48%) and a significantly higher number of shots on goal (6.14 vs 2.86). Although Persekat shows better recent overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), their weakness on the road (63% loss rate) argues for a home victory. A draw remains a realistic option due to the high number of draws for PSPS at home (43%), but the statistical advantage gives the hosts the best chance of triumph.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PSPS | Persekat | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 58% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Persekat is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - PSPS · 1.6 pts / game - Persekat
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PSPS is 119% better for: goals scored per game.
1.6 goals / game - PSPS · 0.73 goals / game - Persekat
Persekat is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - PSPS · 1.27 goals / game - Persekat
PSPS scores in 73% of games (11 of 15 meczów), while Persekat keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 meczów).
Persekat scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while PSPS keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PSPS
Over / Under - Persekat
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PSPS is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.27 pts / game - PSPS · 1.07 pts / game - Persekat
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PSPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Persekat - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PSPS
Persekat
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 2).
Teams vs league
| PSPS | Liga | Persekat | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.60 | 2.62 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 45% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 29% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 68% | ▼ 40% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- PSPSYellow cardBrandon Marsel Scheunemann
Head-to-head
Record from PSPS's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Persekat. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PSPS vs Persekat?
The Liga 2 match finished PSPS 2:0 Persekat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PSPS vs Persekat?
PSPS score 1.60 goals per game on average and Persekat 0.73. The Liga 2 average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 60% of PSPS's matches and 33% of Persekat's.
What form are PSPS and Persekat in?
Over the last 5 games PSPS have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Persekat 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PSPS vs Persekat?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.